Do we know the meaning of the words monarchy and democracy, which we hear on a daily basis? For every political and historical concept their historical background and social interaction are its defining factors which determine the basis of the concept. Hence, in order for us to understand the differences and similarities between democracy and monarchy we must know and analyze the history and social mechanics of these concepts. Let us explain and make brief comparison of the two as follows. In monarchy, the prince was the sole wielder of power and he was accountable to no one but God. Because God was whom he was receiving power from. The prince was a mediator between God and the public. In fact, this kind of a ruling has never been able to establish. Because even the most despotic had to protect some people such as rich and powerful minorities or reverends. Moreover, the lack of a proper communication system left no choice to the ruler but to rule far away regions of the county by means of a separate agent. On top of that, authority was reserved to the only ruler and his counselors and the public had no say in this. Monarchy was the most common regime for centuries. Most of the time is it resembled its traditional definition. However around the end of the 18th century a new form of monarchy appeared for the first time: constitutionalism. In constitutionalism the ruler 's authority was defined and limited by a constitution. This type of monarchy was usually parliamentary and