ipl-logo

Robert Vogel Case Summary

1244 Words5 Pages

Overview In 2015, the Tennessee Supreme Court rejected the 30-day suspension of the law license of attorney, Robert Vogel, who was caught by federal authorities in a sex scandal involving a young pill-addicted female client, and provided confidential information about another client to a judge in a separate matter (Satterfield, 2015). Vogel was appointed to represent the girlfriend of the leader of a $6.5 million pill distribution network in 2012, when he began to beg the women to engage in sexual encounters (Satterfield, 2015). The client complied with his requests, stating that she felt Vogel “held her future in his hands” because she faced serious federal prison time (Satterfield, 2015). The women tried to end the relationship on several …show more content…

Records revealed that Vogel had engaged in several sexual encounters with young female clients, facing serious federal criminal charges (WVLT-TV, 2016). The Supreme Court increased Vogel’s punishment to one year of active suspension (WVLT-TV, 2016). The following provides further discussion on the case as it related to category four of the course syllabus, attorney discipline and the public image of lawyers. Particular emphasizes is placed upon ethics, morality, and other challenges that make this story …show more content…

Most significantly, it will impact the professional image of Vogel and generate challenges for his family. Being that his wife and children caught him in his act, there will be a world of problems for the family. They will also suffer from the negative image that Vogel is likely to obtain, as well as, having to deal with the media. In regards to Vogel, his public image is likely to be destroyed and many are going to question his ability to continue practicing in the field. The justice system is also going to be impacted by their decision to increase punishment for the attorney. Most importantly, they will now have to consider similar punishment for similar cases in the future, leading to a very significant point related to the role of the justice system in sanctioning

Show More
Related

Michael Ira Asen Case Summary

333 Words | 2 Pages

This is the highest professional rating that Martindale-Hubbell offers to practicing US lawyers. Michael Ira Asen embarked on his career as a federal defender with United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, handling a number of cases that involved accusations of white-collar and organized crime. For the past 14 years, he has represented a large number of consumer goods merchants in the areas of civil recovery and employee restitutions after incidences of retail theft. Currently licensed to practice before six different federal courts in New York and New Jersey, Mr. Asen operates his own private practice in Greenvale, New York. In addition to maintaining this practice, he is a founder of the Sound Shore Symphony Orchestra and a lecturer for the National Business Institute.

Read More

Bobbi Krisine Case Summary

361 Words | 2 Pages

Bobbi Kristina Brown was moved to hospice care. Radar Online, June 24, 2015 reported that the family has agreed to take Bobbi Kristina off drugs so she can pass away naturally. This means that unless a miracle happens, Bobbi Kristina will not be with us for much longer. Bobbi Kristina was found on January 31; face down and unresponsive in her bathtub at her home in Atlanta. She was found by family friend, Max Lomas.

Read More

Lou Dempsey Case Summary

547 Words | 3 Pages

As Lawyer Farrington said, Lou Dempsey was accused of illegally selling alcohol to the minor, Eric Howe. Mr. Dempsey failed to meet his responsibilities of asking for identification and anticipating violence and/or accidents caused from alcohol. The amount of alcohol that was given to Mr. Howe, allowed each member attending the party to dissipate their sobriety after drinking four standard cups.

Read More

Regina Stewart Case Study

1119 Words | 5 Pages

The first case that I’m going to talk about is the Erma Faye Stewart case and Regina Kelly case. These two women were charged with felony drug distribution charges. This case took place in Hearne, Texas back in 2000. Stewart and Kelly along with 25 other men were charged in this case. Everybody bail was set to 70,000 each.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Gideon Vs Wainwright

1082 Words | 5 Pages

The landmark Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) ruled that the 6th amendment obligated federal and state government to provide an attorney to anyone who could not afford one. Gideon v Wainwright ruled in favor of public defenders to create a mechanism which limited the government’s power by having them prove their convictions beyond a reasonable doubt. Currently, the Supreme Court ruling has created enormous caseloads that many busy courts struggle to handle. As a solution to the problems of high caseloads, plea bargaining has become the primary method of closing cases. Although achieving greater efficiency for the criminal justice is necessary, overly utilizing plea bargains weakens the criminal justice as it fails to reinforce the principles established in Gideon v Wainwright by foregoing trials.

Read More

Elizabeth Olson's Law Graduate Gets Her Day In Court, Suing Law School?

175 Words | 1 Pages

Elizabeth Olson’s article, “Law Graduate Gets Her Day in Court, Suing Law School” (2016), contends that by posting misleading information about post-graduation employment, many law schools are damaging students’ futures by failing to provide a guarantee of a full-time job as a lawyer and burying them in debts. Olson develops her claim by describing the case of Anna Alaburda, a former law student whose case against her law school is going to trial after five years, acknowledging law schools’ stance on the issue, and listing examples of similar cases that failed to favor the law students. Her purpose is to reveal the unfair consequences of false advertising in order to raise awareness of a common problem amongst law students and to force a change

Read More

Anthony Graves Case

622 Words | 3 Pages

Anthony Graves was wrongly convicted and sentenced to death by the state of Texas. His conviction was for the murders of Bobbie Davis, her adult daughter, and her four grandchildren on October 21, 1994. He was to be executed on October 27, 2010, but was exonerated due to new evidence surfacing about Charles Sebesta, Anthony’s lawyer.

Read More

Gideon V Wainwright Case Summary

631 Words | 3 Pages

Countless people are getting placed in the criminal justice system on meager charges. Then, the system offers them “Legal Misrepresentation,” even though Gideon v. Wainwright (Alexander, 2012, p. 85) stated that they are entitled to an attorney if they are accused of a serious crime and indigent. Yet, public defendant attorneys lack resources and are overburdened with a substantial caseload that they cannot give defendants suitable representation. Subsequently, these accused people are forced into a plea deal to offset spending the mandatory maximum sentences in prison. Bad Deal

Read More

Pt1420 Unit 6 Research Paper

283 Words | 2 Pages

5. Public trials and executions serve as a deterance of deviant behaviors. These sanctions act as a way to set an example and for people to see what will happen to them if they do the same thing, These sanctions can also be seen as reinforcing boundaries. Although public executions and trials in “town square” are not as common in most countries today, the media is utilized to fulfil the same purpose. When there are high profile cases going on in the United States often tmes the full trial and sentancings are televised so that much of society can see what the repercussions are for defying a social norm.

Read More

Essay On Duke Lacrosse

680 Words | 3 Pages

Nifong and the Duke Lacrosse case highlight several key institutional failures of the justice system in regards to prosecutorial discretion, prosecutor accountability, and the prosecutors dilemma. Prosecutors are considered by many to be the most powerful actors in the courtroom proceedings as they follow the case from the time of arrest to the sentencing. Prosecutors have a lot of discretion in the justice process as they are the ones who decide: Do I prosecute? Who do I prosecute?

Read More

Professor Barry C. Feld: Juvenile Justice

276 Words | 2 Pages

Professor Barry C. Feld (’69) is a one of the nation’s leading scholars of juvenile justice. He currently teaches criminal procedure, juvenile law, torts. In 1990, Professor Feld was named the Law School’s first Centennial Professor of Law. He was the Julius E. Davis Professor of Law for 1981-82. Professor Feld received his B.A. degree from the University of Pennsylvania.

Read More

Honorable Judge Shofield

453 Words | 2 Pages

For my WebTour I decided to visit www.uscourts.gov. I was immediately drawn to the “Pathways to the Bench Video Series”. Here, videos catalogue prominent United States judges, and how they began their lives up until the positions they hold as judicial officials today. I began to utilize the page’s content by viewing the video “U.S. District Court Judge Lorna G. Schofield”. This video talks about the adversity Lorna G. Schofield growing up with an extremely strict mother.

Read More

Legitimacy Of The System By Allowing Retrials For New Evidence

915 Words | 4 Pages

If the court is unable to revisit a case and new evidence is provided, it means that its lacks legitimacy. The reform, however allows for only one subsequent trial. Opening the case several times would create a conflict between the states and its institutions. [2]The state will appear as if it lacks willingness to believe in institutions it created. In addition, many trials will be an abuse to the defendant and the state will commit many resources in attempts to prosecute the defendant.

Read More

Analysis Of The Criminal Justice System In The New Jim Crow By Michelle Alexander

1001 Words | 5 Pages

It was declared that for more severe punishment needed to

Read More

Robert Harris Case

1033 Words | 5 Pages

This brings into question the severity and extent to which Robert Harris should be held accountable for his actions. There are two different ends of the morality spectrum through which Harris can be found guilty: moral responsibility and criminal responsibility. This is where the different theories on moral responsibility truly come into play. While none of these philosophical arguments would hold up in court, it does make the decisions made by Robert Harris seem much more complicated than it first appeared. The criminal justice system is based on a libertarian train of thought.

Read More

More about Robert Vogel Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document