Walls can separate many things. Robert Frost’s poem and Ronald Reagan’s speech are two great stories that show why walls are unnatural and unnecessary. These stories explain how walls affect people, the country it was built in, and civilization. Walls aren 't needed in the world, not to separate people from everyday necessities. In essence to the wall, the effects it had on people were hurting not only the environment, but the people’s health to. Frost’s poem represents that the only thing a wall will ever serve a purpose for is to separate people from humanity. Also, Frost tells that it made people out to be hypocritical. In contrast to Frost, Raegan having a factual story, expresses that the Berlin Wall separated people from society, rights, freedom, and family. Because this effect on the the people took action, the walls affected the country too. The wall in Frost’s story didn 't really effect the the country, however, the wall in Raegans story did. Because of how long this massive wall was, it made a massive effect on the …show more content…
Imagine being stuck on one side of a wall. Much less, the side you didn 't want to be on. Thousands of people couldn 't get to there family 's, food, or any necessity if it wasn 't on the side of the wall they were on. No longer were people free. This wall divided the continent into a half free, half communist country. People had no control under the communists. Civilization was no longer free. Walls in these story 's weren 't necessary. In fact, it affected people, the country it was built in, and civilization. Nature doesn 't like walls, neither do people, mostly. That 's why the wall of Berlin was tore down, because it didn 't do anything but destroy the government and people of that country. If people were meant to be isolated, then maybe a wall would be the answer, but people deserve freedom. Maybe now, we the people know not to ever build a wall to seperate anybody from anything. The world needs to be at