Imperial Rome and Mauryan China both had many similarities and differences. From the religions that they practiced to their social classes, there is a lot of rich history for both of the countries to have similar and different. Augustus Caesar was crowned the first emperor of Rome after his victory at Actium. He created Principate government which was a traditional monarchy combined with the newer republic government. On the other hand, India kept their strong central government ruled by an emperor. Ashoka, the Mauryan emperor, valued and practiced Buddhism in his rule.
When Augustus ruled over Rome, Rome started to prosper and come back from its downfall. Everyone started to worship the emperor. The emperor role eventually morphed into a dictatorship type of
…show more content…
People were allowed to practice any religion as long as it didn’t interfere with the law code. Judaism was the prominent religion for hundreds of years, but Christianity became the popular religion after Judaism fizzled out at the end of the Roman Empire. In India, the government was controlled but not by a specific person. The influence of religion caused regional rulers to be able to hold power to closely watch their local territories, not just have a supreme ruler loosely make decisions. Rome also had a caste system with wealthy people at the top of the rankings, the middle class in the middle of the rankings, and the slaves and servants at the bottom. Eventually, the lower class people got to start being part of Roman laws and local government.
In India, the people were categorized into five social classes: Jatis Brahmin (priests and teachers), Kshatriya (warriors and nobles), Vaishyas (merchants and traders), Shudras (laborers and peasants), and Pariah (untouchables). India enforced the caste system and other Hindu beliefs into their people's everyday