Each year around the world, collegiate student-athletes participate in different sports and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. A lot of people have posed the question, should college athletes be paid? The answer to the question is that they should not get paid. The NCAA gives the student-athletes a lot of handouts that includes full-rides to any college of their choice which includes the meal plans, housing, books, and so on. If they were paid to play then they would feel as if they are professional athletes in which they are just athletes playing at the college level. There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first and then they are members of their club. In the name student-athletes, student comes before athlete …show more content…
This would only cause more problems in sports, and there is already enough drama surrounding money in sports, and college would be no different. Even if the NCAA were to place a cap on how much schools could pay the athletes, schools, coaches and recruiters would still find a way to stir up controversy over how much they are getting. Allowing student-athletes to be paid to play opens many doors to corruption and controversy. Boosters and alumni would be given free range on giving players extra ‘bonuses’ for their game