ipl-logo

Responding To Singer On Individuality Summary

1959 Words8 Pages

Responding to Singer: On Individualism and Pragmatics
Michael Anderson Soh Sheng Rong
Matriculation number: U1731581B
22 September 2017
Words: 1917
This paper is written as a response to Singer’s “Famine, Affluence and Morality”. Singer poses what he deems a moral obligation to mankind. That is, we are not just responsible for our personal good and are instead obligated to intervene to rescue others from suffering if we possess the capability to do so. His argument enforces a criterion of forced action that demands the individual takes action, putting forth the claim that apathy when we have the ability to resolve others of misery is immoral. In the first segment of the paper, I attempt to offer a comprehensive explanation of Singer’s view, …show more content…

From Singer’s perspective, it is irrelevant if someone’s suffering is physically distant from us. However, there are reasons why we place higher value on relationships that are closer to us. The wellbeing of those who we have forged meaningful relationships with have a tendency to outweigh the wellbeing of strangers. This is not just a callous social construct. As human beings, there are a finite number of issues that our mind can conceptualise at any point in time. In fact, this number should be quite small. There is a reason why we are more likely to concern ourselves with the problems of those in proximity of us. Forming close relationships with those around us allow us to better care for them, reducing the amount of effort required to increase their wellbeing. It is much easier for us to aid a friend or a neighbour suffering from a lack of food or shelter than someone on the other side of the globe. The amount of resources it would expend for us to resolve that suffering will also be measurably lower. Therefore the formation of interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships is conducive to the incremental promotion of wellbeing found in utilitarianism. Abiding by Singer’s argument renders all existing relationships moot. That is, if I was faced with the dilemma of choosing between my mother’s life and that of a stranger, they would be considered equal. Even worst, if you threw in an additional sandwich for a child who skipped …show more content…

This sense of apathy arguably also has utility. It allows us to go about our daily lives without constant deliberation on how we should be compensating for suffering on the other side of the globe. How else can we, as the fallible beings that we are, function normally with this metaphorical rat constantly biting at our toes? Acknowledging our fallibility, Singer’s proposition that we have a moral obligation to prevent something bad from occurring, even in the event where we do not have to sacrifice anything of comparable moral worth, seems too much to ask. This is because it imposes on us the expectation that people have to proactively seek out and absolve others of their suffering should we have the resources to do so. The fact that Singer wants to impose suffrage-reducing acts as a moral obligation instead of simply promoting their occurrence makes it counter-intuitive to pragmatics. This leads me to my second

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty

1699 Words | 7 Pages

In Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he argues the importance of donation to poor people, which could mean the difference between life and death for children in need. He gives an example for Bob, who has an opportunity to save a child’s life, but he could lose his worthy car. He makes a comparison between people who are capable to donate money to save children lives and people who have no chance to help or donate under certain situation such as Bob. He also encourages people who are in the middle class to donate at a minimum of 200$; furthermore, he thinks that people should donate more like 200.000$ when they consider the level of sacrifice that they would demand of Bob’s situation. He gives some estimates for the amount of donations that people should give to overseas.

Read More

The Singer Solution To World Poverty Rhetorical Analysis

1078 Words | 5 Pages

Making the World a Better Place Poverty is the state of being extremely poor. Most people face poverty once they have children and start to live on their own. In “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift he presents a solution to mothers who are poor and cannot consume enough for the children. However, Peter Singer's view in “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is to create the best outcome for those who are poor. To solve the world's problems everyone needs to help each other, stop being selfish, children to not be disturb, and adults to have same job opportunities, however others oppose saying the best way to solve world poverty problems would be to feed the wealthy with the poor.

Read More

Singer Solution To World Poverty Argument

1292 Words | 6 Pages

While pointing out that it is much easier to ignore an appeal for money to help those you’ll never meet than to consign a child to death, Singer uses his utilitarian philosophy to deflect the argument, stating that “if the upshot of the American’s failure to donate the money is that one more kid dies… then it is, in some sense, just as bad as selling the kid to the organ peddlers.” This argument, however, can only be made while using false dilemmas. Singer also addresses a large criticism of his work, that one can’t decide moral issues by taking opinion polls. The argument to this reiterates how the audience would feel being in these situations. This argument is poor as it does not address how the entire article is based on how everyone feels about this particular subject.

Read More

Eugene Debs Brother's Keeper Analysis

636 Words | 3 Pages

Do we want to assist others or it is because of our grim emotions? Philip Kain, professor of Philosophy at Santa Clara University, who wrote “understanding guilt”, explains that people act upon others due to their guilt. Kain states. “98% of people are affected by guilt and act upon”, which means people only help since they are affected by guilt. Not only that, he also explains that “ Guilt is why people assist others, not moral obligation”.

Read More

Philippa Foot Arguments Against Utilitarianism

1325 Words | 6 Pages

Caleb Stephens April 15, 2017 Introduction to Philosophy The goal of this paper is to demonstrate that Philippa Foot’s objection, raised to her own argument against utilitarianism, is correct. Her initial thesis is that benevolence, while the foundation of utilitarianism, is an internal end of morality, rather than the ultimate end of morality. The possible objection to this that there must be some overarching reason behind morality, which must imply a form of consequentialism. The response she offers is that there should be some other form of morality, which is a weak argument, as it does not provide an alternate conception of morality itself.

Read More

The Singer Solution To World Poverty Analysis

1805 Words | 8 Pages

In this paper I will be arguing against Peter Singer’s views on poverty, which he expresses in his paper “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Singer argues that all people with wealth surplus to their essential needs are morally obligated to prevent the suffering of those in dire situations. I will argue that you can not hold people morally obligated to prevent the suffering of others, and that people can only be held morally obligated to prevent suffering that they themselves caused. To begin, we will look at Singers beliefs and arguments regarding poverty and the responsibility of people to help those in need. Singer’s first arguments revolves around a girl named Dora, who is a retired schoolteacher, who is barely making a living writing

Read More

Peter Singer's Argument In Famine, Affluence And Morality

3128 Words | 13 Pages

(Singer, 1972, p. 235) This could end up with humanity missing out on revolutionary improvements in human knowledge and impede the betterment of civilisation. However, this does not imply that people are morally permitted not to contribute to famine relief, and does not imply that people are only obligated to

Read More

Justice System In David Eagleman's The Brain On Trial

1677 Words | 7 Pages

He uses examples of cases in which people committed crimes involuntarily. Eagleman also cites examples of mental diseases in which the victims have no control over their impulses or actions. In other words, there are people who simply cannot stop themselves from making horrible or regrettable decisions. Therefore, this essay challenges the assumption that people have the power to choose how they live their lives and to make the right decisions at all times. Eagleman addresses the readers directly in order to be able to demonstrate that he understands that his readers will find his ideas radical.

Read More

Critical Evaluation Essay: The Perils Of Indifference

855 Words | 4 Pages

The Perils of Indifference Critical Evaluation Essay In the past, indifference has led to the murder of millions of people. Indifference is when we, the humans race, do not care about those who suffer from the injustice, violence, or oppression on behalf of others (Clare). On 12 April 1992, Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor gave a speech regarding human indifference in front of President William J. Clinton and the first lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton, at the White House. What was he trying to accomplish during his speech?

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

673 Words | 3 Pages

This quote essentially is a blueprint for the entirety of the argument, as it concludes that if an being can experience suffering, it is entitled to rights. The author explains that suffering is a vital element that gives a being the right to be considered equally. If a being is able to experience joy and suffering, it has the ability to develop and have interests. Singer gives an example of a rock vs mouse incident, to prove this claim, “A stone does not have interests because it cannot suffer. Nothing that we can do to it could possibly make any difference to its welfare...

Read More

Barbara Lazear Ascher's 'On Compassion'

820 Words | 4 Pages

Frederick Buechner once said, “Compassion is sometimes the fatal capacity for feeling what it is like to live inside somebody else's skin.” Similarly, an author by the name of Barbara Lazear Ascher wrote an essay called “On Compassion,” in which she states that people learn about compassion when they experience hardships and begin to put oneself in another’s place. Along with the idea of compassion being learned, Ascher also tries to make us wonder what our motive is that leads us to being compassionate. Ascher tries to make us question why we feel the need to be compassionate towards others throughout her essay.

Read More

Is Survival Selfish Lane Wallace Analysis

288 Words | 2 Pages

“Is Survival Selfish” is an argumentative text written by Lane Wallace. The text focuses on the question of whether survival is an act of selfishness or intelligence. Author Wallace also draws your attention to whether saving someone in dire situations is altruism or idiocy. Throughout the story, the author provides evidence in means to support her claim and reasons. Wallace believes that “self-preservation” isn’t always instinctual and there are many factors involved, including the fact that every survival testing situation is different.

Read More

Examples Of Poverty In Frankenstein

1326 Words | 6 Pages

Even though people suffer, when it is noticed, others help them as much as

Read More

Schopenhauer Religion Analysis

1644 Words | 7 Pages

Discussion question 8 discusses how Schopenhauer believes that compassion is the true and only basis of moral action and not religion. Why does he believe that? Do you agree with him on this point? Why or why not? Describe Schopenhauer’s notion of justice and provide a reason or two to why you would agree or disagree with such an account.

Read More

Peter Singer's Argument Against Animal Rights

2076 Words | 9 Pages

The way singer explains this principle is through a utilitarian prospective, suggesting two viewpoints, Jeremy Bentham says “interest of every being affected by an action are to be taken into account and given the same weight as the like interests of any other being. ”(3) The second utilitarian, Henry Sidgwick, says “ the good of any one individual is of no more importance, from the point of view (if I may say so) of the Universe, than the good of any other. ”(3) Singer explains in these principles an aspect of achieving happiness and avoid pain.

Read More

More about Responding To Singer On Individuality Summary

Related Topics

Open Document