Similarities Between Beyond Good And Evil And Martin Luther King

Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil and Martin Luther King's Letter from Birmingham Jail are two completely different pieces of writing that have opinions on how government and society should be run together. This comparative analysis will focus on how these two writings are morally and ethical structured. Nietzsche was an intelligent German philosopher who was materialistic and based his materialism style of philosophy off of life-affirmation where there is life beyond the realities of the current world or there is no God. He stated that the best form of government is a aristocracy which the concept in the power pyramid everyone despises the ones in the class below them. Martin Luther King Jar. However was a devout Christian pastor who was

He is biased towards his beliefs and works with a narrow minded standpoint. He uses the aristocracy form of government, because he believed they were the most powerful, to try and prove his views. Nietzsche states that everything is based on sheer power and that all humans are only natural beasts. The law of beast or what he claims to run a person is only survival of the fittest and that the strong will always win. Nietzsche always assumes there is no God which limits his availability to answers. He has no evidence for his statements which makes him lack credibility and he tends to leave no room for other opinions. Beyond Good and Evil is basically a detailed way to live life and by following Nietzsche's "rule-book" society will flourish forever. This book however presents more of a commanding structure. People are often being criticized by Nietzsche and he claims that without his help and guidance society could cease to exist. History proves that aristocracy governments do not work and all have eventually had a downfall. During this paper Nietzsche will commit more than a few logical fallacies. These facts show that Nietzsche's claims do not have a solid backbone. He also begs the question when he makes the statement that humans are like the Javanese plants because they always tend to dominate the weaker by using them to climb higher in status. This is known to be false because of the natural

Piece Letter from Birmingham Jail has a completely different outlook on how the central government should be ran and how the government can be used to create equality and a near perfect system for society to flourish in. King is faced with the difficult challenge of leading his race of people who have been segregated and mistreated for decades. He kept his focus on doing all this while maintaining peace and having no violence in his movement. King wanted their journey to be both morally and ethically just; to prove that inequality can be abolished using logical means. King believed that a democratic government, like the one practiced in the United States, had the potential to allow the black race to get its equality. King's wordings in his speeches and statements were often edited in an evil way to try and give him a bad figure. He answered these critics by explaining laws versus "just" laws. In the letter he explains how violation of a parade permit can place him in jail and his rights from the Fifth Admendment give him no protection. He states how a law cannot be "democratically structured" when the minority have no part in creating it because of discriminatory practices. These forms of equivocation for example his appeals to appropriate authority gave him strong philosophical sense. Martin Luther King Jar. Believed that there are natural laws implanted in every human being from birth. He used these beliefs and pathos or emotional appeal to prove