ipl-logo

Ryan Matthews Case

469 Words2 Pages

In the year 1997, a man named Vanhoose was shot four times for refusing to give a robber money from his store. The culprit then fled the crime scene and jumped into the passenger’s seat of a car while taking off his mask. Numerous witnesses saw this criminal leave the crime scene, including a woman who later identified a seventeen year old named Ryan Matthews as the gunman. Furthermore, even Ryan Matthews' friend, Travis Hayes, eventually confessed to the crime of driving Matthews away from the crime scene (Ryan Matthews n.d). Although, the fact is worth mentioning that Hayes, and Mathews as well, suffered from some sort of learning disability, so Hayes' confession may have not been by his own volition (University of Michigan Law School 2023). However, Matthews maintained …show more content…

Eventually, his friend was proven innocent in the month of December 2006 and was exonerated in the month of January 2007 (Ryan Matthews n.d). Cases like this are often common where innocent people are convicted of crimes that they did not commit. The reason for this is due to the courts over reliance on eyewitness testimonies, despite the fact that they tend to be unreliable. According to Albright (2017), “memory is malleable.” People often fail to remember various situations correctly because of what they do or do not perceive. Individuals can often mistake objects or others for something else. Moreover, crimes are committed without notice, so people may remember them incorrectly due to the sudden nature of said offense. Additionally, the conditions of the environment can have a massive effect on a person's perception of a situation (Albright 2017). For instance, in Matthews' case the witness, “Cheramie identified Johnson, [Ryan Matthews], as the gunman,” even though DNA evidence proves he was not the person that shot Vanhoose (University of Michigan Law School

Show More
Related
281 Words | 2 Pages

At the age of 17, Ryan Matthews was sentenced to death for the murder of convenience store owner, Tommy Vanhoose. Police failed to investigate on all evidence to convict the real killer, Rondell Love. Love shot Mr. Vanhoose four times and fled, taking off his mask and diving into the passenger side window of the getaway car. Hours after the crime, Ryan Watthews and associate, Travis Hayes (also 17) were stopped because the car they were driving in resembled the killers. A witness claimed that Ryan took part of the crime, others said he was too tall to be the suspect.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

This finding proved that while Jennifer swore it was Ronald based on his appearance, it is not. Additionally, there is the fact that there was suspect bias represented in Jennifer choosing Ronald and continuing to believe that it was Ronald behind the crime even when evidence proved otherwise. So, eliminating as much suspect bias would have made an exponential difference in identifying the correct person. There are issues with relying on eyewitness testimonies, especially when it comes to a traumatic event such as sexual violence. Specifically stated by Smith and Hattery (2011) is that almost all wrongful convictions from other studies were resulting from the lack of reliability with eyewitness testimonies.

Read More
2380 Words | 10 Pages

During the fall of 1993, Shirley Crook’s, a loving mother and wife, life was horribly cut short in one of the most horrific ways possible, drowning. Seventeen year old, Christopher Simmons, wrapped his victim in duct tape and electrical cords and drowned her in a river with help from his accomplices John Tessmer and Christopher Benjamin. He attempted to burglarize the Crooks residence along with his accomplices, and he only murdered Mrs. Crooks because ‘the bitch seen my face’ (State v. Simmons). He “assured his friends that their status as juveniles would allow them to ‘get away with it.’... Brian Moomey, a 29-year-old convicted felon who allowed neighborhood teens to "hang out" at his home.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

This week’s topic was very interesting to learn about how important eyewitnesses can be when a crime and accidents do occur. In the case that was presented in the 60-minute segment of Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson is exactly how legal system can fail us when it comes to the eyewitnesses’ identification testimony and how a person’s perception and memory can be altered. The aspect of psychology and law research from this week’s course material is most relevant to the topic of perception and memory. The memory has different stages the first is encoding the process of entering perception into memory.

Read More
161 Words | 1 Pages

In 2004, 19-year-old Ryan Ferguson spent his days locked in a Missouri jail doing curls with a five-gallon coffee jug until he couldn’t feel his arms. The scrawny, basketball-obsessed teenager had been charged in the murder of Columbia Tribune sports columnist Ken Heitholt, based almost entirely on the testimony of Ferguson’s former friend who had dreamed that the pair were somehow involved. Ferguson was convicted despite no physical evidence against him and sentenced to forty years in maximum-security prison. For almost a decade he and his family fought for his innocence, until 2013 when his conviction was finally vacated.

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

Justice Helen Wood described the event as “chillingly dangerous,” (Burgess, 2016) and also stated that the teenager was apologetic about his actions. It has been suggested that the teenager’s attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and his intellectual disability may have an effect on his decision making and thus, led to his rash driving and manslaughter. However, it was revealed through psychiatric assessment that he was intellectually capable of recognising the severe nature and consequence of his crime and concluded to be completely accountable for the crime he committed. The boy’s identity was hidden for legal reasons and thus, details about the teenager excluding his age and intellectual disability were not revealed. This provided limitations within the article in addressing the factors that could have resulted in his actions.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

17 year old Christopher Simmons along with another friend robbed, kidnapped, and murdered a woman by throwing her off of a bridge with her hands and legs bound. Simmons and his friend were caught shortly after the heinous act, primarily due to Simmons bragging about what he did. When arrested by the local police, he was taken to the police station and was given his Miranda rights. Simmons “waived his right to an attorney and agreed to answer questions” (Cornell University, n.d.). Simmons confessed to the murder and gave a videotaped reenactment of how he committed the heinous act.

Read More
1194 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout his sentence Ruiz continued to assert his innocence, interesting the Innocence Project. After taking on his case, the Innocence Project used the DNA originally found at the crime to clear him of his convictions. In court cases, such as Mr. Ruiz’s eyewitness testimonies, tend to be seen as the most credible and therefore persuasive form of evidence. However, human memory is fallible and recollection is often inaccurate. Due to the unreliability of human memory, many innocent people like Mr.Ruiz are convicted every year and sentenced to prison for crimes they did not commit.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

Once a young innocent boy, Joe Sullivan, a thirteen year old boy who suffered from mental disabilities from ignorance and abuse from father, became obligated by two older boys to participate in the robbery of an elderly homeowner. The day of the burglary, the homeowner was also mercilessly sexually assaulted. Whilst Sullivan admitted to being the boy’s accomplice, he adamantly denied the sexual assault. Though denying the charges and lack of evidence, Joe Sullivan was convicted as an adult and sentenced to life without parole. Sullivan’s forsaken teenage years behind bars lead him to become an underdeveloped man stuck in the past.

Read More
1237 Words | 5 Pages

After 28 years behind bars for a murder he did not commit, Lamar Johnson is now an exonerated man. In 1995, Johnson was charged with first-degree murder for the shooting of his friend, Markus Boyd. Over his two-day trial, the guilty verdict was determined by one key factor, a lone eyewitness; looking beyond inconsistencies within the case and taking word of mouth over investigative evidence, the jury’s ruling was decided in less than two hours. At just 21 years old, Johnson was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, leaving behind his girlfriend and two young daughters (Moriarty, 2024). Beginning the day of his incarceration, Johnson began to build a new case to reclaim his innocence, in a sense becoming his own lawyer

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

The narrative begins in 1993 with the sickening murder of Shirley Crook by seventeen-year-old Christopher Simmons. The Missourian had plotted to, “… commit burglary and murder by breaking and entering, tying up the victim, and throwing that victim off a bridge” (543 US 551, at 556-57). When the disfigured body of Mrs. Crook was located, authorities arrested Simmons who quickly confessed to the killing and was sent to court to be tried as an adult. During the trial, both the prosecutor and defense applied Simmons’ age as a justification for their arguments. The defense stated that Simmons’ age was a mitigating factor, citing several legal limitations on the capabilities of minors and in opposition, the prosecutor argued that it was actually

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Being convicted is never the best thing in the world, but if you're innocent, you are perfectly fine, there’s no way anyone would accuse you of something, right? Well that isn’t the case here, some innocents are accused of crimes they had no part of, and later have been ‘proved’ guilty in court, but where not guilty of the crime. They are usually acquitted later on, like Kirk Bloodsworth. He was accused of the rape, and murder of a 9-year old girl, and later his innocence was proved by a DNA test.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

Take the case of the case made against the female police officer, the explanation is that most police officers become seen as professionals who are always ready and able because they are mostly needed to ready at all times in case of danger or a certain event. Take the second case of Dr. Grigson who uses the confirmation bias that all people who he is convicting are guilty psychopaths and will commit murder continuously if they aren’t stopped by the police force. Take the case of the last case where Edith James states that the Texas law doesn’t wish to ruin a young man’s life even if the evidence is pointing toward the person and that they aren’t guilty at all since they are still just kids. These three examples suggest that confirmation bias which is where someone believes something and always has it confirmed is used in this case where a certain person was convicted for a crime that he didn’t

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

Misidentification does occur in adults, only having a glimpse of a suspect or only picking out a few details and choosing the person based on those can result in an innocent person being convicted. Memory is a difficult subject to study, and there are many factors that

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

A 26-year-old Derbyshire man, who has spent more than three years in jail for a rape, is found innocent in the conviction. According to Mail Online, Danny Kay's conviction was quashed after one of his relatives uncovered a series of bombshell Facebook messages, missed by police- which proves his innocence. The newly retrieved Facebook messages reveal Mr. Kay had a consensual sex with his accuser.

Read More

More about Ryan Matthews Case

Open Document