ipl-logo

Rhetorical Analysis Of What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July

462 Words2 Pages

Frederick Douglass was a successful abolitionist responsible for giving the famously stimulating speech “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” Embedded within this speech were multiple rhetorical strategies such as parallelism, antithesis, and rhetorical questions; all of which contributed to the overall exemplary writing. Parallelism made his sentences more powerful; it emphasized his argument by using the same structure. When Douglass harmonized his verbal arrangements, it added venom in his words and drama to the speech. He wanted passion so that the audience took him seriously and paid attention to his words. “When the dogs in your streets, when the fowls of the air, when the Antithesis, like parallelism, has a great impact on writing. It allows the writer to distinguish differences in all aspects: characteristics, opinions, and many other ideas. “To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass-fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are to him mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and …show more content…

This literary device is most often used to interrogate or clarify the audience’s opinions. They might influence the audience to favor the writer’s opinion. “For who is there so cold that a nation’s sympathy could not warm him? Who so obdurate and dead to the claims of gratitude, that would not thankfully acknowledge such priceless benefits? Who so stolid and selfish, that would not give his voice to swell the hallelujahs of a nation’s jubilee, when the chains of servitude had been torn from his limbs?” These rhetorical questions make the audience think about their own views and what they feel is

Open Document