Rogers Vs Koons Analysis

153 Words1 Pages
Rogers vs Koons The Photographer Art Rogers shot a photograph of a couple holding a line of puppies in a row and sold it. The well-known artist Jeff Koons in the process of creating an exhibit on the banality of everyday items, ran across Rodgers’ photograph and used it to create a set of statues based on the image. Koons sold several of these structures, making a significant profit. Upon discovering the copy, Rodgers sued Koons for copyright. Koons responded by claiming fair use by parody. The court found the similarities between the 2 images too close. Koon’s defense was rejected under the argument that he could have used a more generic source to make the same statement without copying Rogers’ work. Koons was forced to pay a monetary settlement