ipl-logo

Roman Government Essay

511 Words3 Pages

In 509 BCE in the center of Rome, Etruscans were the leaders of the Romans for decades, but the
Romans wanted their own leadership so they conquered the Etruscans and absorbed some of their social dynamics and everyday trade. When the Romans won their freedom they decided to create a republic. This involved their citizens making the decisions to decide who gets to represent them. Even though the Romans created a republic, democracy is different where instead of elected representation, democracy is the citizens are required to have more active participation in the government (ushistory.org, 2023). In the Roman republic males that are 15 years of age descended from the original tribe became citizens. There was no written documentation that help create their new …show more content…

In Rome, during the Republic, there were social and political differences between the aristocratic patricians and the lower class. One similarity of Democracy is that women could not vote or be a part of the government. Slaves pretty much had no rights. When Rome started to take off the city-state was very much like Athens but grow larger. Over time Rome would be the significant leader of the Mediterranean lands (Shiffer, 2021). Polybius a historian discussed how
Rome’s strength and perseverance came from its mixed systems like its kingship, aristocracy, and democracy. Just like the government here in America, the Romans had three elements that had powers that were to help keep the government regulated. In each Roman government power democracy was very important but only when one of the three parts of the Roman government was made sure to keep the straight and narrow and not overpower the other two parts this wascontrolled by kingship and aristocracy. He also believed that having mixed systems caused the prevention of revolutionary uproar (Brown, 2016). What made me question the Roman
Republic’s democratic nature were parts of democracy and their Republic. Even though

Show More
Related
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman empire was a prosperous empire that flourished between the years 27 BC - 476 AD. However, there were many internal and external factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire. Some internal factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire included their financial strains, and the people starting to distrust each other. Some external factors that contributed to the downfall of the Roman empire include constant pressure from the northern world, and Rome’s army not being able to compete with other armies.

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

Athens, Rome, Han China, and Ancient Egypt all have similar and different geography, history and government. First in Athens they had a Direct democracy. In Athens they picked 500 men to come together and vote. In Rome they had a Republic. Because they had so much land each section had to have their citizens vote for a representative.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

After the surprise attacks on Pearl Harbor and a sighting of a Japanese submarine off of the San Francisco Bay in 1942, American wartime industries on the West Coast felt exposed to another Japanese air attack. Another attack would result in lost lives, equipment, and potentially entire factories. Thousands of dollars’ worth of equipment, training, and industry: gone in a single action. These factories wanted to protect themselves without compromising work flow. However, hiding single items of large size never worked.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic lasted from 509 B.C.E to 27 B.C.E. The Roman Republic was democratic, but not always. Such as when the wealthy took over, it was more difficult to become a Roman citizen, and there was a lot of division in the society. However it was still democratic because they let the majority of legal men vote, even the free slaves later on, the people had a voice, and everyone mainly had a job to do in order to help the community. The Roman Republic tried to be democratic, but then it led to it just being an aristocracy.

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The Fall of the Roman Empire In ancient Rome there was a lot of change that was always happening. Around 50 BCE until 200 CE the Roman empire was the key to everyone's problems in the Mediterranean world. Some of the changes in the Roman empire caused death and assassinations.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

It was very powerful ,after revolting against the Etruscans and becoming a republic, due to its geography being both ocean and surrounding mountains protecting them from competing forces. The place that I believe has a less far system was Athens which was located in Greece and had a population of around 300,000 at its peak. Both Athens and Rome had a democracy but in two very different ways which some of them are why I believe Rome had a better method of citizenship. In my opinion Rome was better than Athens, in this category, because Rome allowed more

Read More
237 Words | 1 Pages

Who I believe should be named “Person of the Decade” is Ronald Reagan. Reagan was elected in 1980 to be the new President of the United States. He wanted to end the Cold War and he took every precaution to do so. He believed that communism was corrupt and oppressive. He created a policy known as the Reagan Doctrine which gave aid to nations fighting the spread of communism.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

Also, Rome follows in Greece's footsteps. For example, Livy once said, “And no wonder: for if we confine our observation to the power of the Consuls we should be inclined to regard it as despotic; if on that of the Senate, as aristocratic; and if finally one looks at the power possessed by the people it would seem a clear case of democracy” (Doc. B). This shows that Rome follows in Greece’s footsteps because even though Rome was considered a democracy, in actuality, the senate acted as an aristocracy, because in both a small group of elites ruled. The councils acted as a despotism, because both have one or more elected officials, with great power.

Read More
1867 Words | 8 Pages

Even though

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

In 509 B.C.E. the Romans had taken back their own rule that the Etruscans had maintained for Decades(RR). A republic was formed after the Romans were in control again that gave the people a say in how the state was run(RR). Many countries had copied this form of government including the United States(RR). The Romans also had the three branches of government. The executive legislative, and judicial branch.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

In a representative democracy, citizens choose representatives to vote on laws and make political choices.   In ancient Rome, many political leaders and historians claimed that the government was a democracy. However, Rome was never truly a democracy, due to their unfair government organization, and lack of democratic citizenship. In terms of government career holders, and as regular citizens, some groups of people were more powerful and privileged than others.       To start off, the government of ancient Rome was far from democratic.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

3. Compare and contrast the idea of democracy in Ancient Greece and Rome. Which system was more democratic and why? Democracy is the modern day standard for governmental systems. However up until 500 BCE, the concept of Democracy was a foreign concept, and the great civilizations of that era were run by monarchs, aristocrats, and religious leaders of sorts.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

Although one of their best ideas was known as the type of government they established what is now known as the republic, and since then it has been copied by other places, the united states uses and has similarity to roman republic. The U.S government is based partly on the model of Rome’s. the parts and similarity’s that we still use today are things like citizenship, legal code, legislative branch /senate, and others. The republic all started when the romans finally overthrew the Etruscan conquerors they had around (509 B.C.E) once they were free the romans came up or established the republic, a government were the citizens picked a representative to rule on their behalf. The concept of Citizenship in Rome was that males of ages 15 or older, that came from original tribes or places of Rome became citizens.

Read More

More about Roman Government Essay

Related Topics

Open Document