During episode 4 of the Serial podcast series, a production of WBEZ Chicago, Sarah Koenig, the narrator of the podcast series, brings up the fact that there are major inconsistencies in testimonies pertaining to the murder of Hae Min Lee. Big inconsistencies in testimonies made from accomplices, witnesses, peers, loved ones, etcetera, are detrimental to the legitimacy of any trial, but more specifically a homicide case. In testimonies made by Jenn Pusateri and Jay the severity of their involvement, according to their own stories goes back and forth from witness and accomplice to the murder of Hae. This bamboozles those following the Serial podcast and seemingly dumbfounds the investigators of the case and even Sarah Koenig herself. This makes it difficult to place accusations on any suspect without reasonable doubt. …show more content…
When Jenn was first confronted by the police she reports that she knows nothing from the night while having no involvement in the homicide. However, the second interview explained that Jenn encountered Jay the night of Hae’s death. Jenn also recalls that Jay told her that he said Adnan Syed told him that he killed Hae, and Jay said he seen Hae’s body in the trunk of Adnan’s car at Best Buy. Detectives then ask Jenn if Jay and Adnan are friends she responds by saying that they were more like casual acquaintances. This has detectives wondering why Adnan would involve Jay at all if the two are not