Roe Vs. Wade Pros And Cons

Continuing with another secondary effect, the ability to abort without defying the Constitution was advertised to have saved the lives of pregnant females. Kate Chopin (1993) used personal experiences with maternal mortalities to reference childbirth and pregnancy in The Awakening (p. 1). Chopin encountered four loved ones pass away during childbirth. These tragedies occurred in the late 1890s to early 1900s, long before medical practices could diagnose issues with a pregnancy. Until the late 1900s, abortions were not safe enough to guarantee that the mother would live from the procedure. In actuality, tragedies like the ones Chopin experienced could not have been prevented until time eventually revealed medicines for safe pregnancies as well

Wade; although, there were many discussions and protests regarding the final court case decision. However, if Roe v. Wade were to have been overturned, not many changes would have come from it. Daniel Allott (2011) collected opinions on the debate from experts, including a thought from abortion trend studier Michael New that hypothesized if Roe v. Wade were to have been reversed, the legal status of abortion would not be notably changed; however, it would have lead to many more debates concerning movements such as the pro-life movement (p. 96). Allott also included an instance that compared two states, South Dakota and California, to prove that the number of abortions would not have decreased if the case was overturned. Citizens and lawmakers of South Dakota are typically pro-life and only two abortion facilities were formed in the state; hence, even if Roe v. Wade was reversed, a scare number of women would have actually obtained an abortion in South Dakota (Allott, 2011, p. 94). In California, however, an abortion facility was built in almost every county, which contributed to a very high abortion rate. That rate would not have been effected much if Roe v. Wade was overturned since California created a law stating that “any interference with a woman exercising her right to obtain an abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the life and health of the woman” was prohibited (Allott, 2011, p. 95). Altogether, the outcome of Roe v. Wade benefited many important aspects of the United