Consider the criticism that Richard Swinburne's philosophy makes his conception of God too anthropomorphic. Richard Swinburne was born on the 26th December, 1934 in the United Kingdom. He is a British philosopher of religion who is also an Emeritus Professor of philosophy at the University of Oxford in England. Over the last 5 decades, Richard Swinburne has been an influential proponent of philosophical arguments of the existence of God. His philosophical contributions are basically in the philosophy of religion and philosophy of science. He stirred so much discussion with his early work in the philosophy of religion, a series of books comprising of ‘The Coherence of Theism’, ‘The Existence of God’, and ‘Faith and Reason’. Richard Swinburne can be said to be theist because of his works which he talked about the belief of God. Meanwhile, theism can be said to be the belief in one God as the creator and ruler of the universe, without rejection of revelation (Dictionary, 1986). As a member of the Orthodox Church, he is recognised as one of the foremost Christian apologists, arguing in his various articles and books that faith in Christianity is rational and coherent in a rigorous philosophical sense While Swinburne …show more content…
By a ‘God’ he understands something like a ‘person without a body (i.e. a spirit) who is everlasting, free, able to do anything, understands everything, is perfectly good, is the proper object of human worship, the creator and sustainer of the universe’ (Swinburne, 1993). When God is presented as a character in a story, then obviously he will and must be depicted as a being, a divine self, practically equivalent to a human self. This implies that in the event that we take the Bible straight, in a manner of speaking, we will dependably consider God as an individual. All we then need to do is isolate God from exemplification and finitude, and eventually, we have Swinburne's omnipresent