ipl-logo

Smoking Should Be Banned In The United States

610 Words3 Pages

Smoking and Tobacco Bans For many years, Americans have argued whether or not the government should put smoking bans in place. A smoking ban is a law enforced by government officials, stating that smoking is illegal, either in public or completely. Numerous cities and states passed laws restricting or banning smoking in public areas and in workplaces, and many private firms barred smoking in the workplace (Infobase Learning). Many citizens argue whether or not the government should have that much control; it cannot be argued that using tobacco products is extremely harmful to not only the ones using it, but to the ones around it as well. Passive smoke even causes severe damage to our environment and ecosystem. The use of tobacco products is extremely harmful to everyone; therefore, tobacco products should be banned completely. The government has the power to do many things, but many Americans suggest that the government shouldn’t be able to police what citizens do. Although that is correct to an extent, what many people don’t understand is that when using tobacco, the damage carries to other citizens within the area. The government officials have been chosen to protect …show more content…

Using tobacco products in public, even in designated smoking areas, causes damage to those around the consumer. The smoke from the tobacco products travels through the air, making it capable of doing damage to all those around them. Smoke is able to travel a great distance, reaching far beyond the designated smoking areas. If the government had the authority to ban the use of tobacco in all public places, less children from nonsmoking homes would be suffering from secondhand smoke, also known as passive smoke. The government should be able to police what is allowed in public areas; smoking in public causes damage to Americans that otherwise would not have been

Show More
Related
255 Words | 2 Pages

In his article, “Addicted to Health” Robert H. Bork has written about an ideal that is told through an informative argument on how government efforts are betraying what the founding fathers have built this great nation upon. The idea of freedom. Bork claims that many recent altercations with tobacco companies betray an ultimate ambition to control American lives. He implies many facts that include percentages about the smokers of American society and explains how the government relies on tobacco companies, to help cover up the funds that have been lost throughout the years. He also relates the issue to alcoholic beverages and the era of prohibition.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

Argumentative Writting Prompt Should government units be able to regulate what we consume? No, we should not be controlled for something as little as that. There are many opinions about this topic. And many of them are relevant and logica,l but some are not. First of all, the First Lady Michelle Obama announced it last year, taxes come from candy and soft-drink makers.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

Stress from events such as the Oklahoma City Bombing causes people to smoke. Studies show that tragedies such as the 9-11 attacks or the Oklahoma City Bombing causes people to smoke, which can lead to other negative effects. Most people remember where they were when the Oklahoma City Bombing happened. In the Oklahoma City Bombing “A total of 168 persons died and 675 persons sustained injuries”(Sample). If someone saw on the news that a building blew up and American lives were taken one could assume that would cause a lot of stress.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking cigarettes doesn’t only have an effect on the one who smokes however additionally the people around them. I feel that smoking should not be legalized in the United States, even if this is an unacceptable issue to the majority of people in the country. There are smoking bans that were enforced in early years to insure the protection of the people in businesses, and eating place

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Many Canadians still think that the government can do better and have campaigned relentlessly to make cigarettes illegal. Users of cigarettes have responded to these campaigns saying that cigarettes should still remain being legal as users have the right and freedom to do as they please. This reason is valid, but definitely not

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Although numerous amounts of people believe they should be able to make their own decisions, the government should be able to control what Americans are consuming because of children, health, and the future.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

At this juncture, the issue at hand becomes an expense as it starts to involve lawyers, hearings and the likes. Also, I would like to believe that since it is stated that faculty’s campus organizations are prohibited from accepting any money or gifts from tobacco companies, the faculty as a whole does not earn any financial boosters from tobacco companies. Thus, the damage caused is catered for by the faculty. Likewise, such an experience is what Machiavelli describes as rewarding a few but offending many. Mostly, by this statement, he shows that there are some activities which are satisfactory for a small portion of the population (in this case allowing the “smoking zone”) but hurt the larger part.

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

There is grey disgusting cancerous smoke through the air you and your loved ones breathe. I believe that smoking cigarettes in public places should be illegal for many reasons such as the health and safety dangers of others and even myself. Firstly those who believe that smoking should be banned say that cigarettes can affect smokers deeply in the long run. “Over 50,000 studies of the health effects of tobacco in dozens of countries have detailed its dangers.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

The Supreme court banned smoking is some areas. I think smoking should be banned from all public places because of the disease that it can cause and all the harm it can do to people. People should have the right to walk wherever they want without being around the affects of someone smoking outside or worrying about having their life put in danger. If everyone make a campaign against smoking it can soon possibly get banned from all public places. I would start a campaign and try to get the attention from the government to have smoking banned so no one gets harmed or have to walk outside smelling the smell of

Read More
1778 Words | 8 Pages

If you have the right to live, you cannot go everywhere smoking in the public and causing people heart attacks, and expect to be protect

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

In fact, those who smoke have their life span shortened by about approximately. However, the government must ban tobacco smoking in order to prevent smokers from lethal diseases, protect nonsmokers as well as saving the environment. The most obvious reason as to why tobacco should be

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

As smokefree.gov stated, the smoke “contains over 7,000 harmful chemicals, at least 250 of which are known to damage… [ones] health.” Also, the secondhand smoke “can… stay in the air for several hours after somebody smokes.” Therefore, it is harmful to secondhand smoke. B. Reason to listen: So, let’s look at why smoking should be banned in public places.

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking has become a social habit nowadays. When people around are smoking, the person practically feel like he/she should be doing the same. And this is increasing day by day in our country. Smoking tribulates almost every organ of the body. It is the leading cause of more than 443,00 deaths each year.

Read More

More about Smoking Should Be Banned In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document