When viewed independently, novels Frankenstein and The Chosen impart many dissimilar themes; they especially diverge in the message of fulfilling the creator archetype. Creating figures of each novel are equally passionate about their ambitions, and both are committed and work diligently; whereas Reb Saunders son, his “creation”, shows the results of Reb Saunders exertions by fulfilling his father's hopes for him. When considering characters Victor Frankenstein from Frankenstein and Reb Saunders from the The Chosen, the contrast in purpose of both creators conveys that the conclusion of the creator's efforts is in part determined by their intentions. To uncover the intentions of characters Victor Frankenstein and Reb Saunders , it is …show more content…
Miserable himself, that he may render no other wretched he ought to die.” Victor has created a reckless being; a lurid creature who hungers for power over his creator’s life, one who frightens and appalls his own maker. Antagonistically, Reb Saunders has molded a being whom he takes pride in, whom fulfills his objective in creating, and whom does not yield fear : “I have no more fear now. All his life he will be a tzaddik.” Just as Reb Saunder wished, Danny grew up with a tzaddik heart and a compassionate soul by virtue of his up bringing, reflecting his father's intentions for raising him as he …show more content…
The most conspicuous display of intent for Victor is subsequent to hearing his professor's attempts to persuade into the study natural science; it is then he conceives an idea: “trending in the steps already marked, I will pioneer a new way, explore the unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation … a new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.” In this passage, Victor demonstrates his ardity for command and control over another being. He strives for power unrivaled by any other, and intends to pursue such egomaniacal reflections. While Victor establishes that his intent and motivation for creation in claiming supreme gratitude from his product, Reb Saunders expresses an opposite motive and desired outcome. Explaining the purpose for raising his son in silence he says, “A heart I need for a son, a soul I need for a son, compassion I want for my son, righteousness, mercy, strength to suffer and carry pain.” Reb Saunders exclaims that he wishes for his son to be able to care for others, to be able care for himself, and to be conscientious and just. He thinks not of whether his son is gracious towards him, only that his son is a good person; it is apparent his conclusion was drawn from a place of love for his