The SAT has become biased towards wealthy families and those who have money readily available. Money determines success in many things in life unfortunately, wealth also has an effect on how well one scores on the SAT. The SAT was designed to indicate which students are able to retain more knowledge while making sure that everyone was on a level playing field. However, this idea of equality for all who take the test has now disappeared. All around the country, people are coming up with tips and tricks on how to score higher on the SAT.
Although the College Board believes the SAT is a good predictor of academic success, this method of testing should be optional for students, as high school GPAs are better reflections on a student’s work ethics and future success in
These tests both determine student’s performance in multiple areas and students are scored on how they do on these tests. Many colleges require a minimum score to be accepted to their school. ACT and SAT scores should not be taken
SATS and ACTS have been used for numerous years as a way to gauge a student’s academic success while in college. Students have the choice which test they would prefer to take and most colleges do not prefer one test over the other. There are a few key differences between the SAT and ACT, which may make one test more suitable than the other for those taking the tests. Many studies have proven that the SAT and ACT are not the best judge of future success, and that colleges should focus their applications more on past grades and accomplishments to decide which students should be accepted to their university. SATs and ACTs are not an effective measure of college readiness and future academic success.
While the argument presents a great benefit for colleges across the united states, the testing scores fail to do justice to students because the scores do not represent the actual skills that the students need to succeed in college. To clarify, the SAT, particularly in the math section, tests students by how quick they can substitute an answer choice for a variable in the problem and not by how the students can critically think about a solution for a question. Therefore, the SAT fails as a proper indicator of skills necessary for success in college. In addition, this disadvantage in sat testing overwhelms the benefits that sat testing
The first attempt and success to climb Mt. Everest occured in 1953. Since then, almost 4,000 people have been able to scale the mountain, but over 230 people have not been able to climb it successfully. There is a chance of accident or death when climbing this mountain or any dangerous activity. All people should should have the right to rescue services even if they knowingly put themselves at risk because there is always a chance of an accident happening, rangers are there to save people in danger, and there are rescue vehicles being produced to be used in case of an emergency.
For years, colleges have used standardized testing to determine admissions and scholarships. Colleges should choose another form of examination for students, because the SAT’s are inaccurate measurement of someone’s intelligence. It is a four to five hour timed test that students could prepare for, for months and still come out with a bad score. Some students are not good test takers and this reflects poorly on them. Admissions and scholarships should not weigh on SAT scores so heavily because they don’t determine how strong of a student you are.
No one enjoys taking the SAT/ACT test, but students hope it will all pay off in the end. There are many things students can do to help themselves prepare for both of these huge tests in order for the results to pay off. Some sources say to get a good nights sleep the night before and eat a good breakfast the morning of. Jeramy Powers, teaches Integrated Chemistry and Physics (ICP), has taken the SAT/ACT test before in his life time and said, “Try to do well in classes and look back at old things to help yourself. Start studying a week before testing.
Standardized tests do not work because of inaccuracy, bias, and student misunderstanding. The ACT and SAT tests are used as college entrance exams all over the US. Most schools require you to take one or both of these tests and get a minimum score in order to be accepted to that school. The SAT and ACT have been proven to be fairly accurate at predicting a student’s average performance for their freshman year in college.
There are around 850 colleges in the United States that are test optional (Sheffer). Meaning you do not have to take the ACT or SAT to apply to these schools, and this trend is slowly growing. So, should the ACT or SAT be required for any college? It should not, as there are many reasons students may not do well on standardized or timed tests. This can cause very intelligent people to be rejected from colleges just because their test scores are not the best, even if their grade point average and history in high school was immaculate.
Are the SAT's that heavily weighted for colleges? The SAT's, the one thing all high school students dread, and we can all agree on that. The SAT becomes an obsession that slowly destroys the motivation to come to school and move on. I've decided on this topic because as a junior I'll be sucked into taking the test and devoting a lot of time into preparing for the test, along with others. And to that are the SAT's effective or needed?
As well, Someone’s SAT score should be another deciding factor in the academic scholarship they receive. If someone does an amazing job on the SAT and has an immaculate GPA, they should be offered more scholarship money than the applicant with a good GPA but not up to snuff SAT scores. Another reason colleges are hesitant in making a change is that they believe it would hurt the colleges appearance. Steven Syverson, another writer into the test optional movement said it best, “If they didn’t ask for the scores, they would be regarded in the marketplace as having very low prestige. High level schools can’t afford that” (syverson).
Even though standardized tests have their flaws, they are an element of the college application process for a reason. The ACT and SAT do offer insight into a student’s abilities and give a general overview of their potential. Such tests should remain part of the college admission process, but should not be placed above elements such as grade point average, leadership positions, and community service.
We say we should never judge a book by its cover, a motto that all colleges should follow since their admission process is solely based on a swing vote of a test score (SAT). The SAT also known as the scholastic aptitude test is the most highly regarded test which thousands of students all across the country will have to take once in their high school lifetime. A determinate factor that Colleges use, to determine if a student is a good fit for their university. But how can colleges determine if a student will excel and be successful from their university based on their SAT scores? This very question has posed many arguments saying that colleges should diminished this test as it plays a big role in college application process and gives those who live in economically comfortable families a greater edge over others who aren’t well off.
Aptitude is defined as readiness and quickness in learning, or, general intelligence. Colleges have attempted to measure aptitude, in order to be more selective in the pool of students that apply, through various means, such as Grade Point Average, or Standardized Tests. The two main tests for aptitude in the United States are the ACT, and the SAT. Although the tests have been used for decades, the SAT in particular has been the subject of heated debate over the validity, reliability, and overall honesty of its ability to measure aptitude. The fact is, the SAT is a fundamentally unfair system, as the test significantly lowers the chances of high-quality students being admitted into a college; in actuality, it rewards basic knowledge of many subjects, rather than an actual understanding of the area of study a student will major in, which, in turn, results in racial and socioeconomic disadvantages, through differential scores and cost of the test.
