ipl-logo

Similarities Between Lincoln And Reagan By Professor Shastri

646 Words3 Pages

In his article “On race relations, Republicans can’t be the party of both Lincoln and Reagan“, Professor Shastri argues that these two presidents held opposite positions on the cultural and economic dimensions regarding race relations. First of all, he discusses how they differ on the way they intervened in the South. This ties with the topic of federalism, since Lincoln used the national abolishment of slavery as a medium to unite the states that wanted to rule themselves instead of being part of the Union. He valued equality more than democracy because obeying the racist majority in this case meant taking away the rights of the Black Americans. On the other hand, Reagan focused on the rights of the states to handle racial discrimination the way they thought most convenient. Reagan emphasized order over the other values that make up the American political culture. Then Shastri develops his argument by analyzing the approaches of both presidents to economic decisions that affected African …show more content…

I personally found it disrespectful how enthusiastically he alleged his support for “states’ rights” (which spread racism) in Neshoba County when the KKK had killed civil rights’ workers there 16 years earlier. Southern racists often supported states’ rights so they could be free to have slaves since there would be no national standard to obey. Long after it was enacted, Reagan attempted to weaken the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed literacy tests and prerequisites to vote. Providing the states the liberty whether to give blacks the right to vote or not would be like mocking all the progress and sacrifices we made in the Civil War. Indeed, Abraham Lincoln risked everything to preserve the very foundations of this country and used slavery as his main tool to accomplish this seemingly impossible

Show More
Related
146 Words | 1 Pages

United States President, Ronald Reagan, and United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, believed in the economic principles of Friedrich Von Hayek. They believed in free markets and free enterprise. They also believed that governments are not to interfere with the markets and the economy at all. Both leaders removed centralized planning of their economies. They also privatized state-owned businesses, markets, and allowed the markets to decide prices and regulate itself.

Read More
1954 Words | 8 Pages

The Hairstons is the phenomenal story of the biggest family in America, the Hairston group. With a few thousand highly contrasting individuals, the Hairstons offer a mind boggling and convincing history: separated in the season of subjection, they now hold onto their past as one gang. This book speaks the truth the historical backdrop of a white slaveholding family in the American South, and their slaves. The white family, affirmed (Hurston), impart their history and their name to a large number of the descendants of their dark slaves, who proclaim the name as composed.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

The Radical and the Republican by James Oakes Book Review James Oakes’ The Radical and the Republican is a thorough and captivating account of two of America’s most distinguished figures, Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas. In his intriguing and polished work, Oakes examines the issues of slavery, race, politics, and war in America during the mid-1800’s. Though both Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas engendered immense social and political change throughout the Civil War era, the relationship between the two men is often neglected.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

People’s choices decide if history will view them as a martyr or a murder. Both Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are considered martyrs by history. As Lincoln had just won the Civil War and Caesar had just defeated Pompey, they were well liked at the time. But almost immediately after these events Brutus and J.W Booth subsequently killed them due to their belief that they were doing what was right for the nation and because they felt pressure from their past, therefore while some differences between Brutus and Booth are evident, the similarities are prominent.

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass are American heroes with each exemplifying a unique aspect of the American spirit. In his recent study, "The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics" (2007), Professor James Oakes traces the intersecting careers of both men, pointing out their initial differences and how their goals and visions ultimately converged. Oakes is Graduate School Humanities Professor and Professor of History at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He has written extensively on the history of slavery in the Old South. Oakes reminds the reader of how much Lincoln and Douglass originally shared.

Read More
107 Words | 1 Pages

Ronald Reagan was elected in 1980. He had disenchantment with government and politics in his past. Not only was he in depth and acknowledged with the operation of politics, but was as well in depth with the intricacies of entertainment. His presidential election contained a transformation that was at the least of most American’s expectations, with his past of show business. His beginning to presidency was the point of a convergence, which that involved his acting career, and then becoming a dominant figure in politics, and in the nation.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

He started economic reforms called, “Reaganomics” which spurred growth and cut taxes for others. By this you can see that he really cared for the rights others had. I also think that it showed how wise he was to create his own reform that assisted the people economically. This helped because it reduced the growth that the government was spending. This is another important thing he did for us.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

As a young country, the United States was a land of prejudice and discrimination. Wanting to grow their country, white Americans did what they had to in order to make sure that they were always on top, and that they were always the superior race. It did not matter who got hurt along the way because everything that they did was eventually justified by their thinking that all other races were inferior to them. A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki describes the prejudice and discrimination against African Americans and Native Americans in the early history of the United States.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

After the Civil War in 1865, Republicans in Congress introduced a series of Constitutional Amendments to secure civil and political rights for African Americans. The right that gave black men the privilege to vote provoked the greatest controversy, especially in the North. In 1867, Congress passed the law and African American men began voting in the South, but in the North, they kept denying them this basic right (“African Americans,” 2016). Republicans feared that they would eventually lose control of Congress on the Democrats and thought that their only solution was to include the black men votes. Republicans assumed that all African American votes would go to all the Republicans in the North, as they did in the South and by increasing the

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

What is the purpose of racism? In Theorizing Nationalism, Day and Thompson discuss how racism and nationalism are precisely the same. Racism has the ability to help build nationalism, especially in our young country. LeMay and Barkan in U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Laws & Issues talk about how this racism is used during a specific time period, 1880 to 1920, in the United States of America. Both of these articles argue that when the United States was in a time of peril, they used racism as a unifying factor to bring the country together and as a way to put a group of people lower than themselves to bring their status to a higher point in society.

Read More
1493 Words | 6 Pages

How the Jim Crow Laws Oppressed African Americans Racism has been a prominent issue throughout american history. It started when American Colonists traveled to Africa and kidnapped people, bringing them back to America and putting them through extremely harsh conditions. As time progressed slavery had changed its course and the North won the Civil War, and President Abraham Lincoln announced the abolishment of slavery. Although slavery had been (verbed), the tension between slaves and slave owners was greatly present.

Read More
279 Words | 2 Pages

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a large portion of Americans were restricted from civil and political rights. In American government in Black and White (Second ed.), Paula D. McClain and Steven C. Tauber and Vanna Gonzales’s power point slides, the politics of race and ethnicity is described by explaining the history of discrimination and civil rights progress for selective groups. Civil rights were retracted from African Americans and Asian Americans due to group designation, forms of inequality, and segregation. These restrictions were combatted by reforms such as the Thirteenth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifteenth amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, etc. Although civil and political

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

With air-conditioning, skyscrapers, interstates, rural improvement to shopping malls, the new South was no more plainly separated from the rest of the country. The political, economic and social change in the South brought historical movements, belief systems and patterns into the Modern South. I will be concentrating on Modern South 's political parties, social identities, culture wars, environmental conditions and change in economic aspects in the middle of WWII and today. By the most recent years of the twentieth century, the Republican Party had turned into a noteworthy power in the South.

Read More
1319 Words | 6 Pages

In “Dog Whistle Politics” Ian Haney Lopez starts off his book by first talking about how the use of the dog whistle has been used for example on page ix it is said that the words are used to “ repeat the use of blasting of criminals and welfare cheating, illegal aliens, and sharia law”. ( Lopez ix) After Mr. Lopez finishes his use of the word he goes on to not only talk about obama but the main point of the section he is writing his professor Mr. Bell and how he was right all along in his thought of white dominates and how they adapt to society. Lopez goes on to talk about how the republican party is mostly a white party and it has been record that the middle class is mostly white as well as how dog whistling is not just white people and the middle class but it is everyone that uses it. Next Ian Haney Lopez talks about the

Read More
1747 Words | 7 Pages

In this address he makes a sweeping critique of liberalism, big government, and federal payments. (Encyclopedia) In this speech, known as “A Time for Choosing” Reagan used logos, pathos, and mood to invoke people’s feelings about making the right choice when choosing their leader in order for society to have a stronger and successful future. Historical background

Read More

More about Similarities Between Lincoln And Reagan By Professor Shastri

Related Topics

Open Document