1924, a man by the name of Erich von Stroheim endeavors film adaptation of Frank Norris’s novel, McTeague spawning 10 hours of Greed, a moving picture. It was cut, thanks to studio direction to 4 hours, and soon 2, but still failing because of the missing material after the abridge. After, only daring producers made any effort to make book reports a hell of alot easier. Once Hollywood comes into play, films take away the important pieces to the story, and maybe it’s just the kooky Californians, but they’re always in a hurry to get to the action. So tell me, when can I watch a movie first, and finally read the book last? In times of desperation, a trusty librarian pointed to the last book on the shelf, Seabiscuit. Compact with 400 pages, it tells of an American legend standing 5’ 2” and 130 pounds, a horse with no background, a man that lost everything, a trainer who loses hope, and a young fella who's losing a right path.
Seabiscuit is a good interpretation of the movie as it was successful in showing not the detail of unneeded information, but the bulk of true, unedited, classical knowledge to realize the impact of 3 lives and a horse on the United States.
Based on a true story, Seabiscuit is empowered by the people that create the monumental horse, and the movie represents the
…show more content…
Within the thick cover, multiple settings are described by the abundance of main characters and places taken for races. California mountains are tamed by California mountains and not the Arizona desert. Taking an image inside a reader's mind is just about impossible to any movie director. However, in Seabiscuit, the picture is clear and concise to what the reader sees. Any movie can be created, from a book storyline, it becomes least likely to deliver, but only one will give you the sensation that you're in the