Frederick Douglass and Malcom X created some of the most famous African-American pieces to ever be released. They were written to reveal how hard the process of learning to read was back during the slave era. Douglass had a chapter in his narrative ”Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” called “Learning to Read and Write,” it was written in 1845. Malcolm X’s “Learning to Read,” is an excerpt from,” the Autobiography of Malcolm X“. These two pieces were written more than a century apart yet several common themes can still be identifies.
Rhetorical Analysis Essay Prompt: Malcolm X and Martin Luther King The year of 1963 was controversial for the reason that African-Americans were segregated and activist leaders such as Malcolm X and Martin Luther King had different ideas of reforming against the social norms of that time. While Malcolm X and MLK were both human rights activists, they had different approaches towards reform movements. MLK and Malcolm X both use rhetorical techniques such as anaphora and allusion to convey the purposes of their speeches that address mainly African Americans. MLK and Malcolm X were African Americans who were activist leaders for human rights.
The social revolutionaries Malcolm X and Fredrick Douglass would most likely have similar points of view due to their experiences being black individuals in a white majority. Frederick Douglass was an African American abolitionist and civil rights activist in the 20th century. He believed in the importance of African Americans in education and spoke out against segregation. On the other hand, Malcolm X felt that African Americans needed to resist oppression and reduce racism. In the excerpt, “Not just an American Problem, but a world problem”, Malcolm X states, “We are living in a society that is by and large controlled by people who believe in racism, and practice segregation and discrimination and racism” (Malcolm X, page 2).
The life experiences of Gandhi and Malcolm X have similarities. Malcolm X and Gandhi both have fought for civil rights in the countries that they both have lived. Gandhi did it by not listening and just doing what he pleased. Gandhi would get told not to do something and it would be perfectly legal but the British empire would arrest him for Civil Disobedience and then arrested again for sedition and sentenced to six years in prison. Malcolm X Ran into the same trouble Gandhi had, but was arrested for burglary and sentenced to 10 years in prison and got the nickname Satan for the teaching of hatred towards God and learned of the prophet Muhammad.
Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
Malcolm X began his speech by urging African Americans to submerge their differences and realize that they all have a common problem - political oppression, economic exploitation, and social degradation at the hands of the white man. Malcolm X was one of the most dynamic, dramatic and influential figures of the civil rights era. He was an apostle of black nationalism, self respect, and uncompromising resistance to white oppression. Malcolm X was a polarizing figure who both energized and divided African Americans, while frightening and alienating many whites.
The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.
Both arguments use the literary devices to highlight their main point and emphasize it in a way not previously stated. By restating the argument to be more easily understood, both MLK and Malcolm X broaden their audiences to reach more people with their essays. Reasserting their main points with literary devices, both authors establish a specific target group they are
Malcolm X and Bill Mckibben…two individuals who have/had a lot of words to say about the current society they were/are in. Malcolm X, who was a spokesman for the Nation of Islam and had fought for human rights, was a trailblazer for black pride in the 1960’s. He had many followers who believed in what he was saying and how he conducted himself. In the same way, Bill Mckibben also had words to say about what was going wrong with the world. His words were more focused on the environment…rather than social injustices.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two profound African American figures in history. They both fought for equality and to better humanity. But, the tactics they used were very different. Their different views may have been rooted from the where they were raised. Martin Luther King Jr. grew up in a middle class family and received a very solid education.
It was relevant because he spoke on problems still troubling the world 50 years later. He also showed signs of being a very effective communicator. Since this indeed is a class on how to be an effective communicator, Malcolm X set a very good example. He made sure he was credible, he related to the audience and as well had a very purposeful speech. Malcolm X set the path for many people wanted to change the world.
Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,
Malcolm X was admired by many, for his courage and intelligence. In his essay “prison Studies” Malcolm X writes about his journey in prison, he tells us how he met his friend Bimbi who inspired him to become better and so he started his own “prison” education. Malcolm X’s idea of freedom is knowledge. In his “Prison Studies “he said :” I never had been so truly free” ( “prison Studies” Malcolm X) . Back in his prison days, he used a small light that pierced through his cell just to be able to continue reading the dictionary.
Between the lines, Malcolm X showed us his love, passion, and gratitude for books, and to his purpose of life, to promote human rights activities, especially for African-Americans. Readers could not feel him without all the techniques he
