When Simon was killed in Lord of the Flies by William Golding, his role, a righteous and pure boy untainted by barbarity, perished along with his body. He embodied the innocence and naivety of the modern civilization and symbolized the children before they mutated into savages, influenced by the lack of regulation and jurisdiction. In spite of this, one can argue that his passing was not a primary shifting mark in the novel due to the power dynamic between all the boys remaining the same, considering that Piggy continued to be neglected as Jack went on to attaining authority on the island. While it may seem like nothing changed, Simon’s murder allowed Jack to display his superiority and bring out the violent and uncontrollable nature within all the boys. As a result, since Jack’s philosophy of savageness and cruelty was fueled by Simon’s death, the event was a major turning point in the novel. Simon’s abrupt end contributed to the worst in all of the boys, even the littluns. In Chapter Nine of Lord of the Flies, after Simon’s brutal murder, “Somewhere over the darkened curve of the …show more content…
Jack’s beliefs of malice were proven, demonstrating that everyone had a dark side, whether they chose to acknowledge it or not. Jack also earned enough authority to acquire dominance of the island through Simon’s passing, due to the fact that his capabilities of violence were displayed, whereas before the boys might have been doubtful of his dubious boasting. Simon’s death also caused Piggy to obtain more self-confidence, using his emotion and attachment to Simon as a powerful anchor, in with he realized that the savage game the island and Jack were playing had gone to excessive lengths. Simon’s death made it so that Jack could dominate the island and further spread his ideas of disorder and brutality, dooming the boys to bloodshed and their own ultimate