ipl-logo

Riley Vs California Research Paper

833 Words4 Pages

Charlie Avery Mr. Kotowski U.S. History 17 February, 2015 Riley vs. California Research Paper The Riley versus California case is one of the most recent Supreme Court proceedings dealing with the Fourth Amendment. The case between David Leon Riley and the State of California was fought over whether police should be able to search cell phones without a warrant when they are apprehending a suspect. The Supreme Court had the Job of discovering if Riley’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches was violated (EPIC, “Riley v. California”). The judges, headed by Chief Justice John G. Roberts had a very difficult decision to make, as they had to apply an Amendment from 1789 to the modern, digital age, where people store so …show more content…

Upon searching Riley’s name in their database, officers discovered that Riley had been driving on a suspended license, and put him under arrest (Oyez, “Riley v. California”). The article from Oyez also says that the Police’s standard protocol was to search the car for drugs, firearms, or any suspicious items before impounding the car. When this occurred, two guns were found. After finding this information the police also examined Riley’s cellphone before obtaining a proper warrant; they found pictures of Riley flashing gang signs, texts, all of which were subsequently used to link Riley to an attempted homicide twenty days prior to the arrest, with this evidence Riley was charged with an unassociated murder on August 2nd. (EPIC, “Riley v. California”) Bensur and Brokamp say in their article that in court, Riley claimed that his Fourth Amendment right was violated because the officers did not have probable cause also called reasonable suspicion to examine his phone. The case went to the Supreme Court and the judges agreed that the police had acted …show more content…

Roberts. The Court’s decision was a unanimous 9-0 in favor of David Riley (Oyez, “Riley v. California”). This means that there was no dissenting opinion because the all the judges voted the same. In the judges statement says that it is unnecessary to search the phone right away because it can just be held until a proper warrant is obtained. The judges also claimed that because of the “Cloud” most of the information that would be searched is not technically in physical possession of the person.(Oyez, “Riley v. California”). It is clear from this ruling that the Supreme Court Judges want to make sure that everyone in the U.S. has the privacy that they

Show More
Related

Chimel Vs. California Case Study

455 Words | 2 Pages

They have also said that it is reasonable for any officer to do an immediate area search of where that individual is to make sure that they can not grab anything for a weapon like for example a knife. The Supreme Court clearly notes in its opinion that such searches have to happen in the immediate area of arrest and any such search outside that area must be made with a search warrant. In Chimel case the officers could have patted down Chimel and then done a search of the immediate area to make sure that no weapons were hiding around. But once they began looking all around the house that requires a search warrant. The Supreme Court reversed the California Supreme Court’s

Read More

California Vs. Greenwood Case Study

478 Words | 2 Pages

The case involves the question of whether or not the police were within their rights to search the trash that was left at the curbside without a warrant. The amendment

Read More

David Leon Riley: The Lincoln Park Gang

524 Words | 3 Pages

David Leon Riley, a gangster who is in the Lincoln Park Gang in San Diego, CA was involved in a rival gang shooting. The rival of Riley’s gang shot at the Lincoln Park Gang and then got into Riley’s vehicle, stole it, and drove off. Riley had his cell phone in his possession when he was apprehended. So a detective analyzed the videos and photographs of Riley making gang signs and other gang indicia that were stored on the phone to verify whether Riley was gang affiliated. On August 22, 2009, the police pulled Riley over which he was driving a different car which later they found out that he was driving on expired license registration tags.

Read More

Whitney Vs. Californi Case Study

509 Words | 3 Pages

They ruled that the 1st amendment did not guarantee ultimate freedom of speech and anyone violating the government could be overthrown by the state. The historical impact that the case was made mostly from Justice Brandeis, who stated that immediate serious and evil threats should be the only ones that are taken seriously enough to strip away someone’s granted rights. Brandeis’s opinion was put to use in 1969 when the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio, which is when the court overruled the decision. Yes, there are laws to help protect the natural-born citizens of this country, but if they can be taken and maneuvered to make sure the courts get what they want, why have

Read More

Summary: Carpenter V. United States

576 Words | 3 Pages

In the article produced by Damon Root, the Indiana Supreme Court stated this, “ Cellphones are double- edged swords, increasing convenience at the expense of privacy.” Although an electronic device may help a consumer in an everyday life,privacy is cut short considering that most of the storage in a device is not protected. As consumers put their information out on the internet, it is for everyone to see. One statement from the Supreme court said this, “What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection.” As a person releases information to the public, exposing themself to whoever is allowed to see, they are opening a window to their personal

Read More

Supreme Court Case Of Timothy Carpenter

1800 Words | 8 Pages

Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cellphone records revealing the location and movements of a cellphone user of the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment? Facts: In April 2011, a group of four men were arrested for a series of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio. One of the four men confessed to the crimes, and he gave the FBI his number along with the number of everyone else involved in the crime. One of the people convicted in the crime was Timothy Carpenter.

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Riley Vs. California

1346 Words | 6 Pages

Riley v. California in 2014 was a case in which the United States Supreme Court argued whether the police has the right to search and seize digital content without a warrant, from individuals who have been arrested. So, the main question of the case was whether the evidence admitted at trial from Riley’s cell phone violated his Fourth Amendment right. The court ruled, by a unanimous vote that a warrantless cell phone search during an arrest is unconstitutional. On August 22, 2009, the police stopped David Leon Riley for driving with an expired registration tag.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Stingray In The United States

674 Words | 3 Pages

A different federal judge ruled that if the DEA wishes to use a stingray to bring in a criminal then they must have a warrant to use it [source]. The argument that a lot of people will make when it comes to surveillance is that if you’ve done nothing wrong, then you have nothing to hide. If we apply that same logic to this specific case, then we might as well say that the government should be able to put a unique tracking device on each one of us that we must always carry around. Many people would probably no want to be constantly tracked by the government openly, so why should we be okay with tracking us whenever they want, just without announcing it? We are afforded legal protections for most other private areas in our lives so why should we have almost no rights when it comes to something that we depend on and use every day?

Read More

How Do Phone Snooping Violate The 4th Amendment

248 Words | 1 Pages

A phone with bank information can be a top prize for a treacherous police officer. They can go to your home, text contacts, even steal identities if you put enough information on alleged “secure” personal devices. Phone snooping violates the 4th amendment, which says "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…”. When Gregory Diaz, a California resident who was seen participating a drug deal, was ordered to hand over his phone to an officer without a warrant, it violated the amendment. The Supreme Court, when notified about the case, decided that Diaz’s case was an exception to the 200 y/o rule.

Read More

Dk Dbq Analysis

742 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their private property, and may only be searched with probable cause. However, in a recent case, this right was violated by the government. An Oregon citizen, with the initials of DLK, was suspected of growing marijuana in his home. The federal government used a thermal imager to scan his home, and were later given a warrant to physically search his home. However, many remain divided over whether or not this scan was constitutional, as there was no warrant at the time of the scan.

Read More

Fourth Amendment Dbq

778 Words | 4 Pages

(Source 1.2) If the government wanted to go further than top-line data, for example listening to someone’s phone calls that is when the government needs to go to a federal judge. Furthermore, a judge and the government work together so everyone's privacy is protected and that is their

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Should The NSA Surveillance

169 Words | 1 Pages

The whole point of the Fourth Amendment is not to completely stop the police, because the amendment can be waived if an officer has a warrant, or a person’s consent. The Fourth Amendment states that generally a search or seizure is illegal unless there is a warrant, or special circumstances. Technically stating that a citizen is protected by the Fourth Amendment, until a government employee gets a warrant, and then they can invade a citizen’s privacy. Also people state that the FISA Court’s warrants are constitutional, but the NSA’s surveillance is unconstitutional. Even though people do not like the NSA’s surveillance, the NSA is legal because the FISA Court that the people did not mind makes it legal.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

427 Words | 2 Pages

The Verdict discussed how both cases were attempting to suppress evidence from their cell phones which now contain much more information than they once did. Cases like this continue to shape our rights. The fourth amendment is here to protect ourselves from being incriminated. In modern day the fourth amendment is in question due to new technology.

Read More

Key Constitutional Concepts By Leonore Annemore Annenberg Institute For Civics

644 Words | 3 Pages

This landmark case affirmed that the 6th Amendment applies to all states under the 14th Amendment. Not only did the video show the importance of the amendments to the constitution, it also demonstrated the possible pitfalls of judicial review, but also its ability to ensure the personal rights provided by the constitution are not

Read More

The Right To Privacy

989 Words | 4 Pages

The right to privacy is not only a human right but an element to various legal traditions which may restrain both government and private party action that threaten the privacy of an individual The fourth, fifth and the ninth amendment protect our right to privacy. Today our privacy is being threaten due to the growing issues that threaten our national security. With growing amount of terrorist attacks, bombings, school shooting, and other massive shootings it definitely seems to warrant the loss of privacy. However, how far is too far and who decides?

Read More

More about Riley Vs California Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document