ipl-logo

Should Police Acquire Paid Informant?

494 Words2 Pages

The local police received a tip from an informant that a supply store was allegedly growing and selling marijuana. The enforcement needed proof that illegal activity was taking place at this business location, so they went through extreme measures to get surveillance to prove illegal activities were taking place. Utilizing a paid informant is an area of concern to ethicists who believe that informants are often paid to get away with crimes. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States that “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause”(Swanson, Chamelin, Territo, & Taylor, 2012). As a consequence, the successful use of informant in supporting requests for a warrant depends on the reliability of their information. Additionally, the source of the information is made clear and the police officer has a reasonable belief that the informant is reliable.
There are several issues with conducting surveillance illegally of a property. One of the issues is any surveillance that is obtained in an unlawful manner, cannot be used in the court of law. For example, the Exclusionary rule holds that evidence illegally seized by the police cannot be used in a trial. The rule acts as control over police behavior and specifically focuses on a failure of officers to obtain warrants authorizing them either to …show more content…

The law enforcement approached the residence 84 times without obtaining a search warrant. According to the fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine, any evidence that is obtained from unreasonable searches cannot be presented in court against the defendant. I do believe that having a search warrant affects the outcome of this case. For example, if the officers could have put in the same effort to obtain a search as they did on disguising themselves, it could change the outcome of the

Show More
Related

Jerome Scales's Conviction From A Jury In Hennepin County District Court

853 Words | 4 Pages

custodial interrogations do not need to be recorded to satisfy the due process requirements in the United States. Moreover, there were seven police officers that testified one of which was not even part of their Department so it stands to reason that it is unlikely that seven officers would attempt to circumvent the law. However, it should be noted It is believed that there should be a remedy to the law as the recording of evidence allows for a quicker and more effective examination of the interrogations and better protect the rights of citizens. “An exclusionary rule is a drastic remedy. I believe such a drastic remedy should be applied only after a full hearing of all the policy implications and with adequate notice to law enforcement.

Read More

Ddk Thermal Imager

739 Words | 3 Pages

This is primarily evidenced by the fact that the imager did not scan the inside of DLK’s house, nor were the officers on his property while they were operating the scanner, and finally, the police had reason to fear loss of evidence, and therefore scanning DLK’s house was not a violation of his rights. To begin, the thermal imager which police used to scan DLK’s home was not capable of viewing the inside of the house. To further elaborate, the thermal imager scans the outside of a

Read More

Summary Of Kyllo V. United States

549 Words | 3 Pages

In this case Kyllo v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled against the vitric of the lower courts on a 5 to 4 vote. The questions that need to be answered in this case, in my opinion serve a bigger purpose then the case at hand. The case itself is about a man named Danny Kyllo who was growing marijuana plants inside his home illegally. An officer of the U.S Interior Department got a tip that this man was illegally growing plants inside his home and went to investigate this. Obviously a tip from an unknown is not enough information to get a warrant to search the man’s property.

Read More

The Case Of North Carolina Vs. Darryl Hunt

538 Words | 3 Pages

Pursing this argument further about the use of informant’s I would now like to observe the credibility of an informant is yet another attribute that leads to the wrongful conviction of the innocent. In the case of North Carolina vs. Darryl Hunt, there were multiple informants used to testify in case. Darryl Hunt who was wrongly convicted at just the age of 19 back in 1984 and spent 19 years of his life locked away after he was accused of the murder of young white beautiful Deborah Sykes a newspaper editor at the time. Although Darryl had DNA testing to prove his innocents, judicial system place the blame on this young, at the time African American male, in order to come to a resolution. Throughout the Darryl Hunt case there were faulty eyewitness testimonies that not only corrupted the

Read More

Antoine Jones's Participation In The Drug Trade

358 Words | 2 Pages

Almost a decade ago, Antoine Jones was tried, convicted, and given a life sentence for operating a drug trade. Of course, his possession of illegal drugs and involvement in the selling of illegal drugs is enough for his conviction, but Jones argues that the police secured evidence unconstitutionally. When the police first started observing Jones on suspicions of his participation in the drug trade, they fastened a hidden GPS device on his car, in order to track Jones to a so-called “stash house,” although they did not procure a warrant to use the device. The police were able to successfully apprehend Jones based on evidence procured from the GPS. Citing the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, Jones took his case to the Supreme Court.

Read More

Explain The Four Exceptions To The Exclusionary Rule

110 Words | 1 Pages

The exclusionary rule explain that collected evidence must not be a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or else it could be inadmissible in court. The four exceptions to the Exclusionary rule are the Good-Faith exception, the Plain-View Doctrine, Clerical Errors Doctrine, and the Emergency Searches of Property. The exceptions are used to protect officers if they do something in good faith or in emergency. However these exceptions are only used to protect the officers who acted in good faith. This exceptions cannot help officers if they acted with malicious intent.

Read More

Danny Kyllo Case Study

680 Words | 3 Pages

In my opinion, yes. The officers should have gotten a warrant before using the thermal imager on Danny Kyllo’s house, even though they couldn't see any detailed activities. Using the evidence they got from the imager the government was allowed to search Danny Kyllo’s house. The government took this case a little too far.

Read More

Dk Dbq Analysis

742 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their private property, and may only be searched with probable cause. However, in a recent case, this right was violated by the government. An Oregon citizen, with the initials of DLK, was suspected of growing marijuana in his home. The federal government used a thermal imager to scan his home, and were later given a warrant to physically search his home. However, many remain divided over whether or not this scan was constitutional, as there was no warrant at the time of the scan.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule

322 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule was designed to deter police misconduct, protecting citizens from illegal search and seizures. (Ferdico, Fradella, & Totten, 2015) This rule not only deters any possible police misconduct but it also establishes innocence of a citizen before guilt. Exclusionary rule provides a window to prove reasonable doubt in order to move on to the next step to search and seize a property, etc. This rule also stops false evidence to be admitted against an individual; because a chain of command must be followed to introduced reasonable and true evidence in a court of law.

Read More

Summary Of The Johnathan Sanchez Murder Case

462 Words | 2 Pages

The murder cases can be related to the Criminal Procedures, Section 5 in chapter 10. In all three of the cases, there was a mention that when the policemen had gotten a call at the station from witnesses or bystanders, they had a probable cause to go and investigate the crime scenes and search households of the accused defendant. Usually there would be a need for a warrant, but because of the bystanders and evidence that were shown (surveillance camera, audio record, witnesses, etc), policemen are able to go and investigate without a need to get a warrant. All of the evidence that was presented to the people of the court were obtained legally and to be established that the defendant’s guilt is “beyond a reasonable doubt.” For Johnathan Sanchez murder trial, there were many stolen goods that were involved before

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Entrapment

705 Words | 3 Pages

This article wants to fix the problem of the entrapment system being unclear and sketchy. If a tactic has unclear rules and some grey areas, it can be abused and missed used. This article wants to relocate boundaries on the system and help rethink entrapment. The intended audience for this article is for our law enforcement system and government. This article wants to change the way the structure

Read More

Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

493 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.

Read More

Spying: Another Form Of Unethical Police Abuse

106 Words | 1 Pages

Another form of unethical police abuse is spying, also known as information gathering. Spying is a challenging abuse tactic to monitor or fix because it is a secret activity which makes those who participate in it all the more unethical. The victim does not know it 's happening, and it is goes unwitnessed. One way to try and stop spying or extreme information gathering is to limit the information police have access to. All information that is allowed to be collected may only be done so if that person is a reasonable suspect of having committed a crime, and the information must be relevant to that crime.

Read More

Advantages Of The Exclusionary Rule

313 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule was made to protect people 's rights and ensure justice in court but there are exceptions. One exception to the exclusionary rule is inevitable discovery. The law of inevitable discovery states that even if evidence is obtained illegally, it can still be used against someone in court if the evidence was bound to be found one way or another. For example, if the police were searching for a fugitive and broke into someone 's house without a search warrant because they believed the criminal was inside the house, and find the criminal they can still arrest him because sooner or later they would of gotten a warrant to go inside the house they suspected him to be in. If the police have to go inside someone 's home to find an

Read More

Speech On Lawyers Trial

491 Words | 2 Pages

Especially in the use of informants. Despite the name in which individuals are called whether it’s a snitch, jail house rat the outcome or goal of the individual is the same. The use of cooperating defendants and informants who provide information or testimony in exchange for financial incentives, protection, or leniency is questionable and should be analyzed and or eliminated as a tactic used in the court of law. A former federal prosecutor, someone in your exact same shoes, described informants and their actions

Read More

More about Should Police Acquire Paid Informant?

Related Topics

Open Document