ipl-logo

Rivas-Membreno's Argumentative Essay

132 Words1 Pages
Within his argument in favor of merging his sentences under the required evidence test, Rivas-Membreno claims that “[w]ith respect to [his] conviction for soliciting witness intimidation, there is simply no evidence to support it.” If the State’s evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction with respect to a particular charge, the proper means of challenging the charge is to make a motion for judgment of acquittal under Md. Rule 4-324. If a defendant fails to move for a judgment of acquittal, or fails to renew his motion at the conclusion of his presentation of evidence, the motion is waived. Md. Rule 4-324(c). Here, no such motion was made before the trial court. Accordingly, Rivas-Membreno waived his argument against the sufficiency

More about Rivas-Membreno's Argumentative Essay

Open Document