ipl-logo

Roman Republic Checks And Balances

796 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Democracy in ancient rome

The Roman Republic was a very effective governance structure that lasted for more than five centuries before it fell and was replaced by the Roman Empire. Corruption, economic instability, and military conquest are only a few of the elements that scholars believe contributed to the decline of the Republic. Therefore, in my opinion, the most important element was the dissolution of the Roman political system's checks and balances, which allowed ambitious people to take control and undermine the Republic's democratic institutions.

The Roman Republic was built on the idea of mixed government, which included a system of checks and balances to prevent any one person or party from gaining excessive power. Two consuls who were elected yearly and shared executive authority as well as the right to override one another's decisions were the foundation of the political structure of the Roman Republic. The richest and most powerful men in Rome made up the Senate, which worked alongside the consuls to advise them and approve the legislation. A popular assembly made up of citizens also existed in the Roman Republic, and it had the authority to elect officials and enact laws (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2023). It was the goal of the power distribution among the consuls, Senate, and popular assembly to …show more content…

One approach would have been to increase the influence of the plebeian assembly, which represented the general populace and might serve as a check on the Senate's authority. Early in the Republic, the plebeian assembly wielded considerable power, but as the Republic grew increasingly oligarchic, its influence diminished (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2023). The Republic may have avoided the consolidation of power in the hands of a few powerful families by granting the plebeian assembly more

Show More
Related

Roman Republic Dbq Analysis

327 Words | 2 Pages

Rome’s constitution had three different elements which held independent powers and shared their ideas to prove the constitution was democratic. The consuls and magistrates were the supreme masters of government and called together the People’s Assemblies to carry out whatever the majority of what the Assemblies decided (Doc A). Polybius also greatly admired how the Romans structured their

Read More

How Democratic Was The Roman Republic Dbq

690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

Read More

Athens Vs Rome Dbq Essay

734 Words | 3 Pages

(Document F) As stated in and reflected in a fresco of the Roman Senate by artist Macari (Document F), the Senate had responsibilities and rights, among others, to control war, make foreign alliances, as well as control of public lands among others. While the Greeks may have had more equal representation, it was only through a quorum that they could conduct business (Document E). Athens also ostracized people who became powerful and were seen as a threat, and it was difficult to fulfill their responsibilities of citizenship (Document

Read More

How Democratic Was The Roman Republic Dbq

515 Words | 3 Pages

As stated by Polybius in Document A, The Assembly held most power when it came to voting. They had the final say during the passing or denying of laws, which was said by Millar (Document B). However, Millar also states that the Assemblies did not get to choose who or what they voted on. This could be used to support the idea that the Roman Republic truly was a republic. Regardless of that, the fact that the Assembly held so much power was still a reason to believe it was a democracy.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Roman Senate

2227 Words | 9 Pages

When issue arose or the outcry of the people demanded it, the Senate would come together and propose the new legislation. After hearing both the Yay or Nay arguments a vote would occur on the newly proposed legislation. Any of the elected officials be it Magistrates, Senators or Consuls at that time could promulgate the new legislation before the Senate. This however was not a fast process as there was ways to slow down the legislation process, Romans would call this a The Fabian Tactic, and even more so noted by Mr. Romeo as “interesting to learn, for instance, that the filibuster was already an established stalling technique in the Roman Senate” (Romeo,

Read More

How Democratic Was The Roman Republic Dbq

736 Words | 3 Pages

By this time, it took more effort to vote since people were coming from all over to vote. Rome started to add limits, “How easily a small number of urban residents registered in a rural tribe could determine the vote of that tribe is clear from the small percentage of citizens who actually voted.” (Document C) This shows how little the number of people voted that were actually Roman citizens. The Roman Republic started to become an aristocracy whenever a lot more of the wealthy people came into power.

Read More

Similarities Between Han China And Roman Empires

932 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate was a group of legislators that was selected from the elite and wealthy class The Senate had two co consults to keep each other in balance There was a dictator that controlled everything when the Republic was in danger Caesar conquered several lands with the help of Pompey and Crassus By 48 BCE, Caesar was in control of all of Rome’s holdings

Read More

How Did Polybius Show The Perceptiveness Of Rome's Mixed Government

972 Words | 4 Pages

The kingship (or monarchy) would be represented by the consuls, the aristocracy by Senate, and democracy be represented by the assemblies. By complementing one another, this would ensure that the government would work efficiently without having any party rising to sole power. The effectiveness of this government was so overwhelming, even Polybius admitted that this led to “nearly the whole world fell under the power of Rome in somewhat less than 53 years – an event certainly without precedent” (Polybius, VI.

Read More

How Did Greek Government And Culture Influence Western Government

908 Words | 4 Pages

This shift was not in the form of a sudden revolution, and rather grew as a gradual switch from a monarchy previously under the Etruscans. The republic stood for liberty and extended citizenship of the people. In the Roman republic, the people chose officials to represent their interests. Dominating the government was a senate that was primarily made up of the wealthy, landholding class, known as patricians. This outraged the lower class plebeians, who later gained power and elected their own officials.

Read More

Roman Republic Checks And Balances

815 Words | 4 Pages

Notwithstanding these democratic components, the Roman Republic's aristocracy-dominated governance made it ultimately undemocratic. The Senate, which was predominately made up of nobles, held the majority of the republic's power. This indicated that very few people actually influenced the decisions that the government made. (National Geographic Society,

Read More

Roman Empire Dbq

1274 Words | 6 Pages

The constant change of emperors caused disorganization in the empire along with the injustices between the wealthy and poor as the wealthy could just bribe their way out of punishment and the government officials would accept the bribes from the rich, followed by severe taxing from the government because they needed to hire Germanic soldiers after their military soldier population decreased by natural disasters while inflation was going on from the government who were devaluing the coin by adding less silver with the wages staying the same, so some Romans switched to bartering and with bartering they didn’t have to pay the severe taxes leading them not being able to hire Germanic soldiers and other state expenses with invasions happening overtime but the Roman army not being able to defend against it because of them neglecting to practice with armor, and soldiers running away against unpredictable attackers with the disorganization within the military from constant emperor changes, furthermore Rome’s military population went down because of diseases and without people paying those severe taxes led to Rome’s fall.. When Rome’s Rome’s fall can be an example of what a society should have and shouldn't. The problems that Rome had should not happen unless it's a country that’s

Read More

Why Did The Roman Republic Fall

913 Words | 4 Pages

“Why did the Roman Republic fall?” The Roman Republic did not fall simply from one cause, rather many external pressures that brought on political instability and destruction. There were multiple pressures that lead to the downfall of Rome including ambitious generals, changing politics, client armies, and a desolate Senate desperate to remain prominent. Many significant people of the time, who wrote letters and speeches on ancient Rome, help to build detailed recollections of the political warfare that took place between 78-31BC.

Read More

How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

744 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Senate was composed of 300 members, who were chosen from the most prominent families in Rome. The Senate was responsible for making laws and advising the consuls, and its members served for life. In addition to the Senate, there were also other assemblies of the people, such as the Comitia Centuriata, which was responsible for electing consuls and passing laws. Undemocratic Practices of the Republic While the Roman Republic was characterized by democratic elements, it was also marked by undemocratic practices. One of the most significant of these was the exclusion of plebeians from political power.

Read More

Roman Republic Research Paper

693 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.

Read More

Greek And Roman Government's Influence On Modern Civilization

544 Words | 3 Pages

The General Assembly and Senate established a sense of importance in Rome. The General Assembly was made up of Plebeians, and the Senate consists of Patricians. The terms General Assembly and Senate are two of many terms still used in the US Government today. The Romans were led by a king who was approved by the senate and a vote of the people, which is also displayed in the US Government. This is displayed in our presidential elections.

Read More

More about Roman Republic Checks And Balances

Related Topics

Open Document