ipl-logo

Section 10 Of The Constitution: Innate Dignity

212 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Hate speech and the first amendment

The Constitution
Section 10 of the Constitution asserts the innate dignity of and guarantees that this dignity will be both safeguarded and valued.
Section 16(1) of the Constitution bestows of all the entitlement of freedom of expression. The Constitution, established on the values of human dignity, equality and freedom, omits specific expressions from constitutional protection because of prospective assault on the dignity of others. Section 16(2)(c) of the Constitution, the hate speech provision, withholds constitutional protection for expressions which propagate abhorrence on racial grounds that provokes injury. An expression both promote animosity and encourage injury to constitute hate speech. Importantly, the Constitution allows all expression, rather denying protection to the expressions assigned to section 16(2) of the Constitution. …show more content…

Hate speech is proscribed to circumvent the public order disintegrating into anarchy because of revenge sought by victims thereof, to stop mental and emotional injury to victimized groups which would impede their competence in partaking in community life, to avoid and marginalization of minority factions repudiating similar prospects and advantages and their imperceptible disregard as equal citizens and preclude socio-politico breakdown. Parliament may promulgate statues proscribing expressions exempt from constitutional

Show More
Related
1148 Words | 5 Pages

The suppression of hate propaganda signifies an infringement of individual’s freedom of expression. An activity that conveys a message through non-violent forms of expression is protected under the s.2 of the Charter regardless of how offensive it is. Moreover, there was a misapplication of Charter, which made s.319 (2) of the Criminal Code to fail the proportionality test. There was no relation between the criminalization of hate speech and its suppression. Although his comments were offensive, they did not pose any threats they way violence or violence threats would have.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

In this article, Jacobs successfully makes his argument by remaining objective, appealing more toward the ethos and logos of the reader, and limiting emotional language. Jacobs aims his article toward lawmakers and voters. Motives are subjective and based on many factors; therefore, Jacobs argues that basing hate crime off of motive does not only create hardships but also flaws. He continues his argument by looking at rights given to the people from the First Amendment. According to the First Amendment, people possess many freedoms including the freedom of speech; however, Jacobs argues how hate crimes

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

This act was established by the federal law within the US and passed in October 2009 by the Congress (Altschiller, 2015). It protects individuals from hate crimes that may be directed to them by other individuals. As a result of their differences in gender, ethnicity, and origin. This act gives the justice system of the US the authority to punish those who engage in hate crimes that are motivated by their victim’s race, religion and ethnicity among others. Moreover, for a victim the hate crime to be protected by this act, he or she does not

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

This concept is also true with the symbolic speech clause and commercial speech clause. The government will protect the right to speech to advertisements and the citizens to a certain degree. Slander, libel, Defamation of character, hate speeches, and actual malice will not be tolerated. These include degrading someone as a person, their race, or religion. As soon as the public’s safety is a risk, the Clear and Present Test takes effect.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

First Amendment rights are guaranteed to all American citizens, but current free speech issues are testing Constitutional boundaries. Where must the line be drawn between free speech and infringement upon others’ rights? Is there some speech so cruel and so appalling that it does not merit protection? These issues have been raised by the recent activities of the Westboro Baptist Church. Based out of Topeka, Kansas[1], this small group of radicals is marked by their hateful views and their contempt for homosexuality. The Westboro Baptist Church has gained notoriety and sparked national outrage with their offensive acts, particularly by protesting the funerals of fallen soldiers.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Hate speech is defined as: speech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. While the United States has the bill of rights and the freedom of expression/speech some states do have speech provisions such as California. There are laws that label speech as ‘limited classes’ which could cause one to be sued in a court of law and that would include: lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or “fighting” words – those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. All other speech is protected under your first amendment rights. Refer to a legal expert when in

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Hate speech includes, but is not limited to, gesture, conduct, writing, or verbal communication that might encourage discriminatory behavior to a protected individual or group of individuals. Many universities are committed to creating an atmosphere of equal opportunity that harbors talent, creativity and ingenuity. Speech codes are not only justifiable, but are also essential to campuses because they do not allow the use of hate speech. One who is for the use of speech codes on campuses may argue alongside Lawrence in saying that it is unacceptable to use hate speech in any scenario or environment because it suppresses the voices of minorities. Lawrence presents the idea that “the subordinate victims of fighting words are silenced by their relatively powerless position in society.”

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

People say things that others don’t agree with, or they say things that are disrespectful,but that doesn’t mean there’s a law against it, because everyone has a write to speech. ‘’Or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. ’’ What this is trying to say is that you can say anything to anyone you want even if their powerful. But you can get in trouble if you say something threatening.

Read More
379 Words | 2 Pages

Relationships help us through tough situations. In the film, Bridge to Terabithia, we are presented with many recurring issues, for example, Jesse Aarons’s bullies, Mr Aarons and Jesse’s relationship and most importantly, empathy and understanding between one another. The characters face many problems in which they rely on others for help. With these strong bonds, the protagonist, Jesse, is able to overcome these difficulties. After Leslie’s death, Jesse doesn't accept her death and is in denial.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Hate speech against minority is discrimination which has no place in our society. Constitution is color blind. Skin color does not make any difference; it is racism which lies in the eyes of beholder. Hate speech suppress the voice of minority so that they are unable to exchange the ideas

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

The First amendment to the US Constitution is known as the bill of rights. The bill of rights is a broad generalization of the freedoms guaranteed to US citizens, these rights include; freedom of speech, freedom or religion, right to bear arms and many more. The Texas Constitution also list outs these rights, except go into much more detail (Maxwell, Crain, & Jones, 2014). For example, in the US constitution, it states that we have the freedom to practice any religion we choose.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

The time in which we live is the age of communication and the speech or talking one of the important ways of communication and expression. There are different types of Speech and communicate, one of them hate speech. Hate speech means attacking a person or group based on different basis such as gander, religion, race, ethnic origin or nationality and disability. In the other hand, some of human rights treaties agree with freedom of speech or freedom of expression it could offend or disturb others so government of Countries placed laws of hate speech to avoid harms, troubles and problems. Over years Hate speech law became one of the most known laws in international law.

Read More

More about Section 10 Of The Constitution: Innate Dignity

Related Topics

Open Document