ipl-logo

Rockville Argument Analysis

421 Words2 Pages

The given argument is WCQP radio station in Rockville has increased number of audience due to increased call-in advice programs. The radio station KICK is advised to do the same to gain larger audience in Medway. To evaluate this argument we need significant amount of information, which can strengthen or weaken the argument. Firstly, the argument is talking about two different radio stations WCQP and KICK which are in two cities Rockville and Medway. We need to compare audience in both cities. There are many possibilities, for example, there is a possibility that Rockville is urban area where people like to call and like to participate in different talk shows on radio and Medway is rural area where people don't have much interest in talk shows, and they might like more entertainment programs, such as music, news. We need this information to evaluate the argument, if there is significant difference between audience of both cities, then adding more call-in advice programs might not help KICK radio station listeners. Next question on this argument is what is the status of WCQP audience right now. The …show more content…

Are there questions specific to call-in advice programs or it was just general about all the programs. Does it ask information from people that they are connected to WCQP only due to call-in advice program or there is any other reason. The survey might include just one question which ration station do you like? and people just chose they like WCQP. Thus, before reaching any conclusion it is necessary to get more information about survey. Thus, all the above mentioned questions can question conclusion of the argument. The answers may support or may not support the argument. Therefore, before reaching any conclusion, first gather all the information required to answer above questions, which will help to reach on right

Show More
Related

Chris Mccandless Callarman Argument Analysis

701 Words | 3 Pages

Callarman’s argument is that Chris McCandless made a lot of mistakes because he was arrogant and that he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness and he says that he was just crazy. I disagree with Callarman’s argument because I think that Chris McCandless (Alexander Supertramp) was not arrogant I think that he just wanted to learn new things. I also disagree because I think that Chris did have a reason to go to Alaska or else he would not have done it even if it just to go because he likes nature, and I don’t think that he was crazy at the beginning but I agree that he did start to get crazy when he was stuck in the wild on the bus. I don’t think that Chris is arrogant I think that he is just a guy who wants to learn new things about nature and just the world in general.

Read More

Gatto Argument Analysis

360 Words | 2 Pages

Gatton believes that The point Gatto argument begin to emerge is that students are getting borned in school easily and also are the teachers. He talks about how Then he started to question “Do we really need school”? On page 684.Then he goes on to talk about how school is five days a week and nine months and twelve years. He talks about how students are not really learning they are just inputting information and then outputting it back to the teaches which is not learning. Gatto even goes on to mention a few famous people that did not go through the schooling system such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln,Thomas Jefferson.

Read More

Summary Of The Pleasantville School Should Require Students To Complete 40 Hours Of Community Service

246 Words | 1 Pages

The argument that the Pleasantville School should require students to complete 40 hours of community service prior to graduation is built on some weak assumptions that fail to support the point and convince the reader. and it also misses some major points in discussing the issue in hand. First , the argument mentions that the number of teenage volunteers has declined, but it doesn`t investigate the reasons that made teenagers refuse the community services. it would be better for the writer to tell us what caused the problem in order to know what would the best solution to it be.

Read More

Norcross's Argument Analysis

538 Words | 3 Pages

Norcross believe that one should not eat meat that is raised in a factory. He uses an argument about torturing puppies and eating their brains. Although his argument about Fred and his extreme cruelty to feel the sensation of eating chocolate is cruel, it puts one in a state of mind to pay close attention to his point. What is his point? Eating animals that are raised in factories are just is cruel as torturing puppies for one’s own pleasure.

Read More

Circleville Argument Analysis

921 Words | 4 Pages

I strategically used a poll to survey the opinions of three citizens with varying relations to receive a small representative sample. I attempted to contact others, who did not reply back to my questions. I also worded my questions purposefully in order to create a positive connotation to having a city pool, and proposed the idea of placing a new pool by the Pickaway County YMCA as a possible idea, which I will further explain in my resolution. A social desirability bias was prevented, because all three of my interviews were in private, without letting either of the other participants know what results I had previously concluded. When I asked my three participants about the benefits of having a city pool in Circleville, I was given three similar

Read More

Bonneau's Argument Analysis

448 Words | 2 Pages

Bonneau found that state supreme court campaign spending was driven by the characteristics of race, institutional arrangements, and the electoral and state supreme court context. There were moments when he defended his position well, but then moments when he did not. A few of his hypotheses were disproved, either as having intervening factors or spurious. The main strength in Bonneau’s argument was that he gave many comparisons and contrasts of the state judicial systems.

Read More

Rogerian Argument Analysis

100 Words | 1 Pages

A Rogerian Argument takes a subject that two sides differ on and instead of arguing directly for one side without referring to the other, the author states the opposing view point. By taking a “your side is valid but my point is valid as well and here’s why” approach to the structuring of the essay or writing, the author takes a less aggressive approach and empathizes with the other side in order to reach a middle ground. This type of argument is a better approach to conflict resolution since the author sympathizes or recognizes the other side’s point of

Read More

Zhuangzi's Argument Analysis

838 Words | 4 Pages

It is extremely ironic that in his writings, Zhuangzi often employs language and logical argument to undermine the usefulness of language and logical argument. Setting aside the problem of this possible inconsistency, here I will explain Zhuangzi’s argument regarding truth and human capacity–or lack thereof–to understand it. Zhuangzi begins by describing a familiar situation: You and I have opposing views on a topic and argue to figure out who is right and who is wrong. Suppose one of us “wins” the debate–that is to say, one of us makes an argument to which the other can give no satisfactory response. Now, Zhuangzi poses the rhetorical question: Is the winner necessarily right and the loser necessarily wrong?

Read More

Leonid's Argument Analysis

411 Words | 2 Pages

The author develops his argument by including fact,comparison, and real life situations that happen today. For example when the author said "many students are ashamed to admit to their friends how much they study. " Thats a known situation because in society today, if someone wastes time studying, then they are considered a loser. I think Leonid Fridman's argument is to stand up for those nerds/geeks who are not being known for their accolades/achievements.

Read More

Rogerian Argument Analysis

233 Words | 1 Pages

Every method of argument attempts to convince another party that one viewpoint are superior, or offers a better alternative than what has already been presented. The difference lies in the purpose of the argument, whom it is intended for, as well as the context or occasion in which the argument takes place. Where and how each method can be employed depends on situations across the spectrum (either for school or work, in the mass media or with friends, etc), in order to present effective and verifiable assertions. Rogerian Argument can be used when “winning” is not the intention of the whole argument, i.e when finding a middle-ground is the next best alternative. I can apply this method when a given issue is too complex for only one solution

Read More

SU Fandom Summary

1436 Words | 6 Pages

The survey was

Read More

Chamberlin's Argument Analysis

708 Words | 3 Pages

Chamberlin’s arguments were typically not against the entire idea that Wegener formulated but primarily the fact that it was weak. He believed that his theory was untenable in a sense that it couldn’t be defended from attack or objections. His thesis is claiming that his theory is too general in a sense that it may be describing what’s happening but does nothing more than that considering he doesn’t postulate any ideas as to why that may be happening. Furthermore, he sees his argument as possibly solving many of the questions that arose from the previous paradigm that was already deteriorating but instead brings about more questions around in regard to mountain formation and the overall movement of land masses. He then makes an attempt to answer

Read More

Pereboom's Argument Analysis

984 Words | 4 Pages

In modern society, a lot of situations are not caused by free will like everyone likes to believe they have, but rather as a result of different preexisting events. These deterministic events are said to be a sequential cause as opposed to Rousseau 's dubbed "first cause"1 in which the cause of the event is not reliant on an external event. These sequential events are a prime example of the deterministic viewpoint on the free will debate, forming the angle that most situations are caused by preexisting forces, and most everything is just predetermined and the "free" will choices we do get are still influenced by these forces or new forces. Based on this assumption that free will doesn’t exist in its truest meaning of the word, Pereboom sets out to prove that the losses of

Read More

Today's Lesson Argumentative Analysis

980 Words | 4 Pages

The rivalry between students who believe they should be able to use their cell phones in class and teachers who believe them to be disrespectful has caused a ripple effect that now bleeds through many classrooms roaring its controversial head. And here we are stuck in an ongoing battle seldom won by students. The position that students should not be able to misuse their cell phones in a classroom setting is one held by the author of “Today 's Lesson: Life in the Classroom Before Cellphones” Louise Katz, who believes that “those halcyon days” were over (Katz). Likewise, Zoya Kahn, the author of “Why Cell Phones Do Not Belong In The Classroom” has a similar stance on the topic, Kahn states that “it is in everyone’s interest for instructors to

Read More

Alzen And Fishbeein's Theory Of Reasoned Action

1364 Words | 6 Pages

The questionnaire was designed in lined with the objectives of the study. It has sections, with each section eliciting information on the research question. The questionnaire has first introductory part, where the researcher introduces herself to her respondents, instructing them on what is expected of them and how to answer the questions. Section “A” of the questionnaire has to do with the socio-demographic data of the respondents.

Read More

More about Rockville Argument Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document