Students all over the world are being paid to raise their grades. This is important, as this could affect students negatively. They could start to develop an expectation for money. Paying students is only a temporary solution to lacking grades. It also causes students to be pressured to raise grades. Furthermore, students will lack the desire to learn. As you can see, students should not be paid to raise grades because it is a temporary solution, causes pressure to raise grades, and they will lack a desire to learn. First of all, students should not be paid for admirable grades because it is a temporary solution. Teneh Weller of the High Expectations Parental Service agrees. She says, quote,” But, while it might reignite kids’ motivation in the short term, we need to reinforce their intrinsic motivation to see lasting results,”. This shows that paying students is a temporary solution, and will not produce lasting results.The effect of this is, when students stop getting paid, their grades will plummet. Consequently, they will not be able to graduate. In conclusion, paying students is only a temporary solution to lacking grades. Furthermore, students should not be paid for admirable grades because …show more content…
They say it can be an effective incentive as long as it is used to teach. They, as in Clare Levison of the National CPA Financial Literacy Commission. She says, quote,” I don’t see anything wrong with paying for performance,”. She also says, quote, “ I think it can be an effective incentive, as long as you’re using it as a teachable moment to tell them about budgeting and saving.” But undoubtedly, this can be challenged, because even if it can be effective in motivating students, it still has many negative effects. Some effects include lack of desire to learn, lacking long term results, and pressure to raise grades. Nevertheless, students should not be paid for admirable