Moreover, it discovered that she visited the clinic on three occasions during her leave and took clinic supplies home after each visit. Because her conduct violated its code of conduct, the clinic decided to terminate her employment after conducting an investigation. Additionally, there was no evidence that the clinic knowingly tolerated similar conduct by other employees. The court agreed with the clinic, stating that Bloom shouldn't be "shielded" from the consequences for her misconduct simply because she was on FMLA leave.
From: Ashlee Nong HCA 340 To: Professor Schipske 06 October 2017 Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., Supreme Court of Arizona 70 P.3d 435, 2003 1. The complete title and citation of the case: Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging Ltd., 70 P. 3d 435 (2003). 2. Explain which court decided this case: Supreme Court of Arizona decided this case. The Court of Appeals maintained the trial judge's decisions, yet the Supreme Court concurred with Duncan that the Medical Malpractice Act arrangement which bars misbehavior claims in view of battery abuses the Arizona Constitution's assurance for the privilege to sue.
In order for job/position of the defendant in relation to plaintiff to be established the defendant must hold a job or position that is in relation to the plaintiff in order for a legal obligation to be established. In this case the defendants Matthew Hartley was operating a motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner, operating a vehicle under the influence and leaving the scene of a crash and killed the plaintiff, Mollie Mahowald throwing her 20 or 30 feet in the air. Therefore, the defendant does not owe the plaintiff a legal obligations based off the job/position relationship.
The case of R. v. Schoenborn is a troubling case involving the death of three children and the defence of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. This defence must be critically analyzed along with the evidence and expert opinions as it could absolve the accused of the charges. As well, the precedent that the verdict provides is critical to the legal system and its future implication and thus give the decision more importance. After a thorough examination of the facts, it is evident that the verdict of the Supreme Court of British Columbia is correct and reflects the administration’s objectives and beliefs. This will be demonstrated through the application of legal principles and elements.
In 1884, the Métis people sought help from Louis Riel to help them grab the attention of the Canadian government who had been ignoring their complaints and petitions, and treating them as lower class citizens. They needed Riel to be the effective voice to speak on their behalf in order to obtain rights to elections and such so that their land was not threatened by immigrants from the east due to past experiences. After attempting to fight the Battle of Batoche, he was accused of high treason, and a five-day trial was held of which Riel had pleaded guilty and was then sentenced to death. The trial of Louis Riel suffered many imperfections and did not contain the number of merits as one would have thought. Riel was deprived of justice and mercy
Robert Yates was an Anti federalist and did not support the constitution. He arrived at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787, but decided to leave early due to the fact that he did not believe in adopting a federal Constitution and left on July 10, 1787. He did not believe in a strong central government and did not have a position in the new Federal Government. He was against any concession to the federal congress that might lessen the sovereignty of the states. He stated this all in a letter with John Langston that was written to Governor George Clinton of New York, stating the dangers of centralizing power and urging opposition to the adoption of the Constitution.
Why does she think she can break the Hippocratic Oath, and use an unapproved drug on adolescent females? Nurse G obviously screwed up when s he sterilized Tracy Sands.
The “Harrison Bergeron”: The limitations of excessive legislation The “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut is a great work of satirical science fiction. It describes the equality has finally settled in the society by limiting people’s development, especially for someone who is intelligent. The story is worth people thinking about the phenomenon of extreme equality in the society today. In general, excessive legislation plays a huge important role to promote equality, notwithstanding it indirectly brings huge burden to the people on the basis of keeping equality.
Management of Care Case Study Josepha is working on a medical surgical unit with three other RNs and one LPN. There is also a male and a female patient care tech. Josepha has been a nurse for four months, and after completing two months of orientation she takes a full assignment as a registered nurse. Josepha feels that the assignments she receives are not always fair, as she tends to get the most challenging clients.
Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.
The aide did her job, addressed a possible issue to her administrator, and followed rules set by that administrator. Herman suffered the most. He was lonely, sad, and felt unsafe. He was a war veteran and an elderly man. Although not positive, he could have had PTSD and depression, which could have been evaluated and assessed if it had been acted upon.
Margaret Fuller fights for equality in her essay The Great Lawsuit. She discusses the idea that women are equal in every way to men and deserve the rights that men get just by being born male. Fuller’s argument shares a lot of similarities with Emerson’s idea of self-reliance. She discusses the idea of one universal order, and the notion of leaving the past in the past so as to move forward, although Fuller does share some ideas with Emerson, her essay held a different meaning of self-reliance for women than it did for men. Margaret Fuller adopts Emerson’s idea of one universal order, and claims that “if the woman apparelled in flesh, to one master only are they accountable.
In the essay by Michael Sandel, from his book Markets and Morals, he explains how the free market is hurting families and taking over society. Sandel's purpose is to inform the reader on how money and markets are taking over our lives, becoming more important than morality, and hurting those who have less money. The purpose is shown all throughout the essay, and even in the first line when he says "There are some things money can't buy, but these days, not many," (Sandel 40). He further shows his purpose by discussing the Era of Market Triumphalism. Sandel made himself out to be intelligent and caring.
Moral Dilemma HOSPITAL: You started your first job at a large hospital. You are assigned a patient to treat who no one wants to work with because the patient always says “NO”. The Occupational Therapy team leader tells you that you need to treat the patient because the doctor is angry that the patient has not been receiving therapy. You are told that the patient’s nurse has called to complain to the therapy department about the fact that the patient has not been receiving therapy
To solve this issue Barbara needs to redefine a clear role among the nurses and make sure that the role is properly understand by all her staff. She must include advice from her staff to insure that the role definition fit within her unit. She also need to develop a transparent communication mechanism to solve any role
