Fictional dystopian societies have made it easier for a government to dehumanize citizens, as they revoke the knowledge and exclusive opinions of those who have chosen to rebel. 1984, written by George Orwell, and Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, are two unique works of dystopian fiction, in which both significantly express the limit of narrowed thought and understanding through abnormal language, while “Chapter 3” of Black Boy indicates the “emancipating power of language” through the words of profound meaning. Philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein states, the “limits of my language are the limits of my mind. All I know is what I have for,” thus relating to the media who contains the limits of human expression, and therefore the limits …show more content…
As a result of Winston’s neglect of the rules, he was able to maintain his own perspective, as he attempted to defeat Big Brother’s ‘sinister plan’. “You’re a flaw in the pattern, Winston. You are a stain that must be wiped out….when finally you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will,” stated O’Brien (page 255). In the book, free will depicted the Ministry’s truthful judgments of the state of mind, which happened to correspond to Winston’s freedom of beliefs. When O’Brien was torturing Winston, he revealed Big Brother’s notions of simply destroying the rebelling mind of any person who had dared to testify against The Party’s core values. In future pages, O’Brien states, “Oceania is at war with Eurasia” (page 257). One really does not know if Oceania is actually at war with Eurasia. In no common reference was it ever admitted that the two powers had at any time been grouped along different lines, but, since it was merely a sense of stealthy knowledge, the citizens of Oceania had put all of their trust into The Party. The citizens’ trust symbolized the destruction of language and the need for society to formerly return to