ipl-logo

Singer's Objection Of Animals Rights To Non-Human-Animals

501 Words3 Pages

Singer argues that non-human-animals deserve moral consideration using three claims: equality is based on equal consideration; equality is a moral idea, not factual; and sentience is a prerequisite for equality.
Singer demonstrates how arguments against extending rights to non-human-animals are inconsistent and thus unsupportable. He argues that membership to the species Homo sapiens is the only valid criteria that successfully excludes all non-humans and includes all humans; he cites that the difference between mentally-disabled-humans and healthy-humans is a wider gap than of certain non-human-animals. With current criteria for providing equality not being based on intelligence, or other relevant characteristics, Singer emphasizes that arguments against non-human-animals’ rights are circular with the premise: human beings have rights, and non-human-animals do not because they are not human beings.
He relates this issue to the Black, and Women’s Rights movements with arguments in both realms running parallel. Just as exclusion of rights based on sex/race is immoral, so too is exclusion based on species; there is no relevant difference between humans and non-human-animals thus there is no rational for believing that the members of the former …show more content…

He argues for sentience by highlighting how other criteria are insufficient as they are not inclusive of all humans. Intelligence is one criterion he rejects since some members of the Homo sapiens are less intelligent than some other non-human-animals, yet these members (e.g. dementia patients), do not receive lesser moral consideration. If intelligence were a criterion for equality then we should have no issue with using disabled-humans as a food source, leather source and so forth in the same way we use

Show More
Related

Norcross's Argument Analysis

538 Words | 3 Pages

He continues to look at the “rights” of moral agents and that moral agents can only be if they themselves can make moral decisions. Animals cannot make moral

Read More

Analysis Of Stimulus 2, By Francie Patterson And Wendy Gordon

1220 Words | 5 Pages

Through our time we have only given the title of personhood to humans, but with the knowledge and science we have now we should have no choice but grant basic moral rights and personhood to highly developed or sentient animals. In “Stimulus 2,”

Read More

Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis

782 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

Read More

Peter Singer's Utilitarian Theory On The Ethical Treatment Of Non-Human Animals

860 Words | 4 Pages

In the film, "Louis Theroux's African Hunting Party", South African wild game farmers advocate trophy hunting as a necessary activity for saving certain species from inevitable extinction due to illegal wildlife poaching. However, when considering Peter Singer's utilitarian theory on the ethical treatment of non-human animals, the process of shooting and killing an animal to preserve its species seems counterintuitive. Applying Singer's perspective, my position is that trophy hunting is morally unacceptable as it reasserts speciesism by disregarding the suffering of the animals being murdered for sport. Indeed, the act of purchasing a hunting permit so that a person may kill an animal for its material value dismisses the animal's personhood.

Read More

Peter Singer's Argument On Cruel To Animals

113 Words | 1 Pages

I, like Mary Midgley, agree with Peter Singer in that humans should not harm or be cruel to animals if it is not completely necessary. I agree with his argument regarding animals being used for cosmetic testing and medical testing, and with his argument against harsh factory farming practices, but I find his moral argument against the use of animals for food questionable. I believe meat-eating as a dietary practice for all of humankind is justifiable. Peter Singer implies that humans and non-humans are equal in more ways than many people like to recognize, but one thing he fails to acknowledge is that humans and non-humans also share a shared instinct for survival.

Read More

Summary Of Empty Cages

1247 Words | 5 Pages

One argument that he addresses against animal rights is “Animals do not understand what rights are”(Regan 65) so they should not have rights. To this he responds, well children don’t know what kidneys are, therefore the child doesn’t have

Read More

Peter Carruther's Argument Against Animals, By Peter Caruthers

423 Words | 2 Pages

(Carruthers, 1999, p. 114). “Someone who argues that since animals do not have rights,

Read More

Singer's Argument For Equality In Society

703 Words | 3 Pages

Cohen continues to add that we have a moral obligation to not inflict any unnecessary suffering on animals. To further build his argument, he also takes on a possible objection that claims that because some human might be unable to be autonomous or be morally able, they don’t. He rebuts this objection by saying his statements apply to members of species as whole, therefore, all humans would have

Read More

Machan's Arguments Against Animal Rights

1408 Words | 6 Pages

It is argued then that because of this, do infants and the mentally-challenged not have rights either? While this is a plausible objection, it fails, because Machan’s argument doesn’t attribute rights to just moral agents, his argument attributes rights specifically to all humans. Machan constructs his argument on the basis that rights are attributed to species or kinds, not by individuals. He makes it clear that this is the correct way to attribute rights by his examination of nature’s hierarchy. He describes that kinds of things are what are judged on a similar basis.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

673 Words | 3 Pages

In the article All Animals Are Equal, written by Peter Singer addresses the inadequacies surrounding the rights of animals in the societies of today. Singer opens the article by presenting a scholarly parallels between the fight for gender equality, banishment of racism and the establishment of rights for “nonhumans.” In order to explain this constant set of inequalities that seem to riddle our society, Singer readily uses the term “speciesism”, which he acquired from a fellow animals rights advocator, Richard Ryder. Essentially, this term is defined by Singer as a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species. Singer claims that if this idea of speciesism

Read More

Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

1170 Words | 5 Pages

In human history, a number of oppressed groups have campaigned for equality, demanding for an expansion on the moral view of life, and to be treated fairly in the eye of consideration. This means that when the matter concerns this group, their voices are heard, and treated with value, and consideration. Where this equality is not determined by an assembly of facts like that group’s collective intelligence level, the colour of their skin, or the physical strength of their bodies. This is what Peter Singer brings up in his essay: “All Animals are Equal”, that non-human animals should have equal consideration with humans when matters concern them. Going into a specific set of non-human animals known as primates, I argue that primates should have some of the fundamental rights and equal consideration that are given to humans.

Read More

Tom Regan's Argument For Animal Rights

655 Words | 3 Pages

There is no rational premise for denying that animals have inherent value, therefore humans have no reasoning for denying animals of rights. Animals have the capacity to form relationships with their species, feel pain and pleasure, make decisions, and understand their life’s importance to them, therefor by inherent value, animals should have rights. An objection to this argument could target the claim that all animals have inherent value. Regan states that subjects-of-a-life have inherent value, and that the difference between subjects-of-a-life and other living organisms is that subjects-of-a-life are aware and value their lives.

Read More

Peter Singer's Argument Against Animal Rights

2076 Words | 9 Pages

Animals Rights In society, animals are being killed for food, fur, and experiments. This raises the question is it ethical to kill other animals for our own person gain? As human, we live in a society where it is humane to kill other animals when it comes to survival, clothing and to help cure diseases. But this is not really answering the question why is this okay?

Read More

Preference Utilitarianism Theory Analysis

1225 Words | 5 Pages

Singer's theory of preference utilitarianism rests on the idea that everyone's preferences should be looked at equally. This means that all living and sentient beings have interests, can feel pain and pleasure. Preferences, in this case, does not mean happiness necessarily. Looking at happiness specifically, is another type of utilitarianism that will be discussed further in the later part of this essay. Singer includes people with severe disabilities, animals, intelligent aliens, and infants to the list of beings that need to be considered.

Read More

Animal Rights Argumentative Essay

1084 Words | 5 Pages

In 1789 Jeremy Bentham, one of the very first animal rights activists, argued that animals should be treated with equality due to the fact that they are sentient. Meaning that not only are they aware of perception, but receptive to

Read More

More about Singer's Objection Of Animals Rights To Non-Human-Animals

Related Topics

Open Document