ipl-logo

Should The Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay

593 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on the electoral college

A single citizen’s vote really does not matter. The Electoral College has been around since 1787 has a part of the Constitution. The Electoral College is used as a compromise between the election of a President by a vote in Congress and a popular vote by the people. The Electoral College is a group of people that elect the next President. The Electoral College should not be changed or abolished, but kept the same. The American government should make no changes and keep it as it is. When no one candidate wins the majority then the House of Representatives will choose the winner, and whichever major political party controls the House will choose the candidate of their party. “Since no one received a true majority (51%) the vote went to the House of Representatives, where John Quincy Adams was selected over Andrew Jackson.” (Doc 3). The National Republican Party had slightly more control on the House of Representatives than the Democratic-Republicans which is the party Andrew Jackson was running …show more content…

“Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” (Art 2 Sec 1 US Con, Doc 2). Depending on how many people live in a state determines how many electoral votes that state gets. Also each state gets two Senators so that adds two to the amount of electoral votes a state gets. For example California has 53 districts within the state so they get 53 Representatives in the House and two Senators in the Senate so California gets a total of 55 electoral votes, which makes them an important state for candidates. In Doc 4 the map shows how many votes each state gets and the Electoral College helps give the smaller sized states more power in the

Show More
Related
216 Words | 1 Pages

This article provides some options for Electoral College reforming, and how they operate. One is direct voting from instant runoff voting, which is were voters would rank their candidates from favorite to least favorite instead of choosing just one candidate, then when the votes are counted, if no single candidate has a majority, the candidate with the lowest number of votes is eliminated, and then the process continues. So basically they would win the presidency by process of elimination, and this allows voters to pick their favorite candidate without giving a vote for their least favorite directly. This proposal would also not have and negative backfire if only adopted by a few states. All of the other proposals in this article had many negative

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

The Electoral College system, written in the U.S. Constitution, holds each state entitled to some of its electors according to its representation in Congress. According to Fortier, the number of electors is similar to that of the congressional representation for the states (Fortier, p. 6). On the day of the election, the voters do not directly vote for the national presidential candidates but rather vote for an elector pledged to a particular candidate. Suppose the person who is a major popular vote in a state wins. In that case, all of that state's electoral votes are planned to go to the EM, except Maine and Nebraska, where the electors are allocated proportionately.

Read More
1482 Words | 6 Pages

Imagine how the country would be different today if we had used a direct popular vote instead of the Electoral College. The voting system came into place when getting trying to receive all of the American citizens votes was a hard task to accomplish. Also at the time, quite a few citizens were illiterate and disbursed geographically. Now with the power of technology, it is easier process to get every single American vote. The Electoral College is an unfair voting system used in Presidential elections and should be replaced with a direct popular vote.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Electoral College: For the Lose One view to consider that when voting for a president through the electoral college , voters are confused about the election process no more than they are unprepared of the consequences they ace of their votes not being counted. Voting by popular vote when electing a president is the best choice contrary to the electoral college; in favor of defying the people. Americans vote in order to elect a president of their preference to run our country. Voting by popular vote surpasses the whole electoral process by giving the people not just what they want, but what Americans need. Direct election of presidents remains solid as opposed to the “faithless” electoral college.

Read More
1338 Words | 6 Pages

Yes, I think the Electoral College system should be changed. Since this nation is a majority rule government and the mainstream vote ought to check not the electoral votes. Likewise, this ought not to rely on upon the administration, for the president is serving us, not the government. I lean toward the direct national election of our leader. I consider states important and esteem federalism.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

So New York, a state with 54,556 square miles of land and a population of 19,795,791, has 29 electoral votes while Alaska, a state with 663,268 square miles of land and a population of 738,432, has 3 electoral votes. The Electoral college was founded in 1787. Reason being, people were spread out and could not really find out who the presidential candidates were or what they stood for. So the Founding Fathers formed The Electoral College, so the

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

This compromise helped give each state equal say in the government. As John Samples said to the Cato Institute in In Defense of the Electoral College, “ … the Electoral College makes sure that the states count in presidential elections… an important part of our federalist system - a system worth preserving… federalism is central to our grand constitutional effort to restrain power.” (Doc C). Since this nation is founded on federalism (the sharing of power between national and state governments), it only makes sense that each individual state would want equal say in the nation’s government. Samples knew that to keep the government running smoothly, each state needed equal representation in the government, thus the Electoral College.

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

One reason the Electoral College should be abolished is that one of the candidates could win the popular vote and still end up losing the election. On November 8th, 2016 Donald Trump was elected president because the Electoral College voted for him. Approximately thirty out of the fifty states’ electoral colleges voted for Donald Trump, he ended with 290 Electoral College votes. He had lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by about one million people because the vote of the citizens in the US has no value. The Electoral College votes are the only ones with value.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Electoral college has been with us since the birth of the constitution, and to this day we are still using this type of system to this day. The Electoral College is a system that the United States uses to elect our upcoming presidents and vice presidents. Each state has electors equal to their senate member and house of representatives, however who ever gets the highest popular vote in the state gets the electoral vote. The issue is the Electoral College do not give votes to the people, but to the states. Which has some unfair consequences.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Others may think their votes go wasted, due to the “winner-takes-all” method in use for the majority of states, such as a voter voting for Al Gore might of believed in the election of 2000, being Bush won the majority of electoral votes while Gore won the popular vote. However, it is erroneous to believe their votes go wasted, being they were simply cast on the losing side of the popular vote within the state, even more provided by the electoral college which preserves federalism by representing states as evenly as possible, thus protecting small states it does not waste votes being it grants all states a justifiable amount of electoral votes in correspondence with their population. In addition, if it was based on national popular vote only, would people assert that their vote for Bush went wasted, as a result of Gore’s victory? Furthermore, the electoral college preserves federalism by promoting a national consensus on our choice for president, being it leads to candidates seeking national coalition, thus enabling them to win with the majority of electoral votes and eliciting the correct president to maintain stability in the union. Although, some may say the electoral college is undemocratic or goes against the will of the people, being a candidate might win presidency as a result of the majority of electoral votes but have less popular votes than the opposing candidate.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

Electoral College Abolishment People always want things to be perfect, from the way they look to how their shopping experience is. As we all know, nothing is perfect, including the United States government. One way to make the government less imperfect is to eliminate the Electoral College. The Electoral College was created more than 200 years ago because the Founding Fathers thought that Americans weren’t educated enough to vote for their own leader, which is definitely not true now.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

The electoral college also helps the small states have an opinion that actually is heard in the presidential election. In class, it was discussed that Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota together, though their combined population is less than that of Oklahoma, each of those states has three electoral votes, whereas Oklahoma just has seven votes. Going by electoral votes, a candidate would have a better chance at winning the election if they won over Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota versus Oklahoma. With the electoral college, a candidate could win over all thirty-nine small states and win the entire election. Though the candidate could be supported by less than a quarter of the population,

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

First, with the specifications of the electoral college there only needs to be 270 electoral votes to a person for them to win. With this rule only 12 states need to be won CA, TX, FL, NY, IL, PA, OH, MI, GA, NC, and NJ(DOC A) and this is only a part of the overall population of America. While

Read More
1351 Words | 6 Pages

The states gets to how many electoral votes by the number of Senators and the House of Representatives. The Constitution has never mention

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

(Black, 2012) So, while it is clear that the Electoral College was set up to ensure all states have a voice, it now seems to have the ability to take away the voice of the people. It is necessary to look at our voting process and make the necessary changes needed to ensure the process of electing our President represents the voice of the people. By switching to a majority vote we ensure that the voice of all people are not only heard, but are represented equally, which is how it should be under the one-person, one-vote

Read More

More about Should The Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay

Open Document