ipl-logo

Critical Analysis Of Oleanna

917 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Anita hill and clarence thomas scandal essays

One of the most controversial plays of the 1990s, Oleanna induced aggressive debates about sexual harassment and gender politics. This play, written during the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas sexual harassment misconduct is about a female student accusing her male professor of sexual offense. Oleanna, an influential two-character dramatization by David Mamet, investigates the danger of miscommunication and extreme political rightness. It is a play about scholastic governmental issues, educator connections, and lewd behavior. The beauty of this play lies within the fact that neither the professor nor Carol is right. Ultimately, both characters are deeply flawed. Throughout the play they scarcely agree or understand each other resulting in the most …show more content…

The entire conversation that follows is accounted for their failure of communication. Constant miscommunication between the two has lead Carol to make fabricated sexual harassment charges on John. Furthermore, John, an intelligent and meticulous man, is given an offstage life that he may lose if found guilty of sexually harassing Carol. Carol knows all about his family background and with the help of this information, she can churn the information around according to her likes and make John the guilty one. This is interpreted in a way in which Carol is a crazy desperate student who finds minute gestures to be sexual and intimidating and ultimately seeking power over men by fabricating sexual harassment charges on …show more content…

John initially sympathizes for Carol and offers his help to Carol to understand the lessons thought in class. However after some time nearing the end of Act 1, he states that if Carol wants to attain an A grade in his class, she has to have frequent personal meetings in his office. This can be looked upon as a situation where John, being a husband also has the intention of doing ethically wrong to his student. Carol on the other hand has all the right to defend herself from any sexual proceedings and can therefore charge John guilty of sexual harassment. Carol, being the subordinate amongst the two listens patiently to the conversation between John and the tenure committee. This act had caused frustration in Carol as she couldn’t achieve what she had initially planned to do to comprehend the lessons taught. The frustration that she displayed towards John had eventually turned back on her in a way that is incorrect especially towards women. So this can also be viewed as a situation where Carol is just protecting herself from possible danger.

In this play the relationship between a masculine professor and his feminine student imitates gender roles in patriarchy, in fact, reiterates the power difference essentials in those roles.
The play can also be seen as an attack against Political Correctness or it can be seen as an

Show More
Related
637 Words | 3 Pages

The adults in Salem, Oregon in Stephen Karam’s Speech & Debate had good reason to treat the teens as if they were children. If Diwata, Solomon, and Howie were an accurate representation of the other students at the school, it is no wonder that the parents, teachers, and school board sought to exercise an abundance of control and provide too much guidance in their lives. The three teens dealt with “grown-up” issues throughout the play, but they tried to tackle them in characteristically childish ways. In the opening scene of the play, viewers are introduced to Howie, an openly gay 18-year-old.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

John had an affair with Abigail when Elizabeth was sick, which made Abigail crazy for him. John forces Abigail to began accusing innocent people so that she would be able to finally accuse Elizabeth. When Proctor finds himself on trial, he reveals to the court that he knows Abigail. This was a very bad decision because now the court will find it hard to believe him. Proctor tries to tell the judges that Abigail wants to replace his wife.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

In comparison to the movie, the play undermines male dominance by focusing on women’s efforts to solve their own problems. First of all, there aren’t even men in the cast of the play,

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

Overtime, the patriarchal system has been challenged and the defined gender roles are in the process of being eradicated. By presenting the plays protagonist Loureen, as an abuse victim that finds her voice and stands up against her battery, Lynn brilliantly illustrates that

Read More
1410 Words | 6 Pages

Priestly depicts gender stereotypes to emphasise gender in a capitalistic, misogynistic and patriarchal society, in his play 'An Inspector Calls'. Priestly portrays women as emotional, commodified, materialistic and irresponsible to highlight the way that a misogynistic capitalist society operates. In a similar manner, Priestly presents men as arrogant, ambitious, dominant, and strong. By doing this Priestly aims to critique capitalism and the underlying implications and undercurrent of problems which capitalism brings to provoke a reaction in the audience to promote socialism. Priestly presents women as weak, emotional and irresponsible throughout the entire play by using Sheila to show the 'pink and intimate' safety bubble and facade which her family lives in.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

John has everything that a person could ever wish for: a job, loving family and friends, but he still abandons it all. When John confesses to his wife about the affair, she fires Abigail. Several months later, when Abby approaches him about it, he tells her that what they had is

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

When they got home from the Court John walks over to Mary, the stage direction states, “Grasping her by the throat as though he would strangle her” (Miller 1129). Since she never told the court what actually had happen john went with what he said and start to beat mary for not telling the truth. He did warn Mary that he would strangle her but, he is not allowed to threaten her to tell something and beat for not telling her and that makes him a flawed man.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

John is Jane’s husband who is trying to control every aspect of Jane’s life. Jane states, “There comes John, and I must put this away-he hates to have me write a word.” (Gilman) This is just one of numerous situations and statements that the narrator shares with the audience. John’s influence also plays a big part in his dysfunctional marriage with Jane.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

Carol continuously goes back to meet with John alone in his office even after she filed the accusations against him. If a woman has been sexually harassed or especially “raped” you would not think that she would continue to put herself in the situation that she was in when it first occurred. It is as if Carol persistently goes back to meet with John alone in order to collect more “evidence” that she can contort to match her accusation of rape or even to go as far as pushing him to actually commit the crime that he is being accused of. Throughout the play, Carol seemed to almost want John to actually sexually assault or even go as far as rape her like in her accusations. In Act 3, Carol takes provoking John to a new level when she overhears a phone call he has with his wife and then tells him “Don’t call your wife baby” (Mamet 54).

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

Much of the preservations in the play are for men who have even denied the women their privacy. Susan Glaspell shows women as weak and only able to do weak responsibilities such as housekeeping and staying at their

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

However, while they both have the same intentions, their actions conflict heavily, and situate them on opposite sides of a matter. Because of this, there is not a clear good or evil person; almost every aspect of the playwright is up to the reader’s interpretation. But, it is not impossible to make a compromise between two people about their values, even if it seems the values could not be more

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

The characters in the play reveal some of the gender stereotypes through the way they are presented in the beginning of the play, “The sheriff and Hale are men in the middle life… They are followed

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

He then rips the paper, changing his mind about confessing to a false accusation. This angers everyone else, but John doesn’t care. He knows what is right and tries his best to do

Read More
1457 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout the play, the characters look at faith, race, opportunities, fatherhood and

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

John fires back immediately telling Abby not to say a word about Elizabeth. Although John reassures her many times that he’s not with Abby anymore, she still worries that he’s having an affair because of the way Abby blushes around him at church. In the beginning of Act Two we witness a conversation between the Proctors which is an awkward conversation, where they share a kiss that has a “certain disappointment”

Read More

More about Critical Analysis Of Oleanna

Related Topics

Open Document