“Is social stability worth the price?” The novel Brave New World infers that keeping in mind the ultimate goal to obtain stability, every individual undergoes the process of becoming a drone. "Designing" these mechanical people is to stabilize society as a whole, however at what cost?
Opportunity is the key to being human. In this Utopian culture, every subject is allowed to settle on their own decisions to a specific degree. Despite the fact of being forcefully operated, each believe they are not physically compelled to pick their way of life. The government aim of the society is for dependence on others to be nonexistent. "No human advancement without social strength. No social security without individual dependability" (Huxley 42).
…show more content…
These infants are tortured to learn right from wrong, to know what they are designed to achieve in life. The Controller (or rulers/government) made the greatest dehumanizing condition by following this procedure. Everyone liquefies into one bland blob, for “strength” and advancement.
To "perfect" the concept of stabilization, sexual relations with various partners is encouraged, and essentially seen as odd if not followed. Really taking shape of people, the Controller sets the infants in a room, naked. In this procedure, the conclusion is failing to be sensitive to the human body, and the feelings that accompany it. In this Utopia, the statement of "no strings attached" is adored. In today's general public, it is fairly loved, however seen as harming. Ironic, considering the responses are inverse.
The society made in this novel keep on believing their joy is driven by their own sentiments and beliefs. Be that as it may, Huxley made a Utopian culture where the overall society's bliss is misleadingly approved and in a manner of speaking, upheld. To answer if social stability is justified regardless of the value, my response would be a firm no. On the off chance that genuine happiness, love, pain, and so on, is the price of stabilization, I would be content