What if a kid committed a crime and didn't get sentenced as an adult for a murder? If you don't agree that kids or even teenagers shouldn't be sentenced to jail i think you're wrong because what if they did the crime to your kid or a family relative. I believed that they should be sent to juvenile hall or jail because a teenagner should be able to think what they’re doing and have the mentality that they're doing something really bad. For a kid it is a 50/50 because i also believe that they should know what they are doing is bad but then again they are kids. Teenagers should know they are doing because I know what am I doing but if they don't they need some help or they are really not teenagers. Teenagers should be capable of knowing what they're doing and what is a crime or not. I believe that life without parole for …show more content…
The fifteen year old boy name hasn't been released because he is still a minor but unfortunately he shot himself after he shot the teacher and the students. He shot himself because he knew what was going to happen server more than 40 years in prison in mexico or probably would of have faced a death penalty until he would of have turned 18 years old. If he were still alive he would have to pay for the murders and also serve a very long time in prison, so that's why he ended his life. This fifteen year old boy was furious at the students because they said he was bullied. Even though if you're bullied you shouldn't end someone else's life, you just have to go through it even though it is hard but ending other people's lives is way more cruel than getting bullied. If are bullied that's why you have to tell their parents or even talk to the principle I don't think it was the school's fault for not doing anything but who knows. (LA