It is 2002 when Richard Masterson is convicted of murder and in the turning of 2016, he is executed. However, there has been an influx of proceedings that make this decision uncertain. The judge for the case failed to mention to the ignorant jury that Richardson had the option of a sentence lighter than capital punishment. The medical examiner for the autopsy of the victim was unsuited and had misdiagnosed the cause of death. Third, Masterson’s attorneys claimed that he had exhibited suicidal behaviour, an explanation why he eagerly confessed to the crime. With this, it leaves innocence to be questioned. What is certain his life has already been lost.
Capital punishment, more commonly known as the death penalty, is a hotly debated topic on whether or not if it is truly right for the justice system to take a person’s life. We as a society are morally obligated to choose whether or not to end a life in states of relevant peace and choices. Since 1976, it’s reinstatement, 1,392 American citizens (statisticbrain.com) have died because of it. The South being the main culprit of that statistic, making up 82%. Yes, it is a system that has been ingrained into the history of mankind, but American citizens have the luxury to know they are safe once a felon is convicted. If that is the main stem of the opposing argument, then it should be deemed unnecessary that we as a country still have the barbarism to kill another person for
…show more content…
The reason why America has brought back the death penalty is more because, “After the death penalty was abolished, murder rates nearly tripled, rising to an all-time high in the 1980s.” (http://ic.galegroup.com). The areas where the murders were most concentrated were in minority neighborhoods too. Yes, poverty and crime may have gotten better since then. But why should the country repeat history and increase the risk of