Similarities Between Roman And Chinese Empires

The Roman and the Chinese empires, I would say, had different forms of governing during the classical period as they practiced the republic representative and the monarchy system respectively due to differences in their societal structure. On the contrary, they both had some similarities such as using dictatorship to fortify political control on their subjects. In Rome, the use of the republic style of governing helped to control power among few people, and also regulate political power which then stabilized the government, making the citizens participate in governance and also count on their representatives to deliver without exception.
Whereas, in the Chinese empire the use of monarchy was established to govern the citizens in a firm manner to control the people so they couldn’t rebel against the political authority. In other words, the use of dictatorship in the Chinese empire kept the citizens in line. Primarily, leaders from both empires exercised the use of religious ideologies to shape the mind set and actions of their subjects. Since, individuals behavior were solely attributed to their religious beliefs, both empires had a

In this way, a strong single authority was built to control the people which proficiently curbed rebellion. In Rome, various armies created by the General, payed their loyalty to the leader more often rather than the state. Whereas in China, the ruler had complete control of all the armies and often times, there is a struggle for power between monarch families to appoint a leader who would do more good for the people. In addition, military forces in both empires were utilized to control the citizens due to the expansion and multiple territories of both empires. Even though, the rulers made all the major decisions, these empires were so big to govern by themselves, so the use of large armies were employed to help control political power within both