More handpicked essays just for you.
New england and mid atlantic colonies similarities and differences
Similarities and differences between new england and middle colonies
Similarities and differences between new england and middle colonies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The middle colonies were set differently from the New England and Chesapeake Bay regions, instead of searching for a place to colonize or be given the authority to use founded land by Britain, the middle colonies, owned by Charles I and the Duke of York, used the lands as a way to pay off debts or as political favors. The new proprietaries intended uses of the colonies were for wealth and freedom to practice any religion. William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania, successfully created the first, middle colony a “colony of Haven for the children of light” (American Yawp, chapter 3) thus attracted a wide range of people from different nations. Because of the political and religious freedoms, a harmony of mixed towns of French, Dutch, German, Swedes,
We're going to be take a look at the differences and similarities of the British North American colonies Pennsylvania and Virginia in the 1700s. William Penn was the founder of Pennsylvania, the purpose for Pennsylvania from the beginning was to be a colony of Harmony. When William Penn founded Pennsylvania he created a Quaker religious imperative for the peaceful treatment of Indians. this allowed Pennsylvania to live relatively peacefully with Native Americans. Just as the Quakers wanted to live peacefully with Native Americans they also didn't care for slavery.
In the Southern Colonies, the major crops that were farmed were tobacco, cotton, and other cash crops. The crops were also grown on large plantations whereas, in New England the crops were grown on small farms. The economies of each region were also very different. The Southern Colonies focused mostly on farming but in New England, slave trade and lumber working were main sources of income.
New England, Middle, and the Southern colonies were alike in many ways. New England, Middle, and the Southern colonies were also different in a number of ways. To begin, New England's economy was powered mostly by manufacturing factories. New England colonies did not believe in slavery so the social standing were not the same. New England had a stronger economy.
The main similarities these 2 colonies have is that they were not big on slavery. For New England they just couldn’t turn slavery into a profit and in the Middle Colonies they just didn’t really use slavery. New England and the Middle Colonies did have the same weather. They had Very hot summers and very cold winters.
According to table1, New England had a comparatively low slavery rate. There were 5771 slaves during 1790-1860. New England colonies primarily use slaves for household purpose. They did not have the huge slave population. On the other hand, Middle Colonies had 26.5% more slaves than New England colonies around 153,020 slaves.
Differences of Southern and New England Colonies The Southern and New England colonies were both established by English settlers. These two regions had very distinct societies derived from the different goals held by the two. In the South they aimed for economic prosperity while in New England they were seeking religious freedom. These two regions were oriented around two different goals causing two very distinct societies. The major differences are divided into three factors, social - in the south they relied on conventional class based society while placing no emphasis on education and in the New England colonies it was heavily church connected making sure everyone was successful in education and literacy , economic - in the south they were dependent on growing cash crops and using plantation systems whereas in the New England colonies they depend
The Middle colonies were known as the Breadbasket colonies (“Colonial America”). They were also known for their ethnic diversity (“Colonial America.”). The people in the middle colonies ate 1 pound of bread per day, the mills used to produce the bread was powered by rivers to crush their grains (“Colonial America.”). Farming in the middle colonies, had a decent climate and very good soil, and it helped with the farming (“Coming to America”).
In fact, with all their differences, the three regions later combined to create the great nation known today as the United States. One of the big differences between the three regions was their topography and climate, which led to different types of agriculture. For instance, the New England Colonies had many mountains and forests due to its glaciers. Since it had sandy soil, short summers and long lasting winters, the Puritans who landed in New England weren’t able to farm many types of crops. The cold weather negatively impacted their agriculture.
Southern colonies society was built around their crops, slaves, and plantations. In the Northern colonies they built their society around religion and being fishing. There economy grew from fishing, mainly for with Cod. Religion played a huge role in the Northern colonies, it was a separation of church and state. The Middle colonies economy came from growing crops and fur trading with the Native Americans.
They also had a larger class of indentured servants and were mainly slaved based. In addition, the south lacked industry and ship building. Cotton was their main source. “Their religious systems” The south lacked religious organization; however, the other colonies had a diverse religious system.
The English settlements in New England, The Middle, and The Southern colonies of North America varied immensely. From the time the colonists arrived to North America and began colonizing up until the end of some colonies each colony was different in their own ways. Northern, Middle, and Southern colonies each had their own demographic issues, economic challenges, and religious variations that made them stand apart from one another. In New England the colonies consisted of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire.
The colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were a start of the new world for England. These were founded by similar people but, with their strikingly differences, grew into separate political, economic and social structures. Both settlements arose from over-crowdedness in England: people wanted a better life. Virginia was settled by men who were single and looking for opportunities and wealth. They were part of the Anglican religion.
Each colonial region was distinct in its own way. That is largely because of the pattern of colonization that occurred from 1607 to the early 1700 's. But if you really break it down, societies in the colonies were separated either economically or religiously. New England societies were primarily founded on religious views which created covenant communities originally based off of the Mayflower Compact. The people of New England colonies (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire) saw no real difference between separation of church and state.
The New England colonies were first founded in the last 16th to 17th century as a sanctuary for differing religious groups. New England was made up of the Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire. New Hampshire, however, was formed for economic reasons instead of religious ones. The Chesapeake region, which is made up of the colonies of Maryland and Virginia, was founded by the British colonies for the purpose of farming. However, by the 1700’s, despite both being settled by Englishmen, New England and the Chesapeake region had developed differently.
