Rhetorical Analysis Of What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July

1022 Words5 Pages

Frederick Douglass's speech "What, to the Slave, is the Fourth of July" delivered in 1852 remains a powerful indictment of American history and culture. In his passionate address, Douglass criticizes various aspects of American practices and religions that perpetuate slavery and deny the basic rights and humanity of enslaved individuals. This essay explores the specific bases of Douglass's critique, examining the parts of American practices and religions he objects to and the reasons behind his objections. Moreover, it analyzes the enduring relevance of the speech's themes and messages for contemporary America, illustrating how the echoes of Douglass's words continue to resonate today.
Frederick Douglass, an influential African American abolitionist, effectively highlights the stark contrast between the principles of freedom and equality enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and the reality of slavery in the United States. While the Declaration eloquently proclaims that "all men are created equal" and possess certain "unalienable rights," such as "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," the institution of slavery directly contradicted these lofty ideals. Slavery was a deeply entrenched practice, especially in the Southern states, where millions of African Americans endured inhumane …show more content…

However, Douglass points out the hypocrisy of these figures, many of whom were slave owners themselves. This paradox challenges the traditional narratives of American history that portray these individuals as virtuous champions of freedom. While they were instrumental in shaping the nation's foundational principles and promoting ideas of democracy and liberty, their simultaneous ownership of slaves raises ethical concerns and exposes the complexities and contradictions within the nation's