ipl-logo

Sara Holbrook 12 Angry Men

808 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of 12 angry men

In “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose and “Democracy” by Sara Holbrook, both authors describe the issues that face our democracy. However, Holbrook’s poem focuses and expresses the thoughts and feelings of one speaker, while Reginald Rose expresses the perspectives of multiple characters. Although they both express the same perspective, they display their ideas in different formats. Holbrook uses a poem and Rose uses a play to get his message across to readers. In the end, both authors gave their point of views, but just in different types of texts.

Rose’s play tells the story of a murder case trial in which the jurors must decide whether the accused is really guilty. The drama uses setting, dialogue, scene directions, and stage …show more content…

For instance, stage directions help to enhance the understanding of the jurors through their actions. For example, “seven or eight hands immediately go up. Several others go up more slowly. Everyone looks around the table as the foreman rises and begins to count hands.” (pg 102 Rose). Through this quote, Rose indicates that some jurors are afraid of giving their own decision and had followed others. However, each opinion does matter, as it can bring up a new aspect or perspective up. Maybe if all of the jurors expressed their opinions, freely there could be a very important turn in the trial. Another technique that Rose used to elaborate his view, is dialogue. Dialogue gives the reader insight and information about the characters. An example of dialogue is, “10TH JUROR: What figures? It’s the people! I’m tellin’ you they let those kids run wild up there. Well, maybe it serves ’ em right. Know what I mean?” (Pg 102 Rose). The …show more content…

However, each of their texts focuses on the issues of two different parts of democracy. Sara Holbrook’s poem describes the faults in the welfare system, while Rose’s play shows the issues in the courtroom. On the contrary side, they both used figurative devices in their texts. Although they have some differences and similarities, in the end, both authors demonstrated the same point of

Show More
Related

Anna Howard Shaw's Speech

420 Words | 2 Pages

Anna Howard Shaw uses a serious and persuasive tone in her speech to present her central idea that all citizens; men and women alike, should have the right to vote. Shaw believes that it is not fair to say that New York is a republic and not follow through with it completely. In the text Shaw says, “Now one of two things is true: either a Republic is a desirable form of government, or else it is not. If it is, then we should have it, if it is not then we ought not to pretend that we have it.” This statements shows that Shaw I very serious about the rights that a republican should have.

Read More

Similarities Between 12 Angry Men And The Crucible

1695 Words | 7 Pages

The Crucible and 12 Angry Men are two plays with the same theme of justice that is expressed differently throughout each play. From their differing time periods and setting, both plays explore the justice system within society and the role people play within the system. Both 12 Angry Men and The Crucible have similarities, both plays have main characters that are attempting to right wrongs that they see being committed in their respected plays. Once the authors introduced the characters to us they then showed us how they implement the justice system in their plays and the effect it had on the plays societies. The outcome of these stories are different and they express varying effects the justice system can have on society.

Read More

Similarity Between 12 Angry Men And Trifles

170 Words | 1 Pages

There is a similarity between the play of Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and Trifles regarding the idea of investigating the evidences. Eleven men who are sure the murder is guilty have made up their minds before they have even considered that the killer might be innocent. But, Juror eight gets them to review the evidence more carefully. As a group, the judges developed visions that even most jurors changed their views when the validity of the evidence was shown to be a questionable. There is a similarity between the play of Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and Trifles regarding the idea of investigating the evidences.

Read More

Character Analysis Of Juror 8 In 'The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street'

652 Words | 3 Pages

and they start to gang up and say “he sat in there for 6 days and he doesn't know” and “You sat right in court and heard the same things I did” (Rose 14). This evidence shows that just because he has his own opinion and doesn’t want to vote guilty because everyone else did, people aren’t respecting his opinion and are basically calling him stupid for his decision. And I feel like more people started to choose innocent because they took into consideration of his idea and realized they could stand up to the rest of the group since they had

Read More

Testimonies In The Play '12 Angry Men' By Reginald Rose

492 Words | 2 Pages

There are a few examples of this in the play which will be taken further in depth later on. The examples are the testimonies given against the defendant in the play.     One of the testimonies given was that an old man woke up and heard someone shout I'm going to kill you a loud thump then the boy run out of the building. Throughout the story the jurors talk more in depth about the old man’s story and find it to be

Read More

Comparing Views In 'Democracy And Twelve Angry Men'

430 Words | 2 Pages

In Reginald Rose’s drama, Twelve Angry Men, Rose conveys his perspective on democracy by showing how every vote counts. Reginald Rose uses speaker tags when the 4th juror says, “I think it's customary to take a preliminary vote.” (Rose 101). This shows the basics on making decisions leading onto how the jurors decide. Rose also

Read More

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More

Manliness In One Flew Over The Cuckoo's '

476 Words | 2 Pages

During the 1950s masculine values of aggression and stereotypical manliness were passed down through the generations due to the hardships war veterans faced; however, initially, these values seem to be imprinted on the opinions and beliefs of most jurors. Nevertheless, as the play progresses it becomes clear that Rose, using powerful adverbs, wants to illustrate masculinity as very weak and divided, and that the manliness and aggression is only a front for the American men to hide their weaknesses. Furthermore, on page 9 juror no.3, despite being supposedly the most stubborn, "humourless" and "forceful" juror of them all; reveals a show of emotion and weakness despite his front of stereotypical manliness: after talking about his son (who had left him) he, "[Looks away embarrassed]". The use of the adverb "away" illustrates his embarrassment because he is unable to look at the rest of the jurors confidently, furthermore, this shows his weaknesses - his estranged son, and how he tries to hide his emotion, by looking away.

Read More

Hilly Holbrook In The Help

589 Words | 3 Pages

In the novel, The Help, by Kathryn Stockett, there are many characters that can be identified as an antagonist throughout the story. However, Hilly Holbrook is the most significant of them all. With her attitude towards colored people, her controlling personality, and the methods she uses in order to have her way, it is obvious that Ms. Hilly is a definite villain of this novel. In the novel, many white families, including Ms. Hilly’s, had hired African American maids to help them around the house.

Read More

Perceiving Evidence In Susan Glaspell's Trifles

796 Words | 4 Pages

In Susan Glaspell's play “Trifles,” there is a difference between the men and women’s way of perceiving evidence to Mr. Wright’s murder case. The men spend most of their time searching for solid evidence upstairs where Mr. Wright's murder takes place. However, the women spend most of their time in Mrs. Wright’s kitchen. Instead of seeking tangible evidence, they inspect the condition of the items and acknowledge how they have been muddled around. Different perspectives lead to a variety of discoveries such as the women’s way of perceiving evidence.

Read More

The Crucible Value

239 Words | 1 Pages

These accounts caused other people to be accused of such a event, which led to the higher courts taking action on the evidence and prosecutions. Several important figures were taken of their lives by the rope. Throughout this play a certain value was promptly expressed by many characters. A value is something of worth to a person, and it is by one’s judgment

Read More

Jury Narrative

1201 Words | 5 Pages

“Please stand.” Once the Jury were at their seats: “You may sit. The Jury and I have made our decision, Miss Scarlett Rose. You have admitted to murdering your parents is that right?” “Yes your honour but, but…” “Silence!

Read More

12 Angry Men Analysis

814 Words | 4 Pages

With selfish attitudes like this, it was unlikely that Juror 10 would be interested in the truth behind the evidence and the case itself. Hence, his racial prejudice was important in determining his vote. He believes the boy is guilty, not because the facts point to it, but because of the boy’s ethnicity. It is clear that Rose has constructed Juror 10 as a means of identifying that prejudice,

Read More

Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men

1011 Words | 5 Pages

(Rose), he knows what the jurors are there to do and he doesn’t want time being wasted on petty disputes. The Physical Education Teacher also remained unbiased and never took one juror's side over another’s, even if he completely agreed with one of them. He could have abused the fact that he was the Foreman and used that to persuade others to listen to what he had to say or used it to change other jury members vote to guilty; however, he never did that. The Physical Education Teacher was the best juror because he showed that he has respect for the other jury members by listening to what they had to say and by being unbiased towards the opinions that were different than

Read More

Guilt In Joseph Kafka's The Trial

1230 Words | 5 Pages

The Trial, published in 1925, after Kafka’s death in 1924, depicts the internalized conflict Joseph K faces in a society flawed by its abusive power in the law system. The oppressive and mysterious trial wins the reader’s attention in trying to figure out, at the same time as K himself, what the latter is accused of. On the morning of his 30th birthday, Joseph K disregards his accusation as he presumes to be innocent. However, as the protagonist evolves throughout the novel, his conviction of an unavoidable execution leads him to fame his “shame.” Joseph K is a developing character.

Read More

More about Sara Holbrook 12 Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document