Diverging contextual influences shape the way in which dystopian texts portray worlds in which oppressive societal control and the illusion of utopia is maintained through propaganda and indoctrination at the expense of altruistic human values. Fritz Lang’s expressionist 1927 film Metropolis and George Orwell’s 1949 dystopic novel 1984 critique the imposition of conformity due to unbridled authority in society, as well as convey the importance of human connections for a harmonious, progressive society. Through the comparative study of these texts, responders attain an enhanced understanding of the context’s influence on the representation of these multifaceted societal concerns. Excessive authorial power in society deny individuals personal …show more content…
The eradication of “ordinary human feeling(s)” is portrayed in cumulative listing “Never again will [Winston] be capable of love… courage, or integrity”, reflective of the impact of Stalinist punishment regimes for rebels. Orwell establishes the innate desire for intellectual freedom and autonomous thought in Winston's first act of rebellion against the Party in the repeated entry of "DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER" in his diary. Winston's rebellious affair with Julia results in Winston's feelings of anger and hatred to shift to more compassionate affections, emotions which Lang also emphasises in Metropolis, "At the sight of the words, I love you, the desire to stay alive had welled in him". Parson's dream, "I started talking in my sleep... 'Down with Big Brother!'" revealing that the intrinsic desire for freedom can never be suppressed, yet, irony in Parson’s “doleful pride” at his daughter denouncement of his thoughtcrime exemplifies the division within familial structures, posing as a microcosm for the loss of human connections and ensuing societal divisions. Hence, due to the political upheaval, which arose preceding the Cold War, Orwell's perspective on his contemporary society gives rise to the bleak ending of 1984, depicted in the metaphor "[the] bullet was entering his brain". In 1984, Orwell defends the individual liberties of expression as being necessary for our humanity, just as Lang emphasised the need for empathy and compassion for the functioning of