ipl-logo

Similarities Between The Dick Act And Gun Control By David Deming

673 Words3 Pages

David Deming wrote an article named "What Does the Second Amendment Mean?" because for years most people have interpreted the Second Amendment erroneously. Deming stated in his article, "When we insist on the right to own guns, we are only asking for a right that has been ours by twenty-five hundred years… To be deprived of our ancient and inalienable right is to be reduced to serfdom. It is an intolerable affront to a free people." Most citizens United Sates have agreed and supported the Second Amendment because the Second Amendment has allowed people to defend themselves; yet, The Second Amendment should have been eliminated when the National Guard replaced the militias in 1903.

(Ethical) The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia …show more content…

David Kopel, the writer of "The Dick Act and Gun Control," explained that "The first federal statutes governing the militia of the United States were enacted in 1792… The old militia statutes were repealed and replaced by the Militia Act of 1903, 32 Stat 775, commonly known as the "Dick Act" for its sponsor Charles F.W. Dick, a Major General in the Ohio National Guard." The Second Amendment should have been eliminated since the system of militias fated, but since the Second Amendment was not eliminated. "Every year in the U.S., an average of more than 100,000 people are shot," according to The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun …show more content…

The two-year-old found the gun because the owner of the car left the gun in the car. The owner of the car left his gun in the car because he has the "right to keep and bear arms." Unfortunately, Christopher Ingraham said, "This type of thing happens from time to time: A little kid finds a gun, fires it, and hurts or kills himself or someone else." people have used the excuse of having a gun for the security of his family and himself, and the Second Amendment has allowed people to "keep and bear arms" for security reasons. Yet, if the Second Amendment would have been discarded in 1903, then people would not need guns to protect their family members, or themselves from other people who have

Open Document