ipl-logo

Ronald Clark Vs Chicago School

749 Words3 Pages

When the Chicago School opened it gave enlightenment to corruption within the world. The two “derivatives” focused on different aspects on how to prevent crime and the causes. Ronald Clark strongly believed that there preventives for wrongful activities. However, Cohen and Felson blamed most crimes are committed by youths. Both theories place emphasis on the relationship among touchable valuables and the activities of people on a daily basis.

The Chicago School came into existence in 1920. The reason for the development was to learn how to connect criminology with aspects of the surroundings of individuals, different animals, and various types of living plants. The study conducted by the Chicago School was comprised from a display used in …show more content…

76). Both theories base their philosophy from the “classical theory”. In terms of the “situational crime prevention theory”, the laboring for this concept is given credit to Clark. Clark maintained his dispute that there are two ways to decrease criminal activities. Individuals could do something about their expensive assets that they don’t put away and not leave their doors unlocked so anyone can utilize the entrances keep their doors locked. In addition, people can make themselves safer by observing individuals’ walking habits and watch one’s surroundings while they are in a parking area. A suspect has a chance of stopped in their tracks by people and officers of the law if they take the necessary precautions to guard against crime. Clark did not hesitate to share his concept with the “Chicago School”. Clark believed that crime rates are higher within communities that have low income housing such as HUD. On the other hand, those who have better monetary means live in areas that are nicer and crime is rated lower. Clark’s project would help bring the community together as whole; …show more content…

Cisneros and Neman did not have much hope for the areas that were historical. I also would include in my lecture the “routine activity theory” for which Cohen and Felson who contributed their philosophies. Cohen and Felson believed that people commit crime because of male adolescents and those out of work. Individuals who are on drugs add to criminal activities. Of course when youngsters do what they want because governs them, then they will get into trouble most likely. Cohn and Felson also agreed that lack of police surveillance and safety devices aided in wrongful acts. Although Cohn and Felson do not try to give an explanation regarding crime, they do contend that the problem will continue if there are no precautionary measures. Did corruption start within civilization? As far as Cohen and Felson’s views, illegal tasks are everyday habits. If something does not take to prevent future criminals, then they will fall into the trap of being a felon (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). According to (Bohm & Vogel (2011), “Another problem with routine activity theory is that it fails to explains its key concept—routine activities” (p. 78). It is questionable as to which routine

Show More
Related
1206 Words | 5 Pages

Within the past couple of decades, criminologists have developed different criminological theories that apply to the social behaviors and decisions of criminals. One of the earliest theories developed regarding criminality is the rational choice theory, in which describes the rationalization of determining if the rewards from committing the crime outweigh the consequences. In Scarver’s case, his decision to engage in criminal activities outweighed the potential consequences, or the other alternatives if he did not engage in such criminal activities. In addition to the rational choice theory, Scarver’s criminality can be related to the social disorganization theory, which describes the influence of one’s social and physical environment on one’s decision to commit a crime. Lastly, the strain theory can be related to Scarver’s criminality as well, as it is used to describe an individual who lacks the means to obtain such goals, and aspirations, so therefore, he or she engages in criminal activities to acquire the goals.

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Having received genetic markers for violent tendencies and aggression from his parents and lacking a supportive and caring home were contributing factors which ultimately added to the outcome of Kuklinski. It is interesting that in comparing Kuklinski’s case to the Chicago School Theories, it would appear that as a youth residing in what would appear to be a zone 2, Kuklinski’s behavior was consistent with that which was anticipated for the area; however, as he gained affluence and moved from zone 2 to that of zone 4 or 5, the outward appearance of criminal behavior diminished as predicted, although as indicated reported activities in these zones were not accurately recorded . As stated by Shaw & McKay, delinquency was the result of environmental factors associated with particular neighborhoods, and such factors within the environment affected the behavior of the delinquents, citing (1) the absence or lack of controls for delinquents; (2) The behaviors are often condoned/ sanctioned by parents or other adults in the neighborhood; (3) the readily availability of opportunities to commit such unacceptable behaviors; and (4) lack of motivation, training, or opportunity for gainful employment (Bohm & Vogel,

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

As seen in the Nightline clips about gang violence in Chicago, the inner city has been submerged in crime, drug abuse, and a culture of poverty. In order to reduce crime rates and the cycle of urban poverty, I believe that more job training and internship programs should be implemented in and around inner city areas like Chicago. Social structure theory is a view that states that the primary cause of crime is disadvantaged economic class position. The levels of crime and poverty portrayed in the Nightline clips of Chicago positively support this theory. Another view that is discussed in chapter 6 of the textbook is called differential opportunity.

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

The Chicago Metropolitan Area has an unfortunate reputation for being dangerous, particularly in certain regions of the city, such as the south side and the west side. Generally, crime rates can be explained by a number of factors, such as education, income, politics, and more; however, explaining how those factors have come to be and how they influence the safety of a city can be a bit more complex. When examining both historical and modern policies, it becomes possible to discover the correlation between these policies and the factors such as education and income that can be seen influencing crime rates in modern cities. To break this down further, the West Chicago neighborhood, West Garfield Park, will be examined to see if a correlation

Read More
1457 Words | 6 Pages

It is the means of understanding the human behaviour towards criminal activities and the ways through which it can be controlled. Moreover, the theory considers two factors that are situational factor and personal factor, which are the major reason behind formulation of the theory. Beccaria developed the theory to make it convenient for the people to understand the personal as well as situational factors through which crime rate is increasing. This is because it helps in minimising the rising impact of criminal

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, as society labels people who have committed a deviant act as ‘criminal’, Schur (1965) suggests that deviant acts such as drug use or any as Schur (1965) labels them as ‘victimless crimes’, should not be dealt with the full force of the law because it can be expensive and counter- productive (Muncie, 2010). On the contrary, Cohen (1973b) questioned who is responsible for labelling an act as deviant then later identified that political movement gain power over social actions and created criminal laws. Muncie (2010) sees crime as a political and ideological construction and that from social construction, laws, policies and social morals are the bases in which society is

Read More
1505 Words | 7 Pages

Third, I will explore Farrell 's critique of Hayward 's article and consider his arguments made in response to Hayward 's conclusions. Fourth, this paper will engage in its own critique of both Hayward 's and Farrell 's work and conclude with which article makes the most compelling argument. Tenets of Rational Choice Theory and Situational Crime Prevention Rational choice theory originated in the Classical School of thinking as it is based on the ideas of utilitarianism, which states that individuals make decisions that provide the greatest pleasure, as well as the ideas of free will and rational thought (Farrell and Hodgkinson, 2015). According to Farrell and

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

Criminology developed as a natural result of the evolution of theoretical ideas about crime and practical approaches to its prevention in the 19th century (Kerner, 1998). With the emergence of the Enlightenment and rationalism scientists employed knowledge to discover causes of crime and tried to

Read More
125 Words | 1 Pages

Schneider & Kitchen (2007), the situational crime prevention theory, was developed by Ronald V. Clark, (a Psychologist and Criminologist) who based his theory in part to his experience with juvenile offenders (pgs. 26-27). Clarks, situational crime prevention theory, includes three important theories: the routine activity theory, the rational choice theory, and the crime pattern theory. The routine activity theory, contends that most criminal acts are undertaken by motivated offenders against a target or potential victim, at a particular time and place, the rational choice theory, is based on opportunistic choices and decisions that criminals make in carrying out a criminal act, and the crime pattern theory, is based on what can influence

Read More
1967 Words | 8 Pages

Crime causation theories present society with a viewpoint, whereby criminal suspects are seen not for the crimes they

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

1. According to Robinson (2014), Cesare Beccaria who was an Italian mathematician in the 18th century and the English philosopher, Jeremy Bentham were the major contributors of the classical school of Criminology. This approach was developed explain crime and criminal behavior (Burke, H. R 2014). This suggest that the criminal behavior is a matter of personal choice that is made when a person has effectively considered the costs and benefits (Siegel, L.J. 2008).

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Under social disorganization theory, individuals from more disadvantaged areas are more susceptible to criminal activity. The Baltimore police department needs to have a comprehensive understanding of crime and that means being able to use various criminological theories to illuminate crime. If

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

The Chicago School of theory, in the 1920’s engaged in an effort to identify environmental factors associated with crime. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) “The Chicago School of Criminology is identified with neighborhood studies of crime and delinquency that focus particularly on the spatial patterns of such behavior, especially as reflected in maps of their spatial distributions” (Bursik, 2012, para. 2). Therefore, the Chicago School of criminological theory aimed to move past the simple hard line classical explanations of crime; therefore, introducing the idea of socialization as an explanation for criminal activity. (Act of Libraries, 2017)

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Criminal justice is a multidisciplinary field that encompasses various aspects of law enforcement, legal studies, and social sciences. It is concerned with the study of crime, its causes, prevention, and the administration of justice. As a graduate student in criminal justice, I have developed a deep understanding of the complexities and challenges faced by the criminal justice system. One of the fundamental aspects of criminal justice is the study of crime itself.

Read More
1877 Words | 8 Pages

This essay will discuss crime as both a social problem and a sociological problem. Crime is seen as a typical function of society. Crime doesn’t happen without society. It is created and determined by the surrounding society. According to the CSO, the number of dangerous and negligent acts committed between the years of 2008 and 2012 rose from 238’000 in 2008 to 257’000 in 2012.

Read More

More about Ronald Clark Vs Chicago School

Related Topics

Open Document