ipl-logo

Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

445 Words2 Pages

The author of anti-federalist 17# was Robert Yates (not the serial killer), at the time he was a politician and judge also the oldest of his family. he lived in the state of New York and tried to run for governor. The document yates wrote was just about states that the anti-federalists did not desire a constitution as a result of they felt that it 'd offer the central government an excessive amount of power which it 'd remove all power from the states. "to raise and support armies at pleasure, in addition in peace as in war, and their management over the militia, tend not solely to a consolidation of the govt., however the destruction of liberty..." a stronger central government would higher shield everybody and is additional for the good …show more content…

Another Example by Robert Yates was Anti-federalist 10#, "Brutus" Argues that an outsized army provides any would-be dictator the suggests that to deprive individual voters of their liberties. As such, solon is pretty clear that an outsized Federal Army (presumably beneath the management of a President, Prime Minister, or King) would draw troopers from the states and will be mobilized to repress the public in any state.As such, the text demonstrates the foundations of the checks and balances later applied to our trendy military, specifically associate degree all-volunteer army with strict limits on terms of service unless throughout a time of war, and whereas the President is that the commander-in-chief, solely Congress will declare war. he transition from the Articles of Confederation to the u. s. Constitution wasn 't a seamless one, and fixing the issues of the Articles of Confederation needed a series of protracted debates each throughout and when the convention. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

Show More
Related
136 Words | 1 Pages

In 1787 and 1788, the Federalist Papers were written and published in various newspapers in the state of New York intended to encourage Yorkers to vote in ratifying the proposed Constitution. The famous papers consist of eighty-five essays authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. In Federalist Paper No. 17, Alexander Hamilton explicitly addresses the fear that the proposed Constitution would lead to oppression at the hands of an “autocratic” national government. Hamilton argues that even if the national government were to try and seize the power of the states, it would not be simple to do. The main reason Hamilton gives that the States rights would be reserved is because these government have a greater influence over

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

Robert Yates was an Anti federalist and did not support the constitution. He arrived at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787, but decided to leave early due to the fact that he did not believe in adopting a federal Constitution and left on July 10, 1787. He did not believe in a strong central government and did not have a position in the new Federal Government. He was against any concession to the federal congress that might lessen the sovereignty of the states. He stated this all in a letter with John Langston that was written to Governor George Clinton of New York, stating the dangers of centralizing power and urging opposition to the adoption of the Constitution.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

The Anti-Federalist consisted of many proud men who believed that the bill of rights was in did necessary before executing the future government. Unlike the Federalist, who focused on a central government that could have personally stolen and threaten our freedom; had no right to engage the Constitution? In the document Brutus 1, had stated clearly his motive, “Though I am of opinion, that it is a sufficient objection to this government, to reject it, that it creates the whole union into one government, under the form of a republic, yet if this objection was obviated, there are exceptions to it, which are so material and fundamental, that they ought to determine every man, who is a friend to the liberty and happiness of mankind, not to adopt

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Most Anti-Federalists were in the working class, debtors, poor, and people living in the backcountry or rural areas. The well-known Anti-Federalists at this time were Patrick Henry and Sam Adams. Federalists and Anti-Federalist were different in many ways and each believed that their form of government was best for them and the United States, but money played a big role in their decisions also. Document A, written by James Madison, supports Federalism. It talks about how to remove a faction and how to cure its outcomes.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Robert Yates was a politician and judge best known for his Anti-Federalist views along with being known as the presumed author of political essays, which were published in 1787 and 1788, under the pseudonyms "Brutus" and "Sydney". His political career is one that challenged many while preparing others through his own schools of thought. Yates was part of the organization that formed the Constitution of the United States, was a New York representative from 1785 until 1787 serving in the general congress, and in 1808 he was appointed as Master in Chancery. Yates was also present at the 1787 Philadelphia meeting of the Constitutional Convention, but left early because of his anti-federalist views and refused to sign the Constitution. (“Delegates

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalist Papers were written to elucidate the U.S. Constitution, and what the Constitution would do for America. The 39th paper was authored by James Madison, and he wrote it to clarify that the government included national and federal characteristics. Madison reasoned that the Constitution mentioned that “each state, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act.” Therefore, the government would not entirely be run by the central government like many perceived it would. Madison begins his paper with the definition he clarified of a republican government and then bring out the question that several people had pondered, which was if the Constitution

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-Federalist were correct that the Bill of Rights was necessary to guard citizens from tyranny. Anti-Federalist wanted to have a limited government to protect against tyranny because to much power in one hand could limit the right to the people. To prevent this a constitution was created to divide power and keep the government in check. The constitution was a document that states and the government acknowledge and with hold. Although this happened the Anti-Federalist argue that the Bill of Rights were need to safeguard the liberty of the people, but Federalist argued that the constitution did not need a Bill of Rights because the people and the stares kept any power not given to the federal government.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Factions and Federalist Essay No. 10 The federalist papers were a series of 85 essays written to convince the citizens of New York to ratify the constitution. Federalist essay No.10, written by James Madison, discusses political factions and their effects. Madison’s definition of a faction is clearly stated in the essay.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

Related Topics

Open Document