Ronald Clark Vs Chicago School

When the Chicago School opened it gave enlightenment to corruption within the world. The two “derivatives” focused on different aspects on how to prevent crime and the causes. Ronald Clark strongly believed that there preventives for wrongful activities. However, Cohen and Felson blamed most crimes are committed by youths. Both theories place emphasis on the relationship among touchable valuables and the activities of people on a daily basis.

The Chicago School came into existence in 1920. The reason for the development was to learn how to connect criminology with aspects of the surroundings of individuals, different animals, and various types of living plants. The study conducted by the Chicago School was comprised from a display used in

76). Both theories base their philosophy from the “classical theory”. In terms of the “situational crime prevention theory”, the laboring for this concept is given credit to Clark. Clark maintained his dispute that there are two ways to decrease criminal activities. Individuals could do something about their expensive assets that they don’t put away and not leave their doors unlocked so anyone can utilize the entrances keep their doors locked. In addition, people can make themselves safer by observing individuals’ walking habits and watch one’s surroundings while they are in a parking area. A suspect has a chance of stopped in their tracks by people and officers of the law if they take the necessary precautions to guard against crime. Clark did not hesitate to share his concept with the “Chicago School”. Clark believed that crime rates are higher within communities that have low income housing such as HUD. On the other hand, those who have better monetary means live in areas that are nicer and crime is rated lower. Clark’s project would help bring the community together as whole;

Cisneros and Neman did not have much hope for the areas that were historical. I also would include in my lecture the “routine activity theory” for which Cohen and Felson who contributed their philosophies. Cohen and Felson believed that people commit crime because of male adolescents and those out of work. Individuals who are on drugs add to criminal activities. Of course when youngsters do what they want because governs them, then they will get into trouble most likely. Cohn and Felson also agreed that lack of police surveillance and safety devices aided in wrongful acts. Although Cohn and Felson do not try to give an explanation regarding crime, they do contend that the problem will continue if there are no precautionary measures. Did corruption start within civilization? As far as Cohen and Felson’s views, illegal tasks are everyday habits. If something does not take to prevent future criminals, then they will fall into the trap of being a felon (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). According to (Bohm & Vogel (2011), “Another problem with routine activity theory is that it fails to explains its key concept—routine activities” (p. 78). It is questionable as to which routine