In 509 BCE in the center of Rome, Etruscans were the leaders of the Romans for decades, but the
Romans wanted their own leadership so they conquered the Etruscans and absorbed some of their social dynamics and everyday trade. When the Romans won their freedom they decided to create a republic. This involved their citizens making the decisions to decide who gets to represent them. Even though the Romans created a republic, democracy is different where instead of elected representation, democracy is the citizens are required to have more active participation in the government (ushistory.org, 2023). In the Roman republic males that are 15 years of age descended from the original tribe became citizens. There was no written documentation that help create their new
…show more content…
In Rome, during the Republic, there were social and political differences between the aristocratic patricians and the lower class. One similarity of Democracy is that women could not vote or be a part of the government. Slaves pretty much had no rights. When Rome started to take off the city-state was very much like Athens but grow larger. Over time Rome would be the significant leader of the Mediterranean lands (Shiffer, 2021). Polybius a historian discussed how
Rome’s strength and perseverance came from its mixed systems like its kingship, aristocracy, and democracy. Just like the government here in America, the Romans had three elements that had powers that were to help keep the government regulated. In each Roman government power democracy was very important but only when one of the three parts of the Roman government was made sure to keep the straight and narrow and not overpower the other two parts this wascontrolled by kingship and aristocracy. He also believed that having mixed systems caused the prevention of revolutionary uproar (Brown, 2016). What made me question the Roman
Republic’s democratic nature were parts of democracy and their Republic. Even though