ipl-logo

Skepticism In Hume's View Of Stoicism

771 Words4 Pages

Visualize someone hitting your hand with a hammer until it breaks. Instead of stopping them you simply say “you’re going to break my hand if you don’t stop.” After more hitting, they break your hand and your response is “see I warned you, you would break it.” That’s how I think of Epictetus’ stoicism, an unrealistic view of human’s internal situations. In contrast, Hume’s view of scepticism applies more to the reality and truthfulness of human internal and external insights and beliefs.

In stoicism, Epictetus focuses on “internals,” things he thought human could control with will power. Hume’s skepticism addresses the fact that “externals” do have an affect on humans and set up a logical system of dealing with situations beyond our own control, …show more content…

This is an assumption of an external and objective fact that is represented by my internal and subjective representation. It is very difficult to attribute any truth to my perception. If the capability between the mental image and the external object suggests the truth, since the only proof I have of an external world consists of internal pictures then a true word of objects is impossible to establish. However, Hume recognizes that this sort of skepticism violates a certain level of common sense. Hume suggests complete skepticism is not useful since "nature is always too strong for principle" (Hume #), making this philosophical view unrealistic to human nature. Hume, therefore, came up with the idea "mitigated skepticism." This method tries to limit philosophical inquiries to the abilities of human intelligence while also exercising caution in reasoning. Even so, the application of “mitigated skepticism” in everyday life is a hard task. Calculating each of our decisions with a system of logical steps is very time consuming. Life is short and people don’t have enough time and motivation to find the most logical result. Skepticism, specifically “mitigated skepticism,” is a philosophy that is not easy to live up to yet it is doable and can be moderated to everyday

Show More
Related
793 Words | 4 Pages

Though not entirely rational, confirmation bias is how beliefs are made

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

If a horse should be prideful and say, "I am handsome," it would be supportable. But when [he is] prideful, and say, "I have a handsome horse," know that [he is] proud of what is, in fact, only the good of the horse.” (#6). The Stoic knows that being humble is an important part of being a good member of society. It is a blend of these two aspects of being a Stoic, being humble in decision making and keeping peace, this is what makes the Stoics who follow “Then Handbook”, by Epictetus, truly good members of a

Read More
2271 Words | 10 Pages

The Ancient-modern debate involves two main tenets and philosophers Boethius and Niccolo Machiavelli and both have extremely different and even contradictory views of politics and whether morality comes into play and how. Boethius covers the classical side of the debate where he gets some of his ideas from other philosophers in the classical rea like Plato and Socrates. Niccolo Machiavelli covers the modern aspect of the debate. Both speak on similar themes like the conception of happiness, the role of “Lady Fortuna” or Fortune and politics. The ancient or classical view of in the Ancient modern debate of human nature is that humans are naturally good and naturally political.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

Philosophy 224 Monday/Wednesday 10-11:15 WORD COUNT In a small village, deep in the South American jungle of Guyana, two men overlook a massacre of over 900 people. Of these 900 people, about 300 were children. The men stand in silence, but only for a moment, they are philosophers… HUME: “This is truly astonishing… There is no way that Jim Jones could have been a prophet…”

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

Three of the most prominent challenges are related to the problem of manipulation and coercion, the role of chance, and the difficulty of defining free will. The problem of manipulation and coercion poses a significant challenge to Hume's view of free will. If individuals are manipulated or coerced into performing an action, their internal psychological states may not reflect their true desires, motivations, or beliefs. In such cases, it seems unfair to hold the individual morally responsible for their actions. This challenge highlights the role that external factors can play in deciding human action, even in the absence of external constraints.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Skepticism is the force that drives philosopher to continue challenging the unquestioned mass opinions. Skeptics are people who deny that we have knowledge about a specific subject. For example, a skeptic of the external world believes that we do not have any knowledge of the external world due to our perception of the world. Skepticism of the outside world argues that due to our perception, we are unable to have knowledge of the outside world. For instance, our eyes have deceived us do to illusions, like when hot asphalt looks like it has water on it.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

Epictetus did not have any rivals. He was well liked and was influenced by many philosophers. Stoicism’s closest rival was Epicureanism. Epicureanism was founded by Epicurus and taught people how to not fear death and the supernatural, as well as finding happiness at any given time. Its main belief is that pleasure is the end of life.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Which is live your life and accept, now I may not agree with what’s happening like if I break my leg its broke already how did that even it happen Epictetus mind I would have to accept it and move on. How it happens and why it happens it’s out of my control I accept it calmly and dispassionately. Even a Great man that was influence by his studies served in the same branch as me(Admiral James Bond Stockdale). Epictetus save his life in a way the Stoic philosopher save his life when he was shot down in Vietnam war and became a prisoner of war.

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Misunderstandings and faulty ideas are direct results of human reasoning digesting and misinterpreting ideas. Knowledge, in short, fuels reasoning. External concepts are taken in, where human reasoning then extrapolates and comprehends the knowledge. But what we take in from our senses can be misleading. Petrarch expresses in a faithful, crystalline, and unclouded Christian manner that he may not be able to trust ideas from the outside, but “it is He in whom I can trust” (101).

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

In the movie 12 Angry Men it showed many examples of Hume’s ideas such as skepticism, pluralism, relativism, and reasonable doubt. First let me explain what skepticism is, skepticism doubts the validation of knowledge or particular subject. Pluralism is the position that there are many different kinds of belief—but not all just as good as any other. Relativism is when the position that each belief is just as good as any other, since all beliefs are viewpoint dependent. Reasonable doubt is lack of proof that prevents a judge or jury to convict a defendant for the charged crime.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

In a very broad sense, Hume built his theories under the idea that “experience” is the only way one can realize the extent of their knowledge. Today, he is regarded as a preeminent figure of the Enlightenment,

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Epictetus’s way of philosophy is one that is purely Stoic, imploring that the solution to human finitude is one where humans can live life without showing feeling or complaining about pain and hardships towards unsavory situations. Each of his rules in his handbook offers advice in which the subject simply “deals” with disappointment, or rather, doesn’t expect something out of the scopes of reason and logic, so that, figuratively, when occurrences don’t go their way, they aren’t disappointed. This is because to Epictetus, all external events in life are pre-determined by fate, so it’s already out of our hands from the beginning. With a calm dispassion, or indifference, we approach our fate and accept it. This is shown in his rules in The Handbook,

Read More
1571 Words | 7 Pages

One notable Stoic was Marcus Aurelius who was a Roman emperor. The stoics believed that in order for us to be better, people who are just and wise, we must train our impulses which influences how we behave. We must always be in harmony with our nature. Another Hellenistic philosophy that existed during that period was skepticism. The skeptics uphold that humans must refrain from believing all dogmas.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Hume on the other hand can only confirm what has already happened, being that is the most truthful and logical

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

In the Story of the great Julius Caesar by Shakespeare there are two philosophies which include Stoicism and Epicureanism. Two characters that clearly stand by their beliefs are Brutus and Cassius. However before being explained, what is Stoicism and Epicureanism anyways? First off, what is Stoicism? Stoicism is a school that was founded in medieval times, it is a way of life for Brutus.

Read More

More about Skepticism In Hume's View Of Stoicism

Related Topics

Open Document