ipl-logo

Southworth Vs Oliver Case Summary

465 Words2 Pages

Southworth vs Oliver. The level of court that has decided this case is the Supreme Court. Decision made by the prior court Superior Court was to affirm the case. This case took place in the year 1978. Oliver wanted to sell some of his property and some of his Forest Service grazing permits to another person named Southworth. He then asked him if he wanted to purchase it. Later on, Southworth agreed to purchase it. In addition to, Oliver assumed that he was interested in only the property. Holliday who was another neighbor at the time was interested in the Forest Service grazing permits. In contrast, Oliver ended the conversation with the price of the land. Southworth state that he would be able to get all the financial information settled. …show more content…

When Southworth received the letter he probably assumed that it was an offer because it contained information like the value and price not a sure way of a valid offer. A contract law is an agreement that is enforced by law. What makes ups a contract is mutual assent, consideration, capacity and legality. Mutual assent just simply means that an offer was shown and followed by accepting or declining that offer including explicit terms but not limited. Consideration can include property or some act. For capacity, it is someone’s capability of satisfying elements in order to begin binding contracts. Legality refers to just a purpose and is required in every enforceable contract. The purpose of this contract was for Oliver to sell his land. This is because the offer can be sent to other people such as a third party. The letter does not need to have the term “offer”; it just has to be clear and straight forward to be considered a valid offer. Since it was a letter that had financial information such as the value of the property and other related things it looked like if it was an offer.. It was not really enforceable because it was not considered an offer although it did include the name of the property and the value. The way that the letter was worded was that it was clear and explicit, that is why he thought it was an offer. But, it was not. It didn’t state that it was a valid offer for the purchase of the

Show More
Related
941 Words | 4 Pages

The court indicates that determining whether something is a gift or not depends on the intention of the transferor (Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34) and the lack of any legal or moral obligation to make such a payment does not establish that as a gift, especially if the payment proceeds from “the incentive of anticipated benefit” of an economic nature. It is irrelevant if the donor wants the item. The court stated that the motives behind the gift are significant in this case, and the court believes that the car was gifted as a compensation for the past information Berman received and as an investment for the future

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

Commentaries 1. Area 432.010 peruses in part:No activity might be conveyed to charge ․ any individual ․ upon any agreement made for the offer of grounds, apartments, hereditaments, or an enthusiasm for or concerning them ․ unless the understanding whereupon the activity should be brought, or some reminder or note thereof, might be in composing and marked by the gathering to be charged therewith ․All references to statutes are to RSMo 2000, unless generally showed. 2. Appealing party refers to Norden v. Friedman, 756 S.W.2d 158 (Mo. banc 1988) for the recommendation that the privilege to mine minerals from genuine property is an agreement managing the offer of an enthusiasm for land to which the statute of frauds applies. Norden held the record was misty, yet in the event that the agreement was not to be performed

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

MILLERSBURG — Identified through DNA evidence collected from urine left at the scene of a crime, Delaware County man on Wednesday denied criminal involvement in an armed robbery of a Monroe Township couple in their home. Kevin A. Strickland, 24, who currently is incarcerated at the Toledo Correctional Institution, pleaded not guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to aggravated robbery and theft. If convicted of the charges, which include a specification alleging the use of a firearm, Strickland faces up to 12 years in prison.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

I. Facts: On September 17, 1998, John Lawrence had two guests over at his home in Houston, Texas. Lawrence and his two guests, Eubanks and Garner were all drinking heavily, so they decided to spend the night. Eubanks and Garner had an on-again off-again relationship for eight years. Lawrence and Eubanks were good friends for over 20 years.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

Somerset V. Stewart Case was a legal case that took place in England in 1772. The debate was whether James Somerset, a previously enslaved African man who escaped to England, should be freed or not. This court case took place during the colonial period of America and although it was an English court case, its significance traveled further than England’s border and even to the colonies. This case played an indirect but major role in what would become American history. Somerset V. Stewart's legal case foreshadowed conflict about slavery that would eventually meet its peak in the American Civil War.

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 was enacted by congress it liberated organized labor from the federal courts injunctions. Prior to the act a federal judge could be convinced that a strike, picketing, or boycott would violate the law they would issue an injunction so that the union would have to stop the strike (Bernstein, N.N.. 2015). Norris-LaGuardia Act is called a "yellow dog" contract, an employee promises not to join the union to stay in contract with their employer. It made it so federal judges could not issue injunctions if the strike was not violent. The act defined "labor dispute" so that there was no possible misunderstanding of the terms of employment (Bernstein, N.N.. 2015).

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

This rule is related to parol evidence, as well as extrinsic evidence in relation to the contract. If even a single term to the contract is finalized between the parties and is finally prescribed in a written form, the other evidence (i.e. parol or extrinsic) will be barred. For instance, Aakash agrees to sell a car to Rohan,

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Then he wrote something on a paper and read it over, and says: “There- you see it says ‘for a consideration.’ That means I have bought it of you and paid you for it. Now, you sign

Read More
1196 Words | 5 Pages

This is because contracts do not fall within in Section 1 of the Law of Property Act, a deed would be needed to take effect in law. Subsequently contracts are not required to be registered on the register and do not override but, can be protected by being registered as notice. The facts suggest that Abduls contracts is valid. If it does comply with section 2 then Abdul can claim for a breach of contract or it will be void. However, validity of the contract is not an essential point here because Abdul’s interest only exists in equity as contract are not capable of being legal and it was not granted by deed.

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

This description serves various purposes and it being specific and accurate therefore is necessary. The seller or the signing principal must sign on the space provided for the same to execute the Bill of Sale

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

1. Jasmine agrees to purchase 1500 tons of recycled glass from Louie, the price to be determined at the time of delivery. Is such an agreement enforceable? Compare the common law with Article 2 of the UCC.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Why? Under Implied Warranties, Chapter 9 of the textbook (Don Mayer), these are those that circumstances alone compel reading into the sale. It is created by law, acting from an impulse of common sense. Also, the seller must pass the test of merchantability, which according to the textbook are: “What is merchantability?

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay it is explained about the concept of unconscionable conduct which that may be considered violable and enforceable within contract law. Valid contract is an agreement among the both parties, whereas unconscionable conduct is where one of the party taking unfair advantages and entering on a contract acknowledging the other parties disadvantage and disability. The contract can be voidable due to unconscionable conduct by the defendant when the plaintiff proves; they had lack of ability or disadvantage to protect themselves entering the contract and the defendant had known of the advantages of it. Furthermore, as the importance of consumer protection has grown to provide fairness in contractual matters, common law and contract law

Read More
1215 Words | 5 Pages

Further legal development is after all inevitable as parties keep relying on mutual trust and frequent co-operation in contracts. The reluctance in adopting the principle denies predictable and certain contractual relationship, parties who seek to contract in a reasonable commercial standard will have to go through lots of difficulties and ambiguities with the contract context under current

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Individuals consented to go into an agreement in verbal contract without making any paper report as proof hence they are hard to demonstrate and can make debate subsequent to there is no acceptable

Read More

More about Southworth Vs Oliver Case Summary

Open Document