ipl-logo

Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

1829 Words8 Pages

Each year around the world, collegiate student-athletes participate in different sports and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. A lot of people have posed the question, should college athletes be paid? The answer to the question is that they should not get paid. The NCAA gives the student-athletes a lot of handouts that includes full-rides to any college of their choice which includes the meal plans, housing, books, and so on. If they were paid to play then they would feel as if they are professional athletes in which they are just athletes playing at the college level. There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first and then they are members of their club. In the name student-athletes, student comes before athlete …show more content…

This would only cause more problems in sports, and there is already enough drama surrounding money in sports, and college would be no different. Even if the NCAA were to place a cap on how much schools could pay the athletes, schools, coaches and recruiters would still find a way to stir up controversy over how much they are getting. Allowing student-athletes to be paid to play opens many doors to corruption and controversy. Boosters and alumni would be given free range on giving players extra ‘bonuses’ for their game

Show More
Related
2151 Words | 9 Pages

Since the beginning of NCAA athletes have poured their blood, sweat and tears into the sport they are passionate about. Its always about the love of the game, who out works the other and many of sacrifices to be a student athlete at the collegiate level. When athletes reach their goal to enter in the collegiate level it becomes more like a business, and their job is win games and championships which ultimately brings profits to these universities. Over the years people including the athletes have debated upon the issue on whether college athletes should be paid. Some people argue that athletes should get paid because they don’t have time to work or find a job.

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

Even though full scholarships don’t pay for everything, the athletes can still get loans which would cover the cost of their other

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

These students are there to get their education not to be paid like professionals. Nevertheless, people over the years do not get that the athletes intentionally are paid to go to college. The students need to focus

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

NCAA athletes should receive compensation because they spend countless hours practicing and completing school work, universities are making more money than ever, and athletes literally place their bodies on the line. First of all, NCAA athletes should be paid because of the work they put into their sport and studies. Athletes not only spend hours practicing and weight lifting, but they are also expected to go to class and perform well in their studies. Free time is seldom found for collegiate athletes, and hard work is a definite must. If athletes have any extra time, a good percentage of them probably

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

College sports is a huge industry and makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year. The revenue is insane and the people bringing in all the money aren't even being payed. The athletes performing is what is bringing in all of the money, some say that the scholarship that most of the best players in the country have is good compensation but others think not. I believe college athletes should be paid because of all the time and effort the athletes put in. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) makes about 900 million dollars just from the NCAA tournament more formally known as “March Madness”.

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

Some highly recruited athletes throughout the nation feel that they have performed well enough that they should be allowed pay for their play. If athletes have the gift to draw an entire crowd into a stadium just to watch them play, then I don’t see why the NCAA shouldn’t reward these players or even these teams. “U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilkens ruled in favor of ‘effectively fixing the price student athletes could command from the most desirable schools”

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Paying college athletes has always been a debatable topic for more than a handful of years. College athletes practice upwards of 40 hours a week which is a full work week for most people. If colleges start to pay student athletes then they will become more competitive and they’ll play better. College athletes will leave school with something more than a degree sometimes in this economy you'll need more than a degree.

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes should not get paid because these athletes could get caught up in too many issues, like being more important than any other player. Lonzo Ball brought this topic back into the light earlier this year, when he revealed to many news sources that he wasn’t paid as a high ranking college athlete at UCLA. Paying these athletes would cause more problems than this world needs. For example, like many professional athletes, these student athletes could gain the idea of only playing for the money once they get used to the lifestyle. It would effect the game/ sport and nature of it as whole if these student athletes were to be paid.

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

College athletes should also be paid because they don’t have a source of income. They spend most of their time practicing for their sport, and studying for school, so they do not have time for a job to earn money. Athletes work more than most students. D1 football players spend 43 hours a week practicing. The athletes get little to no money.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

As seen, it would be better if college student athletes were paid because it would grant them a way out of debt and a better lifestyle to

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

A topic that is debatable ubiquitously across the country is whether college athletes should be paid or not. Is it fair that college athletes must win championships, be held accountable for their academics, attend practice regularly, and continue to maintain a set grade point average without being paid? Yes, being an athlete and a student is a difficult task. Athletes are expected to hold a high reputation and for themselves and the college. In any case, college athletes should be given benefits but not salaries.

Read More
1379 Words | 6 Pages

People have to understand that a better word to refer to these people than “student athletes” is “athlete students” because their first priority is obviously sports, as stated by Joe Nocera on page 23 of the Junior Scholastic company’s article on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Colleges even go to the extent of forcing these students to pick classes that do not interfere with their sport. College sports make billions of dollars and pay nothing to the main workforce. These both are also facts mentioned by Nocera. It also seems very unfair that everyone in the industry, from janitors to coaches, get paid, but the college athletes themselves do not get paid.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Compensation for college athletes has always been a controversial topic on the minds of athletes. Even though many may say it is not right for college athletes to be paid, I think that is is fair for them to earn some money. The federal government should pay college athletes because of the amount of work they put in, the money they make for the NCAA, and the money that other team members make in comparison. College athletes devote more than 40 hours a week into practice. This means that they use about 24% of their week only on practice not including games and events.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

It is only fair that the players get paid, given how much money college campuses generate annually. Student athletes will put in more effort while also having something to look towards if they receive a portion of what they donate to college sports organizations. One would work harder at a job that's getting paid for than a job that you get paid nothing for. Also, if the students are working all day they are not going to have time for a job and have to be focused on their sport and if they were being paid all those problems would fade away. The fact that college athletes take enormous risks and put their bodies on the line is my final justification for paying them.

Read More
1281 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes spend hours a week practicing for their games; some people think the athletes should be paid, but they do not. College athletes practice and play their sport for at least two or three months; some sport seasons go even longer and the athletes aren’t paid for it. The NCAA (National College Athletic Association) makes millions a year so people think that the players should get a little of it. The athletes do it in hopes to go to the pros one day but if they do not it would be nice to have that money from playing in college. College athletes should be paid because they bring in large amounts of money for the NCAA, they put their future careers on the line every time they play, and it helps start financial awareness.

Read More

More about Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Open Document