Should Sherman Take Atlanta Essay

468 Words2 Pages

Sherman declines the petition to stop Sherman from taking over Atlanta and forcing its citizens to evacuate. Sherman claims that this decision is not humane but it is necessary for the war claiming that it will benefit millions more that it hurts. To make peace in America not just Atlanta Sherman claimed that he must take Atlanta. Sherman is trying to explain that Atlanta is a crucial Confederate city that is supporting the war efforts. It is being taken to damage the rebels, not to disturb the citizens of the South. Sherman justifies taking Atlanta by defining what is war. Certain things have to be done to protect and support your government and in this case Atlanta needed to be taken. Sherman blames the people of the South for the war. He would not have to take Atlanta if …show more content…

Sherman claims that he will help anyone who needs help once the war is over. I believe that Sherman that is doing nothing wrong. It is war, Sherman cannot be stagnate and hope for peace while the enemy is fighting back. Taking Atlanta is bringing the Union one step closer to end the war by weakening the South. Sherman is warning the people to leave and seek refuge and they can stop all of this if they just surrender. It is unfortunate that this had to happen but this benefited many more people than it harmed. In the next document a woman from Georgia gives a description of what the Union army did. The Union troops burnt every structure and took all of the grain and animals. They made it so it was almost impossible for the Southerners to survive without becoming scavengers. The woman feels strong hate towards the Union troops claiming that she would kill a Union troop. She sees how the already poor people had nothing and could not survive. Confederate troops were scrambled around not knowing what to