ipl-logo

Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Hitler

725 Words3 Pages

Two people I chose to compare with Aristotle and Machiavelli are Martin Luther King Jr. and Adolph Hitler. Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who became the leader in the civil rights movement from 1954 until his death in 1968. Adolf Hitler was a German politician who was the leader of the Nazi Party and leader of Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945. Martin Luther King Jr is in the middle of the graph but is a little closer to Aristotle. King Jr is closer to Aristotle because he did everything for the greater good. He wanted everyone to be treated equal. Martin Luther King Jr did protest peacefully while still gaining power. Martin Luther King Jr illustrates persuasion, which to Aristotle is important. King Jr …show more content…

Hitler used numerous Machiavellian ideas to win his respective place in Germany's government. Machiavelli believed a prince must seem good but also must slam the hammer down when needed. Hitler made himself look good and he said he can save Germany from their bad times. Everyone in Germany loved Hitler even when his plan included getting rid of every jew. If a person acquires power through fortune the best way to maintain power is to use fear. Hitler’s power evolved through his use of force and fear. Machiavelli says that human nature praises certain qualities and blame others, but there is no way that humans can do all the good things while avoiding the bad thing. Hitler was smart and never got blamed for most of the things he did. Hitler just blamed others. Hitler is like Aristotle in the way that he is persuasive. Adolph Hitler convinced many to join the Nazi Party, during his “Trial for Treason” speech. Anyone who disagreed with Hitler died because no one was allowed power over him. Hitler is also like Henry the V because he wanted to get power anyway he could, even if it was a little bad. He wanted to kill all jews because he hated jews for some weird reason. Many believe he was a jew himself. Hitler was a bad person only wanted power. He thought he could change and rule the world by getting rid of, at first, the jews. Luckily though, he lost the

Show More
Related
407 Words | 2 Pages

Petar Djuric English 11 Becich 1 2/3/2017 Rough Draft     Martin Luther King Jr and Chris McCandless inspired a lot of people in the world and have succeed and have failed throughout their quests. King was a civil rights activist. King wanted blacks to have freedom from discrimination, equal opportunity in jobs and different kinds of employment, equal education, rights to vote, housing, and equal access to public facilities. (1) McCandless was a young man who wanted to get away from the materialistic lifestyle.(3) In ways, McCandless and King were similar because they both were determined, strong, devoted, and hardworking.

Read More
137 Words | 1 Pages

Earl Warren was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for most of the nineteen fifties and sixties. During the civil rights movement, we think of names such as Martin Luther King or Malcom X, but we forget about the judges that presided over the civil rights cases. Warren and his fellow justices were responsible for the Supreme Court victories that the civil rights movement had during this time. One of Warren’s earliest accomplishments, after just being appointed Chief Justice, was the ruling on Brown v. Board of Education where he was able to get a unanimous decision ruling that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. Chief Justice Earl Warren and the Justices of the Supreme Court should be remembered for expanding the boundaries

Read More
266 Words | 2 Pages

Both Martin Luther and King Henry Vlll had similars goals for the catholic church. Both wanted the reformation of the church and disagreed strongly with the Pope. However both of them had different motives for why they were challenging the church. Luther's goal was based on religion where Henry's was based on himself and what he could gain from it. Martin Luther was known for leading a group called the Lutherans.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Hitler promised revenge against those he claimed had done this to the German people. Hitler was able to use propaganda to motivate the German people to follow him. The citizens of Germany gladly gave Hitler control of their lives for the promise of security and wealth. Once incremental control was relinquished to Hitler, his government took large steps and then total control over German

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

The major cause of Hitler’s political success was due to the tremendous amount of fear that people associated with him. The fear of Hitler is what forced the government to grant him the enabling act, which then lead to the rise of Natsism. President Paul Von Hindenburg thought of Hitler as a threat to their power, so as a tactic to suppress his authority, they thought by electing him into office and appointing him chancellor was enough for him to feel some sort of power and settle down. It gave Hitler a voice in the government and a say what goes on in decision making,so they assumed this would satisfied Hitler and keep him contained. They were wrong.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

Donald Trump vs. Adolf Hitler When thinking of two memorable men in history, Adolf Hitler and Donald Trump, both stand out for their controversial ideologies. There are stark differences between Hitler and Trump however, the similarities cannot be ignored. Their large personalities and ignorance, either make them hated or loved by their countries people. While it is eerie to compare a current U.S. presidential candidate to a man who is responsible for the death of 11 million people it's important that we recognize their similarities and not let history repeat itself.

Read More
1505 Words | 7 Pages

King dreamed of a society in which all races could coexist equally. He knew that ethically it was his duty to stand up against unjust laws and although he did do so by using violence he made sure that Black people’s voice was heard. Many of the steps King took such as Montgomery bus boycott, which was a boycott of public buses by African Americans validate many of Malcolm X’s assumptions. When this boycott started to affect the pockets of bus companies that is what led to change and ultimately social revolution. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were aware that in order for there to be change that they needed to directly affect what White men cared about, business and politics.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr.’s views helped create other activist groups that fought against more direct challenges and used nonviolent ways of protest. These groups helped from many civil rights laws. Malcolm X had a different perspective than MLK. He felt whatever form of protest that was needed to succeed was the form he should use. He felt that blacks should be more concerned with helping each other before helping anyone else.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

When King got older, he studied sociology; therefore, King’s beliefs were heavily affected by Mahatma Gandhi and activist Bayard Rustin, who he studied regularly (“Martin Luther King, Jr”). King wanted equality and human rights for everyone, specifically the disadvantaged and victims of inequality. (“Martin Luther King, Jr”). While Malcolm X did not always take the peaceful way to achieve things, Martin Luther King did. He fought for rights through peaceful speeches and protests.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

The famous manual “The Prince” by Machiavelli remains to this day, the main book to go to for the advice on how to be a good politician. This book contains 26 chapters describing the often crafty, cunning and corrupt methods by which a prince can obtain and maintain political power. It was written in 1413 and Adolf Hitler may well have been one of these politicians to chart the advice of Machiavelli, particularly around the time of the Second World War as he led many people between 1939 and 1945. Hitler followed Machiavellian principles through the advice points on punishments, deceit and fear control.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

The famous manual “The Prince” by Machiavelli is still to this day the main resource that explains and gives advice on how to be a good politician. In 26 chapters it holds powerful rules that Machiavelli believed were key points that one must follow to become a successful politician. Machiavelli was a politician, historian, philosopher, humanist, and writer and lived in Florence during the Renaissance and changed the world with his political philosophies. Like Machiavelli, Adolf Hitler was also a powerful politician and the chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945. He was also the dictator of Nazi Germany from 1939 to 1945.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

As people grow and mature some of their motives stay the same but it is their tactics, their way of getting what they want, that is what changes. And in this case Hitler had grown into so much power and had sunk his roots into the people when they were in a time of need after world war one, and they found refuge in him. They saw him as a very powerful individual who seemed to know what he wanted ad how he was going to get it. So in short they trusted him with their lives. And Hitler got so power hungry that he was willing to do whatever to create a master race, one that he saw fit to rule and populate the earth.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Martin Luther King and Adolph Hitler were alluring speakers but with different desires. Both had the extreme ability to attract to the masses through the spoken word, this being obvious in some of their famous speeches. Putting aside Hitler 's ghastly desires and outcomes and just examining the interesting and well- liked delivery of his speeches I feel that today he would have been worthy of the trainers trainer certification. The persuasion that he learned and developed in handling crowds, even large crowds of thousands, involved pacing the objections he knew that they would have against his argument and using them in the service of persuasion. He did that by pacing and leading.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

Hitler always had a deep desire for power. When Germany was in an economy a political crisis, Hitler saw this advantage for him. Aldof Hitler was short-tempered, strict and brutal. And Hitler is responsible for the death of millions. Like Macbeth, Macbeth killed the innocent to keep his rise of power.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Everyone has heard of Adolf Hitler and how he tried to conquer Europe. He attempted doing it at the right time when everyone thought that Germany was going to lose everything, because, the national debt and inflation was so high. Germany was so desperate for anyone to help them that Adolf Hitler saw a chance to step up and be in charge of everything. Hitler was very good at acting like he really cared about his people. He claimed to the German people that he would help with unemployment, help businesses, success to the failed businesses, and to expand their army to make them more powerful.

Read More

More about Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Hitler

Related Topics

Open Document