The use of symbolism is often used by authors to show a deeper meaning to an object within a story. These enhancements to the meaning of objects gives readers insight to what is really being represented. Although they may seem vague, they create a path to better understanding of characters and scenarios within a story. A proper use of this technique can be witnessed in Lord of the Flies. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, symbolism is used to depict a greater meaning within the objects that appear throughout the novel. One of the recurring symbols is the scar created in the story. The scar is created when the plane that the boys were in crashed onto the island. This was meant to represent man destroying nature simply by entering it. “Beyond falls and cliffs there was a gash visible in the trees; there were the splintered trunks and then the drag, leaving only a fringe of palm between the scar and the sea” (page 29). This passage from the novel describes the remnants of the crash and what could be seen. When the plane crashed it left a scarce amount of what was previously there. The plane is created by man and destroys the nature that it tore through. This creates a deeper understanding to what the novel is depicting. Similarly, …show more content…
The Lord of the Flies, or “The Beast”, symbolized the evil that lies dormant within each person. “‘You knew didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close, close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are what they are?’” (page 143). This passage is when the Lord of the Flies is speaking with Simon. It says how it is part of them and that is why things are the way they are. They believed the Beast was something that they could hunt down, but it was the dark side that lied within each of them. With that symbolizing the monster in each of them, it shows that it is not something that they can control and will likely submit