Similarities Between Nietzsche And Hayakawa

Both Hayakawa and Nietzsche speak in such ways that they believe humans are ignorant, and both have expressed tones suggesting they believe that each experience we have is fabrications by our senses and that language and concepts have no relationship to the "outside" world. However, Nietzsche explains it further than Hayakawa does. Hayakawa stated that we could never know anything as it actually is and that language can be limiting, he says that this should motivate us to be aware of when we are abstract, so we can reason in a way that really is logical.
While Nietzsche discusses how humans, likes to delude ourselves in what he describes as self-deception, and we created logic so that we can control the reality of the world. Both Hayakawa and Nietzsche agree that describing something in our own term is a form of abstraction. In his paper "On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense", he states "What does man know of himself? Can he even once perceive himself completely, laid out as if in an illuminated glass case? Does not nature keep much the most from him, even about his body, to

Despite their similarities, they are Different in what way?different For example; Hayakawa says that being aware of where language comes from leads to more accurate, fair thinking. Hayakawa invests language with the meaning of our use of it and the effects it has on humankind. If the words were depended on their context, then it would be better to assume that any speech act will involve all these functions. "Literature is the most exact expression of feelings, while science is the most exact kind of reporting"